Botulinum toxin injection for chronic anal fissure: a prospective controlled study with long follow-up.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Minerva Surgery Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-29 DOI:10.23736/S2724-5691.24.10228-6
Simona Ascanelli, Eleonora Rossin, Filippo Aisoni, Elisabetta Sette, Laura Chimisso, Giorgia Valpiani, Anna Costanzini, Roberto DE Giorgio, Carlo V Feo
{"title":"Botulinum toxin injection for chronic anal fissure: a prospective controlled study with long follow-up.","authors":"Simona Ascanelli, Eleonora Rossin, Filippo Aisoni, Elisabetta Sette, Laura Chimisso, Giorgia Valpiani, Anna Costanzini, Roberto DE Giorgio, Carlo V Feo","doi":"10.23736/S2724-5691.24.10228-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Botulinum toxin is an effective therapeutic option for chronic anal fissure. However, there is no evidence about treatment standardization and long-term follow-up. We aimed to evaluate the short- and long-term efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin compared to close lateral internal sphincterotomy, with a 5-year follow-up.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective, controlled, single-center study conducted at University Hospital of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy. The primary outcome was fissure healing at 1 month. Secondary outcomes were Quality-of-Life (QoL) at 1 month and after 5 years, and fissure recurrence at 6 months and 5 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 59 patients received botulinum toxin injection (Botox), and 32 underwent lateral internal sphincterotomy. At 1 month after treatments, postoperative pain decreased faster and significantly more in the Botox group (30 vs. 60 mm; P<0.001); fissure re-epithelization was observed in 59.4% of the surgical group compared to 25.4% of Botox (P=0.0001). Anal sphincter pressures decreased more in surgical group (P=0.044), although severe anal incontinence was present only in this subset (6.2%; P=0.041). Compared to surgery, patients who received Botox had higher satisfaction rates (P<0.001). Fissure recurrence at 6 months was more common in Botox than surgical group (16.9% vs. 3.2%, respectively; P=0.053). The overall healing rate improved in all patients and persisted at 12 months and 5 years in both groups with overall high patient satisfaction despite mild anal incontinence in 21.8% in the surgery group (P<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Botox, rather than surgery, should be considered the first-line treatment for chronic anal fissure.</p>","PeriodicalId":29847,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-5691.24.10228-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Botulinum toxin is an effective therapeutic option for chronic anal fissure. However, there is no evidence about treatment standardization and long-term follow-up. We aimed to evaluate the short- and long-term efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin compared to close lateral internal sphincterotomy, with a 5-year follow-up.

Methods: This was a prospective, controlled, single-center study conducted at University Hospital of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy. The primary outcome was fissure healing at 1 month. Secondary outcomes were Quality-of-Life (QoL) at 1 month and after 5 years, and fissure recurrence at 6 months and 5 years.

Results: A total of 59 patients received botulinum toxin injection (Botox), and 32 underwent lateral internal sphincterotomy. At 1 month after treatments, postoperative pain decreased faster and significantly more in the Botox group (30 vs. 60 mm; P<0.001); fissure re-epithelization was observed in 59.4% of the surgical group compared to 25.4% of Botox (P=0.0001). Anal sphincter pressures decreased more in surgical group (P=0.044), although severe anal incontinence was present only in this subset (6.2%; P=0.041). Compared to surgery, patients who received Botox had higher satisfaction rates (P<0.001). Fissure recurrence at 6 months was more common in Botox than surgical group (16.9% vs. 3.2%, respectively; P=0.053). The overall healing rate improved in all patients and persisted at 12 months and 5 years in both groups with overall high patient satisfaction despite mild anal incontinence in 21.8% in the surgery group (P<0.05).

Conclusions: Botox, rather than surgery, should be considered the first-line treatment for chronic anal fissure.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肉毒杆菌毒素注射治疗慢性肛裂:一项长期随访的前瞻性对照研究。
背景:肉毒杆菌毒素是治疗慢性肛裂的有效方法。然而,目前还没有关于治疗标准化和长期随访的证据。我们旨在评估肉毒杆菌毒素与闭合侧内括约肌切开术相比的短期和长期疗效及安全性,并进行为期 5 年的随访:这是一项前瞻性、对照、单中心研究,在意大利费拉拉的费拉拉大学医院进行。主要结果为 1 个月后肛裂愈合。次要结果是1个月和5年后的生活质量(QoL),以及6个月和5年后的裂缝复发情况:共有 59 名患者接受了肉毒杆菌毒素注射,32 名患者接受了侧内括约肌切开术。在治疗后 1 个月,肉毒杆菌毒素组的术后疼痛减轻得更快、更明显(30 毫米对 60 毫米;PC 结论:肉毒杆菌毒素比手术更有效:肉毒杆菌毒素而非手术应被视为慢性肛裂的一线治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Minerva Surgery
Minerva Surgery SURGERY-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
320
期刊最新文献
Analysis of the influence of different surgical methods on the gynecological endocrine status of uterine fibroids. Analysis of the value of combined measurement of serum immunoglobulin G and subtype immunoglobulin G4 in adult autoimmune glomerulonephritis. Effect of preoperative visit combined with comfort nursing in operating room nursing and postoperative hypothermia incidence and its application. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy performed with the Endo GIA™ Stapler as an easy and safe approach. The application value of the multidisciplinary team model led by specialist nurses in pressure ulcer management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1