Pre-incisional local infiltration with levobupivacaine in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized and clinical trial.

Jorge Herrador-Benito, Javier Páramo-Zunzunegui, Gil Rodríguez-Caravaca, Manuel Durán-Poveda
{"title":"Pre-incisional local infiltration with levobupivacaine in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized and clinical trial.","authors":"Jorge Herrador-Benito, Javier Páramo-Zunzunegui, Gil Rodríguez-Caravaca, Manuel Durán-Poveda","doi":"10.24875/CIRU.230000221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), despite its minimally invasive nature, requires effective control of post-operative pain. The use of local anesthetics (LA) has been studied, but the level of evidence is low, and there is little information on important parameters such as health-related quality of life (HRQoL) or return to work. The objective of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of 0.50% levobupivacaine infiltration of incisional sites in reducing POP after LC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Patients undergoing elective LC were randomized into two groups: no infiltration (control group) and port infiltration (intervention group). POP intensity (numerical rating scale, NRS), need for rescue with opioid drugs, PONV incidence, HRQoL, and return to work data, among others, were studied.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred and twelve patients were randomized and analyzed: 105 (control group) and 107 (intervention group). A significant difference was observed in the NRS values (control group mean NRS score: 3.41 ± 1.82 vs. 2.56 ± 1.96) (p < 0.05) and in the incidence of PONV (31.4% vs. 19.6%) (p = 0.049).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Levobupivacaine infiltration is safe and effective in reducing POP, although this does not lead to a shorter hospital stay and does not influence HRQoL, return to work, or overall patient satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":93936,"journal":{"name":"Cirugia y cirujanos","volume":"92 1","pages":"69-76"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cirugia y cirujanos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24875/CIRU.230000221","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), despite its minimally invasive nature, requires effective control of post-operative pain. The use of local anesthetics (LA) has been studied, but the level of evidence is low, and there is little information on important parameters such as health-related quality of life (HRQoL) or return to work. The objective of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of 0.50% levobupivacaine infiltration of incisional sites in reducing POP after LC.

Methods: This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Patients undergoing elective LC were randomized into two groups: no infiltration (control group) and port infiltration (intervention group). POP intensity (numerical rating scale, NRS), need for rescue with opioid drugs, PONV incidence, HRQoL, and return to work data, among others, were studied.

Results: Two hundred and twelve patients were randomized and analyzed: 105 (control group) and 107 (intervention group). A significant difference was observed in the NRS values (control group mean NRS score: 3.41 ± 1.82 vs. 2.56 ± 1.96) (p < 0.05) and in the incidence of PONV (31.4% vs. 19.6%) (p = 0.049).

Conclusions: Levobupivacaine infiltration is safe and effective in reducing POP, although this does not lead to a shorter hospital stay and does not influence HRQoL, return to work, or overall patient satisfaction.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在腹腔镜胆囊切除术中使用左旋布比卡因进行切口前局部浸润:随机临床试验。
目的:腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)尽管是微创手术,但需要有效控制术后疼痛。目前已对局部麻醉剂(LA)的使用进行了研究,但证据水平较低,关于健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)或重返工作岗位等重要参数的信息也很少。本研究旨在评估 0.50% 左布比卡因浸润切口部位对减少 LC 后 POP 的疗效:这是一项前瞻性、随机、双盲研究。方法:这是一项前瞻性随机双盲研究,将接受择期 LC 的患者随机分为两组:无浸润组(对照组)和切口浸润组(干预组)。研究内容包括 POP 强度(数字评分量表,NRS)、使用阿片类药物抢救的需求、PONV 发生率、HRQoL 和重返工作岗位数据等:对 212 名患者进行了随机分组和分析:105 人(对照组)和 107 人(干预组)。在 NRS 值(对照组平均 NRS 得分:3.41 ± 1.82 vs. 2.56 ± 1.96)(p < 0.05)和 PONV 发生率(31.4% vs. 19.6%)(p = 0.049)方面观察到明显差异:左旋布比卡因浸润在减少 POP 方面安全有效,但这并不会缩短住院时间,也不会影响 HRQoL、重返工作岗位或患者总体满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Hepatocellular carcinoma in a high-complexity public center in Argentina: epidemiological characteristics and therapeutic outcomes]. [Hearing changes in pediatric cancer patients treated with cisplatin]. Kaiser model-based hazard vulnerability analysis in event risk assessment and emergency management of operating room in a hospital in China. The relationship between systemic inflammation response index and clinical and histopathological features in gastric cancer. A marker for acute cholecystitis severity: thiol-disulfide balance and ischemia-modified albumin.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1