Saccadic movements during an exploratory visual search task in patients with glaucomatous visual field loss.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia Pub Date : 2024-03-22 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.5935/0004-2749.2022-0366
Mirella Almeida Oliveira, Cassia Senger, Raquel Pantojo Souza, Carlos Gustavo de Moraes, André Messias, Jayter Silva Paula
{"title":"Saccadic movements during an exploratory visual search task in patients with glaucomatous visual field loss.","authors":"Mirella Almeida Oliveira, Cassia Senger, Raquel Pantojo Souza, Carlos Gustavo de Moraes, André Messias, Jayter Silva Paula","doi":"10.5935/0004-2749.2022-0366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the saccadic movements of patients with visual field loss due to primary open-angle glaucoma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirteen patients with good visual acuity (0.2 logMAR or better) (seven patients with primary open-angle glaucoma 65 ± 13 years) and six controls (51 ± 6 years) yielded a comprehensive ophthalmological examination, including Humphrey Visual Field tests (SITA-Standard 24-2), and performed a monocular, exploratory digital visual search task that quantifies the duration for finding the number \"4\" on a random array of digits distributed on the screen. After individual adjustments of the angle and distance positioning, the screen was spatially matched with the 24-2 visual field, and divided into five areas for analysis. During the task, saccades were simultaneously recorded in the same eye with a video-based eye tracker.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The patients with primary open-angle glaucoma showed a significantly higher number of saccades/screen (median ± interquartile range, 59.00 ± 29.00 vs. 32.50 ± 19.75 saccades (p=0.027) and visual search time per screen (38.50 ± 60.14 vs. 23.75 ± 8.90 seconds (p=0.035) than the controls did. Although the univariate analysis indicated a significant correlation with visual field mean deviation (coefficient=26.19 (p=0.02), only the visual search time/screen was significantly associated with the number of saccades/screen in the multivariate regression model (coefficient=0.55 (p<0.001). Overall, no significant correlation was observed between the sectorial number of saccades and the sensitivity of the five visual field areas.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The patients with primary open-angle glaucoma show impaired search performance and showed a higher number of saccades needed to find stimuli when performing the exploratory visual task.</p>","PeriodicalId":8397,"journal":{"name":"Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia","volume":"87 3","pages":"e20220366"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5935/0004-2749.2022-0366","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the saccadic movements of patients with visual field loss due to primary open-angle glaucoma.

Methods: Thirteen patients with good visual acuity (0.2 logMAR or better) (seven patients with primary open-angle glaucoma 65 ± 13 years) and six controls (51 ± 6 years) yielded a comprehensive ophthalmological examination, including Humphrey Visual Field tests (SITA-Standard 24-2), and performed a monocular, exploratory digital visual search task that quantifies the duration for finding the number "4" on a random array of digits distributed on the screen. After individual adjustments of the angle and distance positioning, the screen was spatially matched with the 24-2 visual field, and divided into five areas for analysis. During the task, saccades were simultaneously recorded in the same eye with a video-based eye tracker.

Results: The patients with primary open-angle glaucoma showed a significantly higher number of saccades/screen (median ± interquartile range, 59.00 ± 29.00 vs. 32.50 ± 19.75 saccades (p=0.027) and visual search time per screen (38.50 ± 60.14 vs. 23.75 ± 8.90 seconds (p=0.035) than the controls did. Although the univariate analysis indicated a significant correlation with visual field mean deviation (coefficient=26.19 (p=0.02), only the visual search time/screen was significantly associated with the number of saccades/screen in the multivariate regression model (coefficient=0.55 (p<0.001). Overall, no significant correlation was observed between the sectorial number of saccades and the sensitivity of the five visual field areas.

Conclusions: The patients with primary open-angle glaucoma show impaired search performance and showed a higher number of saccades needed to find stimuli when performing the exploratory visual task.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
青光眼视野缺损患者在探索性视觉搜索任务中的回旋运动。
目的:评估原发性开角型青光眼视野缺损患者的眼球回视运动:13 名视力良好(0.2 logMAR 或更好)的患者(7 名原发性开角型青光眼患者,65 ± 13 岁)和 6 名对照组患者(51 ± 6 岁)接受了全面的眼科检查,包括汉弗莱视野测试(SITA-标准 24-2),并进行了单眼探索性数字视觉搜索任务,该任务量化了在屏幕上随机分布的数字阵列中找到数字 "4 "的持续时间。在对角度和距离定位进行单独调整后,屏幕在空间上与 24-2 视野相匹配,并分为五个区域进行分析。在完成任务的过程中,用视频眼动跟踪仪同时记录同一只眼睛的眼球移动:结果:与对照组相比,原发性开角型青光眼患者的囊回次数(中位数±四分位数范围,59.00 ± 29.00 vs. 32.50 ± 19.75囊回(P=0.027))和每屏视觉搜索时间(38.50 ± 60.14 vs. 23.75 ± 8.90秒(P=0.035))均明显高于对照组。虽然单变量分析显示与视野平均偏差有显著相关性(系数=26.19(P=0.02)),但在多变量回归模型中,只有视觉搜索时间/屏幕与囊回次数/屏幕有显著相关性(系数=0.55(P结论:原发性开角型青光眼患者的视觉搜索时间与囊回次数/屏幕有显著相关性:原发性开角型青光眼患者的搜索能力受损,在执行探索性视觉任务时需要更多的囊回才能找到刺激物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
200
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The ABO-ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE OFTALMOLOGIA (ABO, ISSN 0004-2749 - print and ISSN 1678-2925 - (ABO, ISSN 0004-2749 - print and ISSN 1678-2925 - electronic version), the official bimonthly publication of the Brazilian Council of Ophthalmology (CBO), aims to disseminate scientific studies in Ophthalmology, Visual Science and Health public, by promoting research, improvement and updating of professionals related to the field.
期刊最新文献
Multiple visible retinal emboli in branch retinal artery occlusion secondary to internal carotid artery occlusion. Scientific impact factor versus social impact of journals. Why, what, and where to publish scientific research. Early visual intervention, visual function analysis, and grating visual acuity outcomes in children with congenital Zika syndrome. Prevalence of myopic eyes in private practice and public care services in Brazil: 11 years of retrospective analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1