Risk assessment method in relation to coal mine gas explosion based on safety information loss

IF 1 4区 工程技术 Q4 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL Process Safety Progress Pub Date : 2024-03-26 DOI:10.1002/prs.12601
Huimin Guo, Lianhua Cheng, Shugang Li, Bolin Jiang
{"title":"Risk assessment method in relation to coal mine gas explosion based on safety information loss","authors":"Huimin Guo, Lianhua Cheng, Shugang Li, Bolin Jiang","doi":"10.1002/prs.12601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Considering the uncertainty and fuzziness of the risk assessment index of coal mine gas explosion, a risk assessment model of gas explosion based on combinatorial weighting‐unascertained measure of safety information loss is proposed. First, 20 risk indicators are extracted from the six aspects of supply loss, transformation loss, transmission loss, perceived loss, cognition loss, and response loss in the process of safety information flow. The weight vector is constructed by the G1 method and anti‐entropy weight combination weighting method. Then, the single‐index measurement function is used to process the risk index measure. Based on the classification standard of the gas explosion risk assessment index, the single‐index and multi‐index measurement matrices are constructed. And the grade is judged according to the principle of maximum membership. Finally, a mine is selected for case application. The results show that the evaluation results are consistent with the actual situation and the method has certain feasibility. It provides a new idea and method for advanced control and accident prevention of coal mine gas explosion risk.","PeriodicalId":20680,"journal":{"name":"Process Safety Progress","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Process Safety Progress","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/prs.12601","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Considering the uncertainty and fuzziness of the risk assessment index of coal mine gas explosion, a risk assessment model of gas explosion based on combinatorial weighting‐unascertained measure of safety information loss is proposed. First, 20 risk indicators are extracted from the six aspects of supply loss, transformation loss, transmission loss, perceived loss, cognition loss, and response loss in the process of safety information flow. The weight vector is constructed by the G1 method and anti‐entropy weight combination weighting method. Then, the single‐index measurement function is used to process the risk index measure. Based on the classification standard of the gas explosion risk assessment index, the single‐index and multi‐index measurement matrices are constructed. And the grade is judged according to the principle of maximum membership. Finally, a mine is selected for case application. The results show that the evaluation results are consistent with the actual situation and the method has certain feasibility. It provides a new idea and method for advanced control and accident prevention of coal mine gas explosion risk.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于安全信息损失的煤矿瓦斯爆炸风险评估方法
考虑到煤矿瓦斯爆炸风险评估指标的不确定性和模糊性,提出了基于组合加权-不确定度量安全信息损失的瓦斯爆炸风险评估模型。首先,从安全信息流动过程中的供给损失、转换损失、传递损失、感知损失、认知损失、响应损失六个方面提取 20 个风险指标,然后根据这些风险指标的权重向量构建安全信息损失组合权重向量。采用 G1 法和反熵权组合加权法构建权向量。然后,使用单指数测量函数对风险指数测量值进行处理。根据瓦斯爆炸风险评估指标分级标准,构建单指标和多指标测量矩阵。并根据最大成员原则判断等级。最后,选择一个矿井进行案例应用。结果表明,评价结果符合实际情况,方法具有一定的可行性。为煤矿瓦斯爆炸风险的超前控制和事故预防提供了新的思路和方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Process Safety Progress
Process Safety Progress 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
10.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Process Safety Progress covers process safety for engineering professionals. It addresses such topics as incident investigations/case histories, hazardous chemicals management, hazardous leaks prevention, risk assessment, process hazards evaluation, industrial hygiene, fire and explosion analysis, preventive maintenance, vapor cloud dispersion, and regulatory compliance, training, education, and other areas in process safety and loss prevention, including emerging concerns like plant and/or process security. Papers from the annual Loss Prevention Symposium and other AIChE safety conferences are automatically considered for publication, but unsolicited papers, particularly those addressing process safety issues in emerging technologies and industries are encouraged and evaluated equally.
期刊最新文献
Numerical study of failure modes of hazardous material tanks exposed to fire accidents in the process industry So, you cannot vent: A deep dive into other explosion protection methods Risk and consequence analysis of ammonia storage units in a nuclear fuel cycle facility Diagnosing electrostatic problems and hazards in industrial processes: Case studies Numerical simulation study on propane gas leakage and diffusion law in slope terrain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1