Fine-needle aspiration cytology for neck lesions in patients with antithrombotic/anticoagulant medications: systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING European Radiology Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-27 DOI:10.1007/s00330-024-10709-4
Dongbin Ahn, Ji Hye Kwak, Gill Joon Lee, Jin Ho Sohn
{"title":"Fine-needle aspiration cytology for neck lesions in patients with antithrombotic/anticoagulant medications: systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Dongbin Ahn, Ji Hye Kwak, Gill Joon Lee, Jin Ho Sohn","doi":"10.1007/s00330-024-10709-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the true risk of bleeding and nondiagnostic (ND) specimens associated with fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) for neck lesions in patients taking antithrombotic/anticoagulation (AT/AC) medications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the Population Intervention Comparison and Outcome modeling, we searched PubMed and Google Scholar databases to identify studies published between January 2000 and March 2023 reporting the safety and sample adequacy of FNAC for neck lesions in patients taking AT/AC medications. The pooled incidences of bleeding and ND specimens and pooled risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) obtained using a fixed-effects model were compared for patients continuing AT/AC (AT/AC group) and patients not receiving AT/AC therapy (no-AT/AC group).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included six original articles involving a total of 3014 patients. The pooled incidence of bleeding was 0.9% (95% CI, 0.344-2.026) and 0.7% (95% CI, 0.390-1.146) in the AT/AC and no-AT/AC groups, respectively. The pooled RR under the fixed-effects model was 1.39 (95% CI, 0.56-3.44) with no evidence of between-study heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup> = 0.0%; p = 0.92). The pooled incidence of ND specimens was 7.6% (95% CI, 5.617-10.073) and 7.6% (95% CI, 6.511-8.752) in the AT/AC and no-AT/AC groups, respectively. The pooled RR under the fixed-effects model was 1.33 (95% CI, 0.98-1.81) with moderate between-study heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup> = 60.0%; p = 0.06).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The AT/AC medication is not associated with increased risk of bleeding or ND specimens in FNAC for neck lesions. Therefore, interruption of the AT/AC medication is not recommended before FNAC even in patients taking AT/AC medications.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance statement: </strong>This study is the first meta-analysis evaluating risk of bleeding and nondiagnostic specimens associated with fine-needle cytology for neck lesions in patients taking antithrombotic/anticoagulation (AT/AC) medications. This suggests withholding AT/AC medications is not mandatory for safe and diagnostic FNACs.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>• True risk of fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) for neck lesions in patients taking antithrombotic/anticoagulation (AT/AC) medications is still controversial. • This meta-analysis demonstrated that maintaining AT/AC medication was not associated with increased risk in terms of both bleeding and nondiagnostic samples. • Interruption of the AT/AC medication is not needed for safe and diagnostic FNAC for neck lesions even in patients taking AT/AC medications.</p>","PeriodicalId":12076,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-024-10709-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the true risk of bleeding and nondiagnostic (ND) specimens associated with fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) for neck lesions in patients taking antithrombotic/anticoagulation (AT/AC) medications.

Methods: Using the Population Intervention Comparison and Outcome modeling, we searched PubMed and Google Scholar databases to identify studies published between January 2000 and March 2023 reporting the safety and sample adequacy of FNAC for neck lesions in patients taking AT/AC medications. The pooled incidences of bleeding and ND specimens and pooled risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) obtained using a fixed-effects model were compared for patients continuing AT/AC (AT/AC group) and patients not receiving AT/AC therapy (no-AT/AC group).

Results: We included six original articles involving a total of 3014 patients. The pooled incidence of bleeding was 0.9% (95% CI, 0.344-2.026) and 0.7% (95% CI, 0.390-1.146) in the AT/AC and no-AT/AC groups, respectively. The pooled RR under the fixed-effects model was 1.39 (95% CI, 0.56-3.44) with no evidence of between-study heterogeneity (I2 = 0.0%; p = 0.92). The pooled incidence of ND specimens was 7.6% (95% CI, 5.617-10.073) and 7.6% (95% CI, 6.511-8.752) in the AT/AC and no-AT/AC groups, respectively. The pooled RR under the fixed-effects model was 1.33 (95% CI, 0.98-1.81) with moderate between-study heterogeneity (I2 = 60.0%; p = 0.06).

