The effects of flow settings during high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy for neonates and young children.

IF 9 1区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM European Respiratory Review Pub Date : 2024-03-27 Print Date: 2024-01-31 DOI:10.1183/16000617.0223-2023
Jie Li, Ni Deng, Wan Jia Aaron He, Cui Yang, Pan Liu, Fai A Albuainain, Brian J Ring, Andrew G Miller, Alexandre T Rotta, Robert D Guglielmo, Christophe Milési
{"title":"The effects of flow settings during high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy for neonates and young children.","authors":"Jie Li, Ni Deng, Wan Jia Aaron He, Cui Yang, Pan Liu, Fai A Albuainain, Brian J Ring, Andrew G Miller, Alexandre T Rotta, Robert D Guglielmo, Christophe Milési","doi":"10.1183/16000617.0223-2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>During neonatal and paediatric high-flow nasal cannula therapy, optimising the flow setting is crucial for favourable physiological and clinical outcomes. However, considerable variability exists in clinical practice regarding initial flows and subsequent adjustments for these patients. Our review aimed to summarise the impact of various flows during high-flow nasal cannula treatment in neonates and children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two investigators independently searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus and Cochrane for <i>in vitro</i> and <i>in vivo</i> studies published in English before 30 April 2023. Studies enrolling adults (≥18 years) or those using a single flow setting were excluded. Data extraction and risk of bias assessments were performed independently by two investigators. The study protocol was prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022345419).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>38 406 studies were identified, with 44 included. <i>In vitro</i> studies explored flow settings' effects on airway pressures, humidity and carbon dioxide clearance; all were flow-dependent. Observational clinical studies consistently reported that higher flows led to increased pharyngeal pressure and potentially increased intrathoracic airway pressure (especially among neonates), improved oxygenation, and reduced respiratory rate and work of breathing up to a certain threshold. Three randomised controlled trials found no significant differences in treatment failure among different flow settings. Flow impacts exhibited significant heterogeneity among different patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Individualising flow settings in neonates and young children requires consideration of the patient's peak inspiratory flow, respiratory rate, heart rate, tolerance, work of breathing and lung aeration for optimal care.</p>","PeriodicalId":12166,"journal":{"name":"European Respiratory Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10966474/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Respiratory Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0223-2023","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: During neonatal and paediatric high-flow nasal cannula therapy, optimising the flow setting is crucial for favourable physiological and clinical outcomes. However, considerable variability exists in clinical practice regarding initial flows and subsequent adjustments for these patients. Our review aimed to summarise the impact of various flows during high-flow nasal cannula treatment in neonates and children.

Methods: Two investigators independently searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus and Cochrane for in vitro and in vivo studies published in English before 30 April 2023. Studies enrolling adults (≥18 years) or those using a single flow setting were excluded. Data extraction and risk of bias assessments were performed independently by two investigators. The study protocol was prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022345419).

Results: 38 406 studies were identified, with 44 included. In vitro studies explored flow settings' effects on airway pressures, humidity and carbon dioxide clearance; all were flow-dependent. Observational clinical studies consistently reported that higher flows led to increased pharyngeal pressure and potentially increased intrathoracic airway pressure (especially among neonates), improved oxygenation, and reduced respiratory rate and work of breathing up to a certain threshold. Three randomised controlled trials found no significant differences in treatment failure among different flow settings. Flow impacts exhibited significant heterogeneity among different patients.

Conclusion: Individualising flow settings in neonates and young children requires consideration of the patient's peak inspiratory flow, respiratory rate, heart rate, tolerance, work of breathing and lung aeration for optimal care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新生儿和幼儿接受高流量鼻插管氧疗时流量设置的影响。
背景:在新生儿和儿科高流量鼻插管治疗过程中,优化流量设置对于取得良好的生理和临床效果至关重要。然而,在临床实践中,这些患者的初始流量和后续调整存在很大差异。我们的综述旨在总结新生儿和儿童高流量鼻插管治疗期间各种流量的影响:两名研究人员独立检索了 PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、Scopus 和 Cochrane,以查找 2023 年 4 月 30 日之前发表的体外和体内英文研究。排除了纳入成人(≥18 岁)或使用单一流程设置的研究。数据提取和偏倚风险评估由两名研究人员独立完成。研究方案在 PROSPERO(CRD42022345419)上进行了前瞻性注册:结果:共确定了 38 406 项研究,其中 44 项被纳入。体外研究探讨了流量设置对气道压力、湿度和二氧化碳清除率的影响;所有研究都与流量有关。临床观察研究一致报告称,流量越大,咽部压力越高,胸腔内气道压力也有可能增加(尤其是新生儿),氧合状况改善,呼吸频率和呼吸功降低,达到一定临界值。三项随机对照试验发现,不同流量设置对治疗失败的影响没有显著差异。不同患者对流量的影响表现出明显的异质性:新生儿和幼儿的个性化流量设置需要考虑患者的吸气峰值流量、呼吸频率、心率、耐受性、呼吸功和肺通气情况,以获得最佳护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Respiratory Review
European Respiratory Review Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
1.30%
发文量
91
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Respiratory Review (ERR) is an open-access journal published by the European Respiratory Society (ERS), serving as a vital resource for respiratory professionals by delivering updates on medicine, science, and surgery in the field. ERR features state-of-the-art review articles, editorials, correspondence, and summaries of recent research findings and studies covering a wide range of topics including COPD, asthma, pulmonary hypertension, interstitial lung disease, lung cancer, tuberculosis, and pulmonary infections. Articles are published continuously and compiled into quarterly issues within a single annual volume.
期刊最新文献
Antibody-mediated protection against respiratory syncytial virus in children. Epidemiology of bronchiectasis. Epidemiology of severe asthma in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Impaired lung function and associated risk factors in children born prematurely: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Noninvasive diagnostic modalities and prediction models for detecting pulmonary hypertension associated with interstitial lung disease: a narrative review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1