Surface treatments of the zirconia-reinforced lithium disilicate ceramic in the adhesion to the resin cement.

Brazilian dental journal Pub Date : 2024-03-22 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1590/0103-6440202405674
Mirko A R Aguilera, Américo C Bortolazzo, Lourenço Correr-Sobrinho, Rafael L X Consani
{"title":"Surface treatments of the zirconia-reinforced lithium disilicate ceramic in the adhesion to the resin cement.","authors":"Mirko A R Aguilera, Américo C Bortolazzo, Lourenço Correr-Sobrinho, Rafael L X Consani","doi":"10.1590/0103-6440202405674","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study verified the effect of surface treatments of the zirconia-reinforced lithium disilicate ceramic bonded to resin cement. Ceramic blocks were divided according to treatments (n=10): FA+SRX (Fluoric acid + silane RX), FA+MDP (Fluoric acid + MDP), FA+SCF+MDP (Fluoric acid + silane CF + MDP), FA+MEP (Fluoric acid + MEP), and MEP (Self-etch primer). Resin cement cylinders were made in the ceramic blocks, photoactivated with 1,200 mW/cm² for 40s, stored in water at 37°C for 24h, and evaluated by the microshear strength test, optical failure descriptive analysis (%), surface characterization (SEM) and contact angle (Goniometer). Other samples were submitted to 10,000 thermocycles between 5°C and 55°C. Bond strength data were submitted to two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test. Contact angle to one-way ANOVA and Games-Howell's test (5%). At 24h, MEP showed higher bond strength, and FA+SRX the lower. FA+MDP and FA+SCF+MDP showed similar values and FA+MEP was intermediate. After thermocycling, FA+SCF+MDP, FA+MEP, and MEP showed higher values, and FA+SRX the lower while FA+MDP was intermediate. When the periods were compared, FA+MDP, FA+SCF+MDP, FA+MEP, and MEP showed higher values for 24h while FA+SRX was similar. SEM showed retentive surface and crystal exposure when treated with FA+SCF+MDP. The less retentive surface was obtained with MEP, and the other treatments promoted intermediate irregularities. In conclusion, surface treatment and thermocycling promoted different values of adhesive strength and contact angle in a zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramic. Failures were predominantly adhesive, and the ceramic surface was characterized by different levels of roughness and selective exposure of crystals.</p>","PeriodicalId":101363,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian dental journal","volume":"35 ","pages":"e245674"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10976312/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian dental journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440202405674","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study verified the effect of surface treatments of the zirconia-reinforced lithium disilicate ceramic bonded to resin cement. Ceramic blocks were divided according to treatments (n=10): FA+SRX (Fluoric acid + silane RX), FA+MDP (Fluoric acid + MDP), FA+SCF+MDP (Fluoric acid + silane CF + MDP), FA+MEP (Fluoric acid + MEP), and MEP (Self-etch primer). Resin cement cylinders were made in the ceramic blocks, photoactivated with 1,200 mW/cm² for 40s, stored in water at 37°C for 24h, and evaluated by the microshear strength test, optical failure descriptive analysis (%), surface characterization (SEM) and contact angle (Goniometer). Other samples were submitted to 10,000 thermocycles between 5°C and 55°C. Bond strength data were submitted to two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test. Contact angle to one-way ANOVA and Games-Howell's test (5%). At 24h, MEP showed higher bond strength, and FA+SRX the lower. FA+MDP and FA+SCF+MDP showed similar values and FA+MEP was intermediate. After thermocycling, FA+SCF+MDP, FA+MEP, and MEP showed higher values, and FA+SRX the lower while FA+MDP was intermediate. When the periods were compared, FA+MDP, FA+SCF+MDP, FA+MEP, and MEP showed higher values for 24h while FA+SRX was similar. SEM showed retentive surface and crystal exposure when treated with FA+SCF+MDP. The less retentive surface was obtained with MEP, and the other treatments promoted intermediate irregularities. In conclusion, surface treatment and thermocycling promoted different values of adhesive strength and contact angle in a zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramic. Failures were predominantly adhesive, and the ceramic surface was characterized by different levels of roughness and selective exposure of crystals.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
氧化锆增强二硅酸锂陶瓷的表面处理对树脂胶结物粘附性的影响。
本研究验证了氧化锆增强二硅酸锂陶瓷与树脂水泥粘结后的表面处理效果。根据处理方法(n=10)对陶瓷块进行了划分:FA+SRX(氟酸 + 硅烷 RX)、FA+MDP(氟酸 + MDP)、FA+SCF+MDP(氟酸 + 硅烷 CF + MDP)、FA+MEP(氟酸 + MEP)和 MEP(自蚀底漆)。在陶瓷块中制作树脂水泥圆柱体,用 1,200 mW/cm² 光激活 40 秒,在 37°C 的水中保存 24 小时,并通过微剪切强度测试、光学失效描述性分析(%)、表面特征(扫描电镜)和接触角(测角仪)进行评估。其他样品在 5°C 至 55°C 之间进行了 10,000 次热循环。粘接强度数据采用双向方差分析和 Tukey 检验。接触角采用单因素方差分析和 Games-Howell 检验(5%)。24 小时后,MEP 的粘结强度较高,FA+SRX 的粘结强度较低。FA+MDP 和 FA+SCF+MDP 显示出相似的值,FA+MEP 处于中间位置。热循环后,FA+SCF+MDP、FA+MEP 和 MEP 的值较高,FA+SRX 的值较低,FA+MDP 处于中间位置。如果对时间段进行比较,FA+MDP、FA+SCF+MDP、FA+MEP 和 MEP 在 24 小时内的数值较高,而 FA+SRX 的数值相近。扫描电子显微镜显示,FA+SCF+MDP 处理时,表面呈网状,晶体暴露。使用 MEP 时获得的表面保持性较差,而其他处理方法则会产生中间不规则性。总之,表面处理和热循环对氧化锆增强硅酸锂陶瓷的粘接强度和接触角有不同的促进作用。失效主要是粘附性失效,陶瓷表面具有不同程度的粗糙度和晶体的选择性暴露。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Investigation of genetic polymorphisms in interleukins associated with pain after root canal treatment. Whitening toothpastes are ineffective in recovering color from previous dental bleaching - In vitro study. Translation, adaptation, and preliminary psychometric evaluation of the PoSSe scale into brazilian portuguese. Improving fatigue behavior of CAD/CAM-ground 4YSZ via finishing, polishing, and surface treatments. In vitro performance of violet LED and argon plasma with oxygen on dentin bleaching.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1