Comparison of electron temperature and density measured by helium line intensity ratio and Thomson scattering methods in ECH spherical tokamak plasma

IF 2.1 2区 物理与天体物理 Q2 PHYSICS, FLUIDS & PLASMAS Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion Pub Date : 2024-03-06 DOI:10.1088/1361-6587/ad2c2a
Takumi Komiyama, Taiichi Shikama, Kazuaki Hanada, Takeshi Ido, Takumi Onchi, Kaori Kono, Akira Ejiri, Makoto Hasegawa, Satoshi Inoue, Masahiro Hasuo, Hiroshi Idei, Qilin Yue, Kengo Kuroda, Aki Higashijima, Pakkapawn Prapan
{"title":"Comparison of electron temperature and density measured by helium line intensity ratio and Thomson scattering methods in ECH spherical tokamak plasma","authors":"Takumi Komiyama, Taiichi Shikama, Kazuaki Hanada, Takeshi Ido, Takumi Onchi, Kaori Kono, Akira Ejiri, Makoto Hasegawa, Satoshi Inoue, Masahiro Hasuo, Hiroshi Idei, Qilin Yue, Kengo Kuroda, Aki Higashijima, Pakkapawn Prapan","doi":"10.1088/1361-6587/ad2c2a","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The electron temperature and density profiles in the midplane of a spherical tokamak plasma produced by electron cyclotron heating (ECH) in Q-shu University experiment with steady-state spherical tokamak (QUEST) are measured by the helium line intensity ratio method. The measured profiles are compared with those obtained by the Thomson scattering method, and the measured temperatures and densities are found to agree within factors of ∼2 and ∼6, respectively. Taken together with the previous results of comparisons performed in the scrape-off layers of several toroidal devices, the same degree of agreement between the helium line intensity ratio method and other methods is obtained in the ranges of 7–100 eV for temperature and 4 × 10<sup>16</sup>–1 × 10<sup>19</sup> m<sup>−3</sup> for density.","PeriodicalId":20239,"journal":{"name":"Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion","volume":"159 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6587/ad2c2a","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSICS, FLUIDS & PLASMAS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The electron temperature and density profiles in the midplane of a spherical tokamak plasma produced by electron cyclotron heating (ECH) in Q-shu University experiment with steady-state spherical tokamak (QUEST) are measured by the helium line intensity ratio method. The measured profiles are compared with those obtained by the Thomson scattering method, and the measured temperatures and densities are found to agree within factors of ∼2 and ∼6, respectively. Taken together with the previous results of comparisons performed in the scrape-off layers of several toroidal devices, the same degree of agreement between the helium line intensity ratio method and other methods is obtained in the ranges of 7–100 eV for temperature and 4 × 1016–1 × 1019 m−3 for density.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用氦线强度比和汤姆逊散射法测量 ECH 球形托卡马克等离子体中电子温度和密度的比较
利用氦线强度比方法测量了Q-shu大学稳态球形托卡马克实验(QUEST)中电子回旋加热(ECH)产生的球形托卡马克等离子体中面的电子温度和密度曲线。测量结果与汤姆逊散射法得到的剖面图进行了比较,发现测量温度和密度的吻合系数分别为 ∼2和 ∼6。结合之前在几个环形装置的刮除层中进行的比较结果,在温度为 7-100 eV 和密度为 4 × 1016-1 × 1019 m-3 的范围内,氦线强度比方法与其他方法获得了相同程度的一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion
Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 物理-物理:核物理
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
13.60%
发文量
224
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion covers all aspects of the physics of hot, highly ionised plasmas. This includes results of current experimental and theoretical research on all aspects of the physics of high-temperature plasmas and of controlled nuclear fusion, including the basic phenomena in highly-ionised gases in the laboratory, in the ionosphere and in space, in magnetic-confinement and inertial-confinement fusion as well as related diagnostic methods. Papers with a technological emphasis, for example in such topics as plasma control, fusion technology and diagnostics, are welcomed when the plasma physics is an integral part of the paper or when the technology is unique to plasma applications or new to the field of plasma physics. Papers on dusty plasma physics are welcome when there is a clear relevance to fusion.
期刊最新文献
Reduced order modeling for real-time monitoring of structural displacements due to electromagnetic forces in large scale tokamaks He II line intensity measurements in the JET tokamak Sheath constraints on turbulent magnetised plasmas Vertical instability forecasting and controllability assessment of multi-device tokamak plasmas in DECAF with data-driven optimization Identifying L-H transition in HL-2A through deep learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1