Natural canal deviation and dentin thickness of mesial root canals of mandibular first molars assessed by microcomputed tomography.

Brazilian dental journal Pub Date : 2024-03-22 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1590/0103-6440202405648
Carolina Alonso Amorim, Marília F Marceliano-Alves, Isabelle Louise Gomes, José C Provenzano, Flávio R F Alves
{"title":"Natural canal deviation and dentin thickness of mesial root canals of mandibular first molars assessed by microcomputed tomography.","authors":"Carolina Alonso Amorim, Marília F Marceliano-Alves, Isabelle Louise Gomes, José C Provenzano, Flávio R F Alves","doi":"10.1590/0103-6440202405648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to assess the centralization and dentin thickness of mesial root canals of the first mandibular molars by microcomputed tomography (micro-CT). Material and methods: Ninety-nine mandibular molars of Vertucci's type IV canals were scanned by micro-CT. The mesiodistal deviation and centroid were assessed, in both mesiobuccal (MB) and mesiolingual (ML) canals, for the apical 4mm and the full canal length. Results: The dentin thickness was similar for both MB and ML canals. The narrowest thickness was in the distal wall of an MB canal (0.07mm), while the widest was found in the mesial wall of an MB canal (2.46mm). In centroid analysis, both the MB and ML canals exhibited deviations when compared to the root centroid, along the full canal length and the apical 4mm. For the MB canal, the mean deviation was 0.83mm (0.02 mm-2.30 mm) for the full canal and 0.18mm (0.01 mm-1.01 mm) for apical 4mm. Similarly, for the ML canal, the mean deviation measured 0.83 mm (0.05mm-3.99mm) for the full canal and 0.21 mm (0.01mm-1.01mm) for the apical 4 mm. Overall, deviations were observed towards the mesial of the roots, with 69% for MB and 57% for ML canals for the full canal, and 51% for MB canals within the 4 mm. The exception was the ML canal, which exhibited a higher deviation towards distal in the apical 4mm, accounting for 52% of cases. The dentin thickness was consistent between the mesial canals of mandibular molars. However, there is no centrality of mesial canals in their roots, with frequent deviation to mesial.</p>","PeriodicalId":101363,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian dental journal","volume":"35 ","pages":"e245648"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10976306/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian dental journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440202405648","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the centralization and dentin thickness of mesial root canals of the first mandibular molars by microcomputed tomography (micro-CT). Material and methods: Ninety-nine mandibular molars of Vertucci's type IV canals were scanned by micro-CT. The mesiodistal deviation and centroid were assessed, in both mesiobuccal (MB) and mesiolingual (ML) canals, for the apical 4mm and the full canal length. Results: The dentin thickness was similar for both MB and ML canals. The narrowest thickness was in the distal wall of an MB canal (0.07mm), while the widest was found in the mesial wall of an MB canal (2.46mm). In centroid analysis, both the MB and ML canals exhibited deviations when compared to the root centroid, along the full canal length and the apical 4mm. For the MB canal, the mean deviation was 0.83mm (0.02 mm-2.30 mm) for the full canal and 0.18mm (0.01 mm-1.01 mm) for apical 4mm. Similarly, for the ML canal, the mean deviation measured 0.83 mm (0.05mm-3.99mm) for the full canal and 0.21 mm (0.01mm-1.01mm) for the apical 4 mm. Overall, deviations were observed towards the mesial of the roots, with 69% for MB and 57% for ML canals for the full canal, and 51% for MB canals within the 4 mm. The exception was the ML canal, which exhibited a higher deviation towards distal in the apical 4mm, accounting for 52% of cases. The dentin thickness was consistent between the mesial canals of mandibular molars. However, there is no centrality of mesial canals in their roots, with frequent deviation to mesial.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过微型计算机断层扫描评估下颌第一磨牙中侧根管的自然偏差和牙本质厚度。
本研究的目的是通过微型计算机断层扫描(micro-CT)评估第一下颌磨牙中侧根管的集中度和牙本质厚度。材料和方法用显微计算机断层扫描法扫描了99颗下颌磨牙的Vertucci's IV型根管。评估了中颊面(MB)和中舌面(ML)根尖 4 毫米和整个根管长度的中轴偏差和中心点。结果:MB 和 ML 导管的牙本质厚度相似。牙本质厚度最窄的是 MB 管的远端壁(0.07 毫米),而最宽的是 MB 管的中侧壁(2.46 毫米)。在中心点分析中,与牙根中心点相比,MB 和 ML 根管在整个根管长度和根尖 4 毫米处都有偏差。MB 导管全长的平均偏差为 0.83 毫米(0.02 毫米-2.30 毫米),根尖 4 毫米的平均偏差为 0.18 毫米(0.01 毫米-1.01 毫米)。同样,对于 ML 管,全管的平均偏差为 0.83 毫米(0.05 毫米-3.99 毫米),顶端 4 毫米的平均偏差为 0.21 毫米(0.01 毫米-1.01 毫米)。总体而言,偏差是向牙根中侧偏移的,在整个根管中,MB 和 ML 根管的偏差分别为 69% 和 57%,在 4 毫米范围内,MB 根管的偏差为 51%。但 ML 管是个例外,在根尖 4 毫米处向远端偏离的比例较高,占 52%。下颌磨牙中轴管的牙本质厚度是一致的。然而,中轴管在牙根中并不居中,经常偏向中轴。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Investigation of genetic polymorphisms in interleukins associated with pain after root canal treatment. Whitening toothpastes are ineffective in recovering color from previous dental bleaching - In vitro study. Translation, adaptation, and preliminary psychometric evaluation of the PoSSe scale into brazilian portuguese. Improving fatigue behavior of CAD/CAM-ground 4YSZ via finishing, polishing, and surface treatments. In vitro performance of violet LED and argon plasma with oxygen on dentin bleaching.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1