Noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis and portal hypertension.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Current Opinion in Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-28 DOI:10.1097/MOG.0000000000001019
Andres Duarte-Rojo, Keyur Patel, Don C Rockey
{"title":"Noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis and portal hypertension.","authors":"Andres Duarte-Rojo, Keyur Patel, Don C Rockey","doi":"10.1097/MOG.0000000000001019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The result of ongoing liver injury - and disease, regardless of cause - is fibrosis, and fibrosis appears to be a critically important result of ongoing injury. Further, in a number of different liver diseases, the presence of fibrosis has prognostic value. Therefore, the assessment of fibrosis is of critical clinical importance. Given the importance of fibrosis, there has been a rapid evolution in the use of noninvasive liver tests. This review highlights a number of the core principles surrounding.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>The use of noninvasive test has progressed rapidly over the last decade and data are rapidly accumulating. New terminology has been adapted by the American Association for the Study of Liver Disease (AASLD) for noninvasive assessment of liver disease and termed 'NILDA' (Non-Invasive Liver Disease Assessment). Blood based such as APRI and or FIB-4 and imaging tests such as liver stiffness measurement (LSM) have moderate to high degrees of accuracy for detection of advanced liver fibrosis (≥ F2) and even higher accuracy for detection of severe fibrosis (F4 or cirrhosis). NILDA are particularly effective at the ends of the liver disease spectrum. For example, a very low LSM (less than 7 kPa) essentially excludes significant fibrosis or portal hypertension, and a very high LSM (> 25 kPa) makes significant fibrosis with portal hypertension (cirrhosis) highly likely.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>NILDA are currently front and center in terms of assessment of the severity of liver disease. In all patients with known or suspected liver disease, noninvasive blood tests, including APRI and or FIB-4, should be the initial choice to assess the severity of liver fibrosis and/or portal hypertension. In most patients, these tests should be followed with imaging evaluation. The most commonly available imaging is LSM, which appears to be more accurate in predicting fibrosis severity, and is superior to blood tests in the assessment of portal hypertension. In situations in which there is diagnostic uncertainly, liver biopsy with or without HVPG remains an important consideration.</p>","PeriodicalId":50607,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":"148-155"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MOG.0000000000001019","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: The result of ongoing liver injury - and disease, regardless of cause - is fibrosis, and fibrosis appears to be a critically important result of ongoing injury. Further, in a number of different liver diseases, the presence of fibrosis has prognostic value. Therefore, the assessment of fibrosis is of critical clinical importance. Given the importance of fibrosis, there has been a rapid evolution in the use of noninvasive liver tests. This review highlights a number of the core principles surrounding.

Recent findings: The use of noninvasive test has progressed rapidly over the last decade and data are rapidly accumulating. New terminology has been adapted by the American Association for the Study of Liver Disease (AASLD) for noninvasive assessment of liver disease and termed 'NILDA' (Non-Invasive Liver Disease Assessment). Blood based such as APRI and or FIB-4 and imaging tests such as liver stiffness measurement (LSM) have moderate to high degrees of accuracy for detection of advanced liver fