The effects of parental presence on amygdala and mPFC activation during fear conditioning: An exploratory study

IF 3.1 1区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Developmental Science Pub Date : 2024-03-28 DOI:10.1111/desc.13505
Lior Abramson, Bridget L. Callaghan, Jennifer A. Silvers, Tricia Choy, Michelle VanTieghem, Anna Vannucci, Andrea Fields, Nim Tottenham
{"title":"The effects of parental presence on amygdala and mPFC activation during fear conditioning: An exploratory study","authors":"Lior Abramson,&nbsp;Bridget L. Callaghan,&nbsp;Jennifer A. Silvers,&nbsp;Tricia Choy,&nbsp;Michelle VanTieghem,&nbsp;Anna Vannucci,&nbsp;Andrea Fields,&nbsp;Nim Tottenham","doi":"10.1111/desc.13505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <p>Learning safe versus dangerous cues is crucial for survival. During development, parents can influence fear learning by buffering their children's stress response and increasing exploration of potentially aversive stimuli. Rodent findings suggest that these behavioral effects are mediated through parental presence modulation of the amygdala and medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC). Here, we investigated whether similar parental modulation of amygdala and mPFC during fear learning occurs in humans. Using a within-subjects design, behavioral (final <i>N</i> = 48, 6–17 years, mean = 11.61, SD = 2.84, 60% females/40% males) and neuroimaging data (final <i>N</i> = 39, 6–17 years, mean = 12.03, SD = 2.98, 59% females/41% males) were acquired during a classical fear conditioning task, which included a CS+ followed by an aversive noise (US; 75% reinforcement rate) and a CS−. Conditioning occurred once in physical contact with the participant's parent and once alone (order counterbalanced). Region of interest analyses examined the unconditioned stress response by BOLD activation to the US (vs. implicit baseline) and learning by activation to the CS+ (vs. CS−). Results showed that during US presentation, parental presence reduced the centromedial amygdala activity, suggesting buffering of the unconditioned stress response. In response to learned stimuli, parental presence reduced mPFC activity to the CS+ (relative to the CS−), although this result did not survive multiple comparisons’ correction. These preliminary findings indicate that parents modulate amygdala and mPFC activity during exposure to unconditioned and conditioned fear stimuli, potentially providing insight into the neural mechanisms by which parents act as a social buffer during fear learning.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Research Highlights</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>This study used a within-participant experimental design to investigate how parental presence (vs. absence) affects youth's neural responses in a classical fear conditioning task.</li>\n \n <li>Parental presence reduced the youth's centromedial amygdala activation to the unconditioned stimulus (US), suggesting parental buffering of the neural unconditioned response (UR).</li>\n \n <li>Parental presence reduced the youth's mPFC activation to a conditioned threat cue (CS+) compared to a safety cue (CS−), suggesting possible parental modulation of fear learning.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48392,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Science","volume":"27 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental Science","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/desc.13505","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Learning safe versus dangerous cues is crucial for survival. During development, parents can influence fear learning by buffering their children's stress response and increasing exploration of potentially aversive stimuli. Rodent findings suggest that these behavioral effects are mediated through parental presence modulation of the amygdala and medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC). Here, we investigated whether similar parental modulation of amygdala and mPFC during fear learning occurs in humans. Using a within-subjects design, behavioral (final N = 48, 6–17 years, mean = 11.61, SD = 2.84, 60% females/40% males) and neuroimaging data (final N = 39, 6–17 years, mean = 12.03, SD = 2.98, 59% females/41% males) were acquired during a classical fear conditioning task, which included a CS+ followed by an aversive noise (US; 75% reinforcement rate) and a CS−. Conditioning occurred once in physical contact with the participant's parent and once alone (order counterbalanced). Region of interest analyses examined the unconditioned stress response by BOLD activation to the US (vs. implicit baseline) and learning by activation to the CS+ (vs. CS−). Results showed that during US presentation, parental presence reduced the centromedial amygdala activity, suggesting buffering of the unconditioned stress response. In response to learned stimuli, parental presence reduced mPFC activity to the CS+ (relative to the CS−), although this result did not survive multiple comparisons’ correction. These preliminary findings indicate that parents modulate amygdala and mPFC activity during exposure to unconditioned and conditioned fear stimuli, potentially providing insight into the neural mechanisms by which parents act as a social buffer during fear learning.

