{"title":"[The history of compensation system for workers with pneumoconiosis-related lung cancer].","authors":"Yoshimasa Ishii, Yoshiharu Aizawa, Takumi Kishimoto, Seichi Horie, Chikage Nagano, Hidesuke Shimizu","doi":"10.1539/sangyoeisei.2023-025-A","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To review the historical aspects of compensation system for workers with pneumoconiosis who developed lung cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Materials and papers published on the compensation system as discussed in administrative meetings were utilized.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Legal claims for compensation for lung cancer among individuals with pneumoconiosis increased during the period of rapid economic growth in Japan. A possible causal relationship between pneumoconiosis and lung cancer in workers has been discussed by committees of specialists. The Expert Committee on Pneumoconiosis and Lung Cancer in 1978 did not find a causal relationship between them. However, a survey of physicians specializing in pneumoconiosis revealed medical disadvantages among individuals diagnosed with pneumoconiosis who developed lung cancer. The Ministry of Labour announced the risk of work-related lung cancer in patients with advanced pneumoconiosis (class IV or equivalent severity). Since then, numerous lung cancer patients with pneumoconiosis have been adjudicated. In 1997, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) re-evaluated the carcinogenicity of silica and declared it to be a Group I carcinogen in humans. The Expert Committee on Compensation of Lung Cancer Cases Developing from Pneumoconiosis discussed the IARC evaluation but did not accept this classification. However, the Committee of Occupational Exposure Limits in the Japan Society of Occupational Health upheld the IARC evaluation of silica as a Group I carcinogen. Because the Expert Committee of Medical Disadvantage of Lung Cancer Patients with Pneumoconiosis accepted the increased risk of lung cancer in patients with class III or equivalent severity pneumoconiosis, the Ministry of Labour announced worker compensation for such patients. The Expert Committee of Health Control of Pneumoconiosis Complicated with Lung Cancer reported in 2002 that a meta-analysis revealed no increased risk of lung cancer among workers exposed to crystalline silica; however, there was an increased risk of lung cancer in patients with pneumoconiosis. The Ministry of Labour has added lung cancer to the list of complications from pneumoconiosis and, if necessary, regular medical checkups for lung cancer. After Leaving dust work, the Health Care System provides for workers who are diagnosed With class II or higher pneumoconiosis. Therefore, if an individual with pneumoconiosis develops class II or higher lung cancer, that individual becomes eligible for workers' compensation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The conclusion of the Expert Committee in 2002 and the decision of the Ministry of Labour to add lung cancer to its list of complications of pneumoconiosis are evaluated to be appropriate.</p>","PeriodicalId":94204,"journal":{"name":"Sangyo eiseigaku zasshi = Journal of occupational health","volume":" ","pages":"143-154"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sangyo eiseigaku zasshi = Journal of occupational health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1539/sangyoeisei.2023-025-A","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To review the historical aspects of compensation system for workers with pneumoconiosis who developed lung cancer.
Methods: Materials and papers published on the compensation system as discussed in administrative meetings were utilized.
Results: Legal claims for compensation for lung cancer among individuals with pneumoconiosis increased during the period of rapid economic growth in Japan. A possible causal relationship between pneumoconiosis and lung cancer in workers has been discussed by committees of specialists. The Expert Committee on Pneumoconiosis and Lung Cancer in 1978 did not find a causal relationship between them. However, a survey of physicians specializing in pneumoconiosis revealed medical disadvantages among individuals diagnosed with pneumoconiosis who developed lung cancer. The Ministry of Labour announced the risk of work-related lung cancer in patients with advanced pneumoconiosis (class IV or equivalent severity). Since then, numerous lung cancer patients with pneumoconiosis have been adjudicated. In 1997, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) re-evaluated the carcinogenicity of silica and declared it to be a Group I carcinogen in humans. The Expert Committee on Compensation of Lung Cancer Cases Developing from Pneumoconiosis discussed the IARC evaluation but did not accept this classification. However, the Committee of Occupational Exposure Limits in the Japan Society of Occupational Health upheld the IARC evaluation of silica as a Group I carcinogen. Because the Expert Committee of Medical Disadvantage of Lung Cancer Patients with Pneumoconiosis accepted the increased risk of lung cancer in patients with class III or equivalent severity pneumoconiosis, the Ministry of Labour announced worker compensation for such patients. The Expert Committee of Health Control of Pneumoconiosis Complicated with Lung Cancer reported in 2002 that a meta-analysis revealed no increased risk of lung cancer among workers exposed to crystalline silica; however, there was an increased risk of lung cancer in patients with pneumoconiosis. The Ministry of Labour has added lung cancer to the list of complications from pneumoconiosis and, if necessary, regular medical checkups for lung cancer. After Leaving dust work, the Health Care System provides for workers who are diagnosed With class II or higher pneumoconiosis. Therefore, if an individual with pneumoconiosis develops class II or higher lung cancer, that individual becomes eligible for workers' compensation.
Conclusions: The conclusion of the Expert Committee in 2002 and the decision of the Ministry of Labour to add lung cancer to its list of complications of pneumoconiosis are evaluated to be appropriate.
目的回顾尘肺病工人患肺癌后补偿制度的历史:方法:利用在行政会议上讨论的有关赔偿制度的资料和发表的论文:结果:在日本经济快速增长时期,尘肺病患者因肺癌而提出的法律索赔有所增加。专家委员会讨论了尘肺病与工人肺癌之间可能存在的因果关系。1978 年,尘肺病和肺癌专家委员会没有发现两者之间存在因果关系。然而,一项对尘肺病专科医生的调查显示,被诊断患有尘肺病并发展成肺癌的人在医疗上处于不利地位。劳动部公布了晚期尘肺病患者(四级或同等严重程度)患工作相关肺癌的风险。此后,许多肺癌患者被判定患有尘肺病。1997 年,国际癌症研究机构(IARC)重新评估了二氧化硅的致癌性,并宣布其为人类第一类致癌物质。肺尘埃沉着病肺癌病例赔偿专家委员会讨论了国际癌症研究机构的评估,但没有接受这一分类。不过,日本职业健康学会的职业接触限值委员会维持了国际癌症研究机构将二氧化硅列为 I 类致癌物的评价。由于尘肺病肺癌患者医疗劣势专家委员会承认 III 级或同等严重程度的尘肺病患者罹患肺癌的风险增加,劳动省宣布对这类患者给予工人补偿。肺尘埃沉着病并发肺癌健康控制专家委员会 2002 年报告说,一项荟萃分析表明,接触结晶硅的工人患肺癌的风险没有增加;但是,肺尘埃沉着病患者患肺癌的风险增加了。劳动部已将肺癌列入尘肺病并发症清单,如有必要,应定期进行肺癌体检。离开粉尘作业岗位后,医疗保健系统将为被诊断患有二级或二级以上尘肺病的工人提供医疗服务。因此,如果一个患有尘肺病的人患上 II 级或更高级别的肺癌,他就有资格获得工伤赔偿:专家委员会 2002 年的结论和劳动部将肺癌列入尘肺并发症清单的决定被认为是适当的。