Conclusions: The AT/AC medication is not associated with increased risk of bleeding or ND specimens in FNAC for neck lesions. Therefore, interruption of the AT/AC medication is not recommended before FNAC even in patients taking AT/AC medications.

Clinical relevance statement: This study is the first meta-analysis evaluating risk of bleeding and nondiagnostic specimens associated with fine-needle cytology for neck lesions in patients taking antithrombotic/anticoagulation (AT/AC) medications. This suggests withholding AT/AC medications is not mandatory for safe and diagnostic FNACs.

Key points: • True risk of fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) for neck lesions in patients taking antithrombotic/anticoagulation (AT/AC) medications is still controversial. • This meta-analysis demonstrated that maintaining AT/AC medication was not associated with increased risk in terms of both bleeding and nondiagnostic samples. • Interruption of the AT/AC medication is not needed for safe and diagnostic FNAC for neck lesions even in patients taking AT/AC medications.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
抗血栓/抗凝药物患者颈部病变的细针穿刺细胞学检查:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
研究目的本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在确定服用抗血栓/抗凝(AT/AC)药物的患者在进行颈部病变的细针穿刺细胞学检查(FNAC)时出血和无诊断(ND)标本的真实风险:利用人群干预比较和结果模型,我们检索了 PubMed 和 Google Scholar 数据库,以确定 2000 年 1 月至 2023 年 3 月间发表的、报道服用 AT/AC 药物的患者进行颈部病变 FNAC 的安全性和样本充分性的研究。采用固定效应模型比较了继续接受AT/AC治疗的患者(AT/AC组)和未接受AT/AC治疗的患者(无AT/AC组)的出血和ND标本的集合发生率以及集合风险比(RR)和95%置信区间(CI):我们收录了六篇原创文章,共涉及 3014 名患者。AT/AC组和未接受AT/AC组的出血总发生率分别为0.9%(95% CI,0.344-2.026)和0.7%(95% CI,0.390-1.146)。固定效应模型下的总RR为1.39(95% CI,0.56-3.44),无证据表明研究间存在异质性(I2 = 0.0%;P = 0.92)。AT/AC组和无AT/AC组ND标本的汇总发病率分别为7.6%(95% CI,5.617-10.073)和7.6%(95% CI,6.511-8.752)。在固定效应模型下,汇总的RR为1.33(95% CI,0.98-1.81),研究间存在中度异质性(I2 = 60.0%;P = 0.06):AT/AC药物与颈部病变FNAC出血或ND标本风险增加无关。因此,即使是服用 AT/AC 药物的患者,也不建议在 FNAC 前中断 AT/AC 药物:本研究是首次对服用抗血栓/抗凝血药物(AT/AC)的患者进行颈部病变细针细胞学检查时的出血风险和无诊断标本进行评估的荟萃分析。这表明,要进行安全和诊断性的细针穿刺细胞学检查,并非必须暂停服用 AT/AC 药物:- 服用抗血栓/抗凝(AT/AC)药物的患者进行颈部病变细针穿刺细胞学检查(FNAC)的真正风险仍存在争议。- 这项荟萃分析表明,在出血和非诊断样本方面,持续服用 AT/AC 药物与风险增加无关。- 即使是服用 AT/AC 药物的患者,也不需要中断 AT/AC 药物,就能安全地对颈部病变进行 FNAC 诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Radiology
European Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.50%
发文量
874
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: European Radiology (ER) continuously updates scientific knowledge in radiology by publication of strong original articles and state-of-the-art reviews written by leading radiologists. A well balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes ER an indispensable source for current information in this field. This is the Journal of the European Society of Radiology, and the official journal of a number of societies. From 2004-2008 supplements to European Radiology were published under its companion, European Radiology Supplements, ISSN 1613-3749.
期刊最新文献
Reply to Letter to the Editor: "Ultra-low-dose vs. standard-of-care-dose CT of the chest in patients with post-COVID-19 conditions-a prospective intra-patient multi-reader study". Interval breast cancer rates for tomosynthesis vs mammography population screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. Letter to the Editor: "Ultra-low-dose vs standard-of-care-dose CT of the chest in patients with post-COVID-19 conditions-a prospective intra-patient multi-reader study". Alveolar membrane and capillary function in COVID-19 convalescents: insights from chest MRI. High-performance presurgical differentiation of glioblastoma and metastasis by means of multiparametric neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI) radiomics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1