Effect of ultrasound-guided lung recruitment to reduce pulmonary atelectasis after non-cardiac surgery under general anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Perioperative Medicine Pub Date : 2024-03-27 DOI:10.1186/s13741-024-00379-7
Bucheng Liao, Wuhao Liao, Shuang Yin, Shujuan Liu, Xinhai Wu
{"title":"Effect of ultrasound-guided lung recruitment to reduce pulmonary atelectasis after non-cardiac surgery under general anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Bucheng Liao, Wuhao Liao, Shuang Yin, Shujuan Liu, Xinhai Wu","doi":"10.1186/s13741-024-00379-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>At present, the application of bedside lung ultrasound is increasing gradually, but there is no relevant expert consensus or guidance for its evaluation in the field of perioperative anesthesia. Through this meta-analysis, we tried to determine the impact of ultrasound-guided lung recruitment maneuvers (LRM) on perioperative patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library database, Embase, and Clinical Trials gov for the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published up to December 31, 2022. The primary outcome was the incidence of postoperative atelectasis. Secondary outcomes included lung ultrasound score (LUS) and LUS of each part. A total of 443 patients were examined in nine randomized controlled trials.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence of atelectasis after surgery in patients with ultrasound-guided LRM was less (RR 0.31; 95% CI 0.25-0.40; p < 0.05). The LUS (WMD - 6.24; 95% CI - 6.90-5.59; p < 0.05) and the LUS of each part (LUS in front lung region (WMD - 2.00; 95% CI - 2.49 to - 1.51; p < 0.05); LUS in lateral lung region (WMD - 2.50; 95% CI - 3.20 to - 1.80; p < 0.05); LUS in posterior lung region (WMD - 3.24; 95% CI - 4.23 to - 2.24; p < 0.05)) in patients with ultrasound-guided LRM were lower.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ultrasound-guided lung recruitment maneuvers have been shown to be a promising approach for improving perioperative lung ventilation by increasing aeration while mitigating the development of atelectasis. In comparison to non-ultrasound-guided methods, this technique has exhibited superior effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":19764,"journal":{"name":"Perioperative Medicine","volume":"13 1","pages":"23"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10967192/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perioperative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13741-024-00379-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: At present, the application of bedside lung ultrasound is increasing gradually, but there is no relevant expert consensus or guidance for its evaluation in the field of perioperative anesthesia. Through this meta-analysis, we tried to determine the impact of ultrasound-guided lung recruitment maneuvers (LRM) on perioperative patients.

Methods: We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library database, Embase, and Clinical Trials gov for the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published up to December 31, 2022. The primary outcome was the incidence of postoperative atelectasis. Secondary outcomes included lung ultrasound score (LUS) and LUS of each part. A total of 443 patients were examined in nine randomized controlled trials.

Results: The incidence of atelectasis after surgery in patients with ultrasound-guided LRM was less (RR 0.31; 95% CI 0.25-0.40; p < 0.05). The LUS (WMD - 6.24; 95% CI - 6.90-5.59; p < 0.05) and the LUS of each part (LUS in front lung region (WMD - 2.00; 95% CI - 2.49 to - 1.51; p < 0.05); LUS in lateral lung region (WMD - 2.50; 95% CI - 3.20 to - 1.80; p < 0.05); LUS in posterior lung region (WMD - 3.24; 95% CI - 4.23 to - 2.24; p < 0.05)) in patients with ultrasound-guided LRM were lower.

Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided lung recruitment maneuvers have been shown to be a promising approach for improving perioperative lung ventilation by increasing aeration while mitigating the development of atelectasis. In comparison to non-ultrasound-guided methods, this technique has exhibited superior effects.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在全身麻醉下进行非心脏手术后,超声引导肺募集对减少肺不张的效果:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:目前,床旁肺部超声的应用正在逐渐增加,但在围术期麻醉领域对其评估尚无相关的专家共识或指导。通过这项荟萃分析,我们试图确定超声引导下肺募集操作(LRM)对围手术期患者的影响:我们检索了 PubMed、Cochrane 图书馆数据库、Embase 和 Clinical Trials gov 中截至 2022 年 12 月 31 日发表的随机对照试验 (RCT)。主要结果是术后肺不张的发生率。次要结果包括肺部超声评分(LUS)和各部位的LUS。9项随机对照试验共研究了443名患者:结果:接受超声引导肺复张术的患者术后发生肺不张的几率较低(RR 0.31;95% CI 0.25-0.40;P 结论:超声引导肺复张术的患者术后发生肺不张的几率较低(RR 0.31;95% CI 0.25-0.40):超声引导下的肺募集操作可增加通气量,同时减少肺不张的发生,是改善围手术期肺通气的有效方法。与非超声引导方法相比,该技术显示出更优越的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
3.80%
发文量
55
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Artificial intelligence in anesthesiology: a bibliometric analysis. The relationship between preoperative anemia and length of hospital stay among patients undergoing orthopedic surgery at a teaching hospital in Ethiopia: a retrospective cohort study. Excess hospital length of stay and extra cost attributable to primary prolonged postoperative ileus in open alimentary tract surgery: a multicenter cohort analysis in China. Investigating the effects of pressure support ventilation and positive end-expiratory pressure during extubation on respiratory system complications. The current situation and associated factors of preoperative frailty in elderly patients undergoing abdominal surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1