Multi-Institutional Analysis of Insurance Denial Patterns Within Rhinology.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-28 DOI:10.1177/19458924241242856
Tyler A Janz, Najm S Khan, Aatin K Dhanda, Masayoshi Takashima, Arthur W Wu, Dennis M Tang, Thomas S Higgins, Murugappan Ramanathan, Omar G Ahmed
{"title":"Multi-Institutional Analysis of Insurance Denial Patterns Within Rhinology.","authors":"Tyler A Janz, Najm S Khan, Aatin K Dhanda, Masayoshi Takashima, Arthur W Wu, Dennis M Tang, Thomas S Higgins, Murugappan Ramanathan, Omar G Ahmed","doi":"10.1177/19458924241242856","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Obtaining insurance approval is a necessary component of healthcare in the United States and denials of these claims have been estimated to result in a loss of 3% to 5% of revenue.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Examine the trends in insurance denials for rhinological procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of deidentified financial data of patients who were treated by participating physicians across 3 institutions from January 1, 2021, to June 30, 2023. The data was queried for rhinological and non-rhinological procedures via CPT codes. Cumulative insurance denials were calculated and stratified by procedure and insurance type. Write-offs were dollar amounts associated with final denials.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A sample of 102,984 procedures and visits revealed a final denial rate between 2.2% and 2.9% across institutions (<i>p</i> = .72). The top three rhinological procedures for final write-offs were: nasal endoscopy (16.24%, $111,836.87), nasal debridement or polypectomy (6.48%, $79,457.51), and destruction of intranasal lesion (2.11%, $56,932.20). The write-off percentage for each procedure was highest among commercial insurance payers as opposed to Medicare or Medicaid.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Final denial rates of rhinology procedures ranged between 2% and 3%. Common procedures such as nasal endoscopy and nasal debridement are among the highest written-off procedures. Insurance denials can lead to notable revenue loss. Rhinology practices must continue to remain knowledgeable of the changes and effects of insurance reimbursement on their practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":7650,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19458924241242856","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Obtaining insurance approval is a necessary component of healthcare in the United States and denials of these claims have been estimated to result in a loss of 3% to 5% of revenue.

Objective: Examine the trends in insurance denials for rhinological procedures.

Methods: A retrospective review of deidentified financial data of patients who were treated by participating physicians across 3 institutions from January 1, 2021, to June 30, 2023. The data was queried for rhinological and non-rhinological procedures via CPT codes. Cumulative insurance denials were calculated and stratified by procedure and insurance type. Write-offs were dollar amounts associated with final denials.

Results: A sample of 102,984 procedures and visits revealed a final denial rate between 2.2% and 2.9% across institutions (p = .72). The top three rhinological procedures for final write-offs were: nasal endoscopy (16.24%, $111,836.87), nasal debridement or polypectomy (6.48%, $79,457.51), and destruction of intranasal lesion (2.11%, $56,932.20). The write-off percentage for each procedure was highest among commercial insurance payers as opposed to Medicare or Medicaid.

Conclusion: Final denial rates of rhinology procedures ranged between 2% and 3%. Common procedures such as nasal endoscopy and nasal debridement are among the highest written-off procedures. Insurance denials can lead to notable revenue loss. Rhinology practices must continue to remain knowledgeable of the changes and effects of insurance reimbursement on their practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
鼻科拒绝保险模式的多机构分析。
背景:在美国,获得保险批准是医疗保健的必要组成部分,据估计,拒绝保险理赔会导致 3% 至 5% 的收入损失:研究鼻科手术保险拒赔的趋势:方法:对 3 家机构的参与医生在 2021 年 1 月 1 日至 2023 年 6 月 30 日期间治疗的患者的去身份财务数据进行回顾性审查。通过 CPT 编码查询鼻科和非鼻科手术数据。计算了累计保险拒付率,并按手术和保险类型进行了分层。注销是指与最终拒付相关的金额:在 102,984 例手术和就诊样本中,各机构的最终拒付率介于 2.2% 和 2.9% 之间(p = .72)。最终核销率最高的三种鼻科手术分别是:鼻内窥镜检查(16.24%,111836.87 美元)、鼻腔清创术或息肉切除术(6.48%,79457.51 美元)和鼻内病变破坏(2.11%,56932.20 美元)。与医疗保险或医疗补助相比,商业保险支付者对每项手术的核销比例最高:结论:鼻科手术的最终拒付率介于 2% 与 3% 之间。鼻内窥镜检查和鼻腔清创术等常见手术是注销率最高的手术之一。保险拒付会导致显著的收入损失。鼻科诊所必须继续了解保险报销的变化和对诊所的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
11.50%
发文量
82
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy is a peer-reviewed, scientific publication committed to expanding knowledge and publishing the best clinical and basic research within the fields of Rhinology & Allergy. Its focus is to publish information which contributes to improved quality of care for patients with nasal and sinus disorders. Its primary readership consists of otolaryngologists, allergists, and plastic surgeons. Published material includes peer-reviewed original research, clinical trials, and review articles.
期刊最新文献
Doing the Rhinologic Work, From Humans to Mice to Robots. Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Promotes Telomerase Reverse Transcriptase Expression Contributes to Development of Allergic Rhinitis. Malvidin From Malva sylvestris L. Ameliorates Allergic Responses in Ovalbumin-Induced Allergic Rhinitis Mouse Model via the STAT6/GATA3 Pathway. Comparative Effectiveness of Dupilumab Versus Sinus Surgery for Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Polyps: Systematic Review and a Meta-Analysis. The Evaluation Value of the Modified Lund-Kennedy Nasal Endoscopy Score on the Efficacy of Sublingual Immunotherapy for Allergic Rhinitis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1