The Effects of Gluten-free Diet on Body Mass Indexes in Adults with Celiac Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Journal of clinical gastroenterology Pub Date : 2024-03-27 DOI:10.1097/MCG.0000000000001998
Noam Peleg, Yaron Niv, Ram Dickman, Doron Boltin, Alex Krauthammer, Michal Herman-Edelstein, Nidal Issa, Jacob E Ollech, Tom Konikoff, Rachel Gingold-Belfer
{"title":"The Effects of Gluten-free Diet on Body Mass Indexes in Adults with Celiac Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies.","authors":"Noam Peleg, Yaron Niv, Ram Dickman, Doron Boltin, Alex Krauthammer, Michal Herman-Edelstein, Nidal Issa, Jacob E Ollech, Tom Konikoff, Rachel Gingold-Belfer","doi":"10.1097/MCG.0000000000001998","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Goals and background: </strong>Gluten-free diet (GFD) includes a higher intake of sugars and fats. Previous studies have investigated its effect on body mass index (BMI) in celiac disease (CD) patients but had contradictive conclusions. Thus, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis examining the effect of GFD on BMI in CD patients.</p><p><strong>Study: </strong>Systematically, we conducted literature research using Medline, Scopus, and Embase, and we identified 1565 potential studies/abstracts. Only studies of patients with CD under a GFD with recorded BMI before and after dietary intervention were included. Subgroup analyses based on study design and BMI categories were performed. We calculated the pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (Cls) for the number of patients in each BMI group according to the World Health Organization (WHO) definitions after GFD using fixed and random effect meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis included 10 studies and 38 sub-studies/data sets, which encompassed 2450 patients from 5 countries. We found nonsignificant odds for changing the BMI group (pooled OR 0.972, 95% CI: 0.858-1.101, P=0.65) after GFD. However, looking specifically at BMI subgroups, we found higher odds for BMI category change after GFD in underweight patients (OR 0.588, 95% CI: 0.479-0.723, P <0.001), and overweight patients,25<BMI<30, (OR 1.332, 95% CI: 1.167-1.521, P<0.001). No publication bias was demonstrated, and the amount of heterogeneity between studies was moderate (I2=54.13).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although crucial in patients with CD, GFD is associated with increased BMI in some CD patient populations. Accordingly, special considerations and follow-up should be maintained in overweight patients with CD after GFD.</p>","PeriodicalId":15457,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical gastroenterology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0000000000001998","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Goals and background: Gluten-free diet (GFD) includes a higher intake of sugars and fats. Previous studies have investigated its effect on body mass index (BMI) in celiac disease (CD) patients but had contradictive conclusions. Thus, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis examining the effect of GFD on BMI in CD patients.

Study: Systematically, we conducted literature research using Medline, Scopus, and Embase, and we identified 1565 potential studies/abstracts. Only studies of patients with CD under a GFD with recorded BMI before and after dietary intervention were included. Subgroup analyses based on study design and BMI categories were performed. We calculated the pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (Cls) for the number of patients in each BMI group according to the World Health Organization (WHO) definitions after GFD using fixed and random effect meta-analysis.

Results: The analysis included 10 studies and 38 sub-studies/data sets, which encompassed 2450 patients from 5 countries. We found nonsignificant odds for changing the BMI group (pooled OR 0.972, 95% CI: 0.858-1.101, P=0.65) after GFD. However, looking specifically at BMI subgroups, we found higher odds for BMI category change after GFD in underweight patients (OR 0.588, 95% CI: 0.479-0.723, P <0.001), and overweight patients,25

Conclusion: Although crucial in patients with CD, GFD is associated with increased BMI in some CD patient populations. Accordingly, special considerations and follow-up should be maintained in overweight patients with CD after GFD.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无麸质饮食对乳糜泻成人体重指数的影响:观察性研究的系统回顾与元分析》。
目标和背景:无麸质饮食(GFD)包括较高的糖和脂肪摄入量。以往的研究调查了无麸质饮食对乳糜泻(CD)患者体重指数(BMI)的影响,但得出的结论相互矛盾。因此,我们对 GFD 对 CD 患者体重指数的影响进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析:研究:我们使用 Medline、Scopus 和 Embase 进行了系统的文献研究,并确定了 1565 项潜在的研究/摘要。研究:我们利用 Medline、Scopus 和 Embase 进行了系统性的文献研究,共发现了 1565 项潜在研究/摘要,其中仅包括对 CD 患者进行 GFD 并记录饮食干预前后 BMI 的研究。根据研究设计和 BMI 类别进行了分组分析。我们采用固定效应和随机效应荟萃分析法,根据世界卫生组织(WHO)的定义计算了GFD后各BMI组患者人数的汇总几率比(ORs)和95%置信区间(Cls):分析包括 10 项研究和 38 个子研究/数据集,涵盖来自 5 个国家的 2450 名患者。我们发现,在接受胃食管反流治疗后,改变 BMI 组别的几率并不显著(汇总 OR 0.972,95% CI:0.858-1.101,P=0.65)。然而,具体到 BMI 亚组,我们发现体重不足的患者在接受 GFD 后 BMI 类别发生变化的几率更高(OR 0.588,95% CI:0.479-0.723,P 结论:虽然 GFD 对 CD 患者至关重要,但其对患者体重的影响也不容忽视:尽管 GFD 对 CD 患者至关重要,但在某些 CD 患者群体中,GFD 与 BMI 增加有关。因此,超重的 CD 患者在接受 GFD 后应特别注意并进行随访。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of clinical gastroenterology
Journal of clinical gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
339
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology gathers the world''s latest, most relevant clinical studies and reviews, case reports, and technical expertise in a single source. Regular features include cutting-edge, peer-reviewed articles and clinical reviews that put the latest research and development into the context of your practice. Also included are biographies, focused organ reviews, practice management, and therapeutic recommendations.
期刊最新文献
Clinical Impact of High-dose Esomeprazole-amoxicillin Dual Therapy as Rescue Treatment for Helicobacter pylori Infection: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Trial. Efficacy and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Liver Cirrhosis. Prevalence and Pathophysiology of Loose Stools and Their Impact on Clinical Severity and Quality of Life in Women With Fecal Incontinence. Brain Fog in Gastrointestinal Disorders: Small Intestinal Bacterial Overgrowth, Gastroparesis, Irritable Bowel Syndrome. Strategies, Technologies, and Tips for Successful Cecal Intubation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1