Nathalie Willems, Kevin B Marchand, Christina Esposito, Daniele De Massari, Daniel Hameed, Gavin Clark, Robert Marchand, Michael A Mont, Michael Dunbar
{"title":"True Confessions of Neutral Mechanical Disciple-How I Learned to Love a Patient-Specific Target.","authors":"Nathalie Willems, Kevin B Marchand, Christina Esposito, Daniele De Massari, Daniel Hameed, Gavin Clark, Robert Marchand, Michael A Mont, Michael Dunbar","doi":"10.52198/24.STI.44.OS1758","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Classical neutral mechanical alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been a standard paradigm, while more recently, other alignment schemas, such as kinematic, individualized, and functional, have been explored. This study aimed to investigate the effect of three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT)-based surgical robotics inputs on a classically trained surgeon's TKA component positions and alignment targets over time.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Data from 1,394 consecutive robotically-assisted TKAs by a single surgeon from 2016 to 2020 were analyzed. Metrics collected included pre-balance planned implant component positions, final planned implant component positions after soft tissue balancing, and constitutional alignment from CT scans. Joint line obliquity was plotted against the arithmetic hip-knee angle (aHKA) using coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK). Three categories of alignment strategy were defined: true mechanical alignment (tMA), adjusted mechanical alignment (aMA), and no mechanical alignment (noMA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A shift to overall varus component positioning was observed over the years. Joint line obliquity according to CPAK showed a wider spread in later years, and the distribution of tibial and femoral coronal alignment angles expanded over time.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study revealed a change in alignment targets and final positioning of components away from neutral biomechanical axes in a large volume of TKAs by a single, classically trained surgeon over five years of using a robotic arm-assisted TKA system with CT-based planning. The most dominant factor for this change was the use of 3D CT planning, allowing the surgeon to assess patient-specific anatomy and plan accordingly. Outcome data is needed to determine if this change in behavior and surgical technique was beneficial. In summary, using a CT scan-based robotically assisted technique led to a gradual and complete shift from tMA to predominantly a non-mechanically aligned philosophy in TKA.</p>","PeriodicalId":22194,"journal":{"name":"Surgical technology international","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical technology international","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52198/24.STI.44.OS1758","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Classical neutral mechanical alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been a standard paradigm, while more recently, other alignment schemas, such as kinematic, individualized, and functional, have been explored. This study aimed to investigate the effect of three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT)-based surgical robotics inputs on a classically trained surgeon's TKA component positions and alignment targets over time.
Materials and methods: Data from 1,394 consecutive robotically-assisted TKAs by a single surgeon from 2016 to 2020 were analyzed. Metrics collected included pre-balance planned implant component positions, final planned implant component positions after soft tissue balancing, and constitutional alignment from CT scans. Joint line obliquity was plotted against the arithmetic hip-knee angle (aHKA) using coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK). Three categories of alignment strategy were defined: true mechanical alignment (tMA), adjusted mechanical alignment (aMA), and no mechanical alignment (noMA).
Results: A shift to overall varus component positioning was observed over the years. Joint line obliquity according to CPAK showed a wider spread in later years, and the distribution of tibial and femoral coronal alignment angles expanded over time.
Conclusion: The study revealed a change in alignment targets and final positioning of components away from neutral biomechanical axes in a large volume of TKAs by a single, classically trained surgeon over five years of using a robotic arm-assisted TKA system with CT-based planning. The most dominant factor for this change was the use of 3D CT planning, allowing the surgeon to assess patient-specific anatomy and plan accordingly. Outcome data is needed to determine if this change in behavior and surgical technique was beneficial. In summary, using a CT scan-based robotically assisted technique led to a gradual and complete shift from tMA to predominantly a non-mechanically aligned philosophy in TKA.