Brucella canis: a clinical review and rationalising risk

IF 0.3 4区 农林科学 Q4 VETERINARY SCIENCES in Practice Pub Date : 2024-03-28 DOI:10.1002/inpr.416
Glynn Woods
{"title":"Brucella canis: a clinical review and rationalising risk","authors":"Glynn Woods","doi":"10.1002/inpr.416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Background</b>: After a letter published by the chief veterinary officer in February 2021 highlighted an increase in the number of positive <i>Brucella canis</i> dogs, the frequency of <i>B canis</i> testing in the UK has increased substantially. To date, roughly 160 positive cases have been reported by the APHA. Amid growing unease, veterinary teams have implemented practice protocols to mitigate risk associated with this non-endemic, zoonotic infection. Although well-meaning, blanket policy and inappropriate application of serological tests can negatively impact client and patient welfare while fuelling health anxiety among staff. The combination of increased pet travel, increased popularity of importing dogs and a lack of centralised border requirements for dogs, means <i>B canis</i> is likely to be increasingly encountered and warrants regular, evidence-based discussion to empower the profession and preserve canine welfare.</p><p><b>Aim of the article</b>: This article summarises the clinically relevant issues surrounding <i>Brucella canis</i>, focussing on epidemiology, transmission, human health and safety, clinical signs, diagnosis and treatment. Governmental recommendations and recent risk assessments by the Human Animal Infection and Risk Surveillance group are drawn on where appropriate. Moreover, the article aims to instil confidence in veterinary personnel when rationalising <i>B canis</i> infection risk, and help to ensure that canine and staff health are protected.</p>","PeriodicalId":54994,"journal":{"name":"in Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/inpr.416","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: After a letter published by the chief veterinary officer in February 2021 highlighted an increase in the number of positive Brucella canis dogs, the frequency of B canis testing in the UK has increased substantially. To date, roughly 160 positive cases have been reported by the APHA. Amid growing unease, veterinary teams have implemented practice protocols to mitigate risk associated with this non-endemic, zoonotic infection. Although well-meaning, blanket policy and inappropriate application of serological tests can negatively impact client and patient welfare while fuelling health anxiety among staff. The combination of increased pet travel, increased popularity of importing dogs and a lack of centralised border requirements for dogs, means B canis is likely to be increasingly encountered and warrants regular, evidence-based discussion to empower the profession and preserve canine welfare.

Aim of the article: This article summarises the clinically relevant issues surrounding Brucella canis, focussing on epidemiology, transmission, human health and safety, clinical signs, diagnosis and treatment. Governmental recommendations and recent risk assessments by the Human Animal Infection and Risk Surveillance group are drawn on where appropriate. Moreover, the article aims to instil confidence in veterinary personnel when rationalising B canis infection risk, and help to ensure that canine and staff health are protected.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
犬布鲁氏菌:临床回顾与风险合理化
背景:首席兽医官在 2021 年 2 月发表的一封信中强调了犬布鲁氏菌阳性犬数量的增加,此后,英国的犬布鲁氏菌检测频率大幅增加。迄今为止,APHA 已经报告了大约 160 例阳性病例。随着不安情绪的增加,兽医团队已经实施了一些操作规程,以降低与这种非地方性人畜共患病感染相关的风险。尽管出发点是好的,但一刀切的政策和血清学检测的不当应用会对客户和患者的福利产生负面影响,同时也会加剧员工的健康焦虑。宠物旅行的增加、进口犬只的日益流行以及对犬只缺乏集中的边境要求,这些因素都意味着犬结核病可能会越来越多地出现,因此有必要定期进行循证讨论,以增强专业人员的能力并维护犬只的福利:本文总结了犬布鲁氏菌的临床相关问题,重点是流行病学、传播、人类健康与安全、临床症状、诊断和治疗。文章酌情引用了政府建议和人类动物感染与风险监测小组最近的风险评估。此外,文章旨在为兽医人员在合理评估犬科细菌感染风险时注入信心,帮助确保犬只和工作人员的健康得到保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
in Practice
in Practice 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
111
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: In Practice is published 10 times a year and provides continuing educational material for veterinary practitioners. It includes clinical articles, written by experts in their field and covering all species, providing a regular update on clinical developments, and articles on veterinary practice management. All articles are peer-reviewed. First published in 1979, it now provides an extensive archive of clinical review articles. In Practice is produced in conjunction with Vet Record, the official journal of the British Veterinary Association (BVA). It is published on behalf of the BVA by BMJ Group.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Positive welfare in dairy cows: role of the vet Electrical testing of medical devices: where PAT testing is not enough Would you advise a charity to rehome or euthanase a bullycat? Comments on: Defra certification of neutering for an American XL bully: to sign or not to sign?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1