Comparison of Body Temperature Values Measured With Noncontact Forehead Thermometer and Tympanic Thermometer in Adult Individuals.

IF 0.7 Q4 NURSING Journal of nursing measurement Pub Date : 2024-03-27 DOI:10.1891/JNM-2023-0035
Sevgi Dogan, Gülçin Avşar
{"title":"Comparison of Body Temperature Values Measured With Noncontact Forehead Thermometer and Tympanic Thermometer in Adult Individuals.","authors":"Sevgi Dogan, Gülçin Avşar","doi":"10.1891/JNM-2023-0035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background and Purpose:</b> Noncontact forehead thermometers have become increasingly widespread because of their advantages, such as rapid measurement of temperature, noninvasiveness, ease of use, and portability. The aim of the study was to compare the body temperature values measured using a noncontact forehead thermometer and a tympanic thermometer. <b>Methods:</b> A cross-sectional, comparative, and quasiexperimental research design was used in this study. The research population was composed of 200 adult individuals older than 18 years who were being treated at the hospital between January 2015 and March 2015. The temperature and humidity of the environment were measured with an electronic thermo-hygrometer. The body temperature of the patient was measured with both a noncontact forehead thermometer and a tympanic thermometer by the same researcher. The data were recorded in the patient information form and the patient observation form. <b>Results:</b> Mean body temperature values measured with a noncontact forehead thermometer and a tympanic thermometer were 36.17°C ± 0.47°C and 36.89°C ± 0.44°C, respectively. Results showed that there was no clear relationship between differences and averages, and there was conformity between the two methods. <b>Conclusions:</b> The mean forehead temperature is lower than the tympanic temperature, and there is conformity between the two methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":16585,"journal":{"name":"Journal of nursing measurement","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of nursing measurement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1891/JNM-2023-0035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Purpose: Noncontact forehead thermometers have become increasingly widespread because of their advantages, such as rapid measurement of temperature, noninvasiveness, ease of use, and portability. The aim of the study was to compare the body temperature values measured using a noncontact forehead thermometer and a tympanic thermometer. Methods: A cross-sectional, comparative, and quasiexperimental research design was used in this study. The research population was composed of 200 adult individuals older than 18 years who were being treated at the hospital between January 2015 and March 2015. The temperature and humidity of the environment were measured with an electronic thermo-hygrometer. The body temperature of the patient was measured with both a noncontact forehead thermometer and a tympanic thermometer by the same researcher. The data were recorded in the patient information form and the patient observation form. Results: Mean body temperature values measured with a noncontact forehead thermometer and a tympanic thermometer were 36.17°C ± 0.47°C and 36.89°C ± 0.44°C, respectively. Results showed that there was no clear relationship between differences and averages, and there was conformity between the two methods. Conclusions: The mean forehead temperature is lower than the tympanic temperature, and there is conformity between the two methods.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用非接触式额温计和耳温计测量成人体温值的比较。
背景和目的:非接触式前额体温计具有快速测量体温、无创伤、使用方便和便携等优点,因此越来越广泛地应用于临床。本研究旨在比较使用非接触式前额温度计和耳温计测量的体温值。研究方法本研究采用横断面、比较和准实验研究设计。研究对象为 2015 年 1 月至 2015 年 3 月期间在医院接受治疗的 200 名 18 岁以上的成年人。使用电子温湿度计测量了环境的温度和湿度。同一研究人员使用非接触式前额温度计和耳温计测量患者体温。数据记录在患者信息表和患者观察表中。结果使用非接触式前额温度计和鼓膜温度计测量的平均体温值分别为 36.17°C ± 0.47°C 和 36.89°C ± 0.44°C。结果表明,差异和平均值之间没有明显的关系,两种方法之间存在一致性。结论:前额温度的平均值低于鼓室温度,两种方法之间存在一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nursing Measurement specifically addresses instrumentation in nursing. It serves as a prime forum for disseminating information on instruments, tools, approaches, and procedures developed or utilized for measuring variables in nursing research, practice, and education. Particular emphasis is placed on evidence for the reliability and validity or sensitivity and specificity of such instruments. The journal includes innovative discussions of theories, principles, practices, and issues relevant to nursing measurement.
期刊最新文献
Validity and Reliability of the Persian Version of the Scale of the Assessment of Self-Care Behaviors With Arteriovenous Fistula in Patients on Hemodialysis. Actigraphy: An Adjunctive Method to Measure Irritability in Opioid-Exposed Newborns. Development and Psychometric Properties of the Brain Drain Questionnaire for Nurses. Validation of the Nursing Student Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Insertion Self-Confidence Scale. Use of the Rasch Model for Fit Statistics and Rating Scale Diagnosis for the Student Perception Appraisal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1