Research Highlights

  • This study used a within-participant experimental design to investigate how parental presence (vs. absence) affects youth's neural responses in a classical fear conditioning task.
  • Parental presence reduced the youth's centromedial amygdala activation to the unconditioned stimulus (US), suggesting parental buffering of the neural unconditioned response (UR).
  • Parental presence reduced the youth's mPFC activation to a conditioned threat cue (CS+) compared to a safety cue (CS−), suggesting possible parental modulation of fear learning.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
父母的存在对恐惧条件反射过程中杏仁核和前脑皮质激活的影响:一项探索性研究
学习安全与危险的暗示对生存至关重要。在孩子的成长过程中,父母可以通过缓冲孩子的应激反应和增加对潜在厌恶刺激的探索来影响孩子的恐惧学习。啮齿类动物的研究结果表明,这些行为效应是通过父母对杏仁核和内侧前额叶皮层(mPFC)的存在调节介导的。在此,我们研究了人类在恐惧学习过程中是否也会受到父母对杏仁核和内侧前额叶皮层的类似调节。我们采用受试者内设计,在经典恐惧条件反射任务中获得了行为数据(最终受试者 48 人,6-17 岁,平均值 = 11.61,SD = 2.84,60% 为女性/40% 为男性)和神经影像学数据(最终受试者 39 人,6-17 岁,平均值 = 12.03,SD = 2.98,59% 为女性/41% 为男性)。条件反射与受试者父母的身体接触进行一次,单独进行一次(顺序平衡)。兴趣区分析通过对 US 的 BOLD 激活(与内隐基线对比)和对 CS+ 的激活(与 CS-对比)检查了无条件应激反应。结果表明,在出现 US 时,父母的存在降低了杏仁核中央区的活动,这表明非条件应激反应得到了缓冲。在对已学得的刺激做出反应时,父母的存在降低了mPFC对CS+(相对于CS-)的活动,尽管这一结果未能通过多重比较校正。这些初步研究结果表明,在暴露于无条件和有条件的恐惧刺激时,父母会调节杏仁核和mPFC的活动,从而有可能让人们了解父母在恐惧学习过程中充当社会缓冲器的神经机制。研究要点:(1)本研究采用参与者内实验设计,研究父母在场(与不在场)如何影响青少年在经典恐惧条件反射任务中的神经反应。(2)父母的存在降低了青少年杏仁核中央区对无条件刺激(US)的激活,表明父母对无条件反应(UR)的神经缓冲作用。(3)与安全提示(CS-)相比,父母的存在降低了青少年对条件性威胁提示(CS+)的mPFC激活,这表明父母可能会调节恐惧学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
8.10%
发文量
132
期刊介绍: Developmental Science publishes cutting-edge theory and up-to-the-minute research on scientific developmental psychology from leading thinkers in the field. It is currently the only journal that specifically focuses on human developmental cognitive neuroscience. Coverage includes: - Clinical, computational and comparative approaches to development - Key advances in cognitive and social development - Developmental cognitive neuroscience - Functional neuroimaging of the developing brain
期刊最新文献
Accelerated Infant Brain Rhythm Maturation in Autism Happy Normativists: Do Children Express Happiness When Following Conventional Norms? Who Peeked? Children Infer the Likely Cause of Improbable Success On the Broader Significance of Maternal Sensitivity: Mothers’ Early and Later Sensitive Parenting Matter to Children's Language, Executive Function, Academics, and Self-Reliance Self-Regulation in Preschool: Are Executive Function and Effortful Control Overlapping Constructs?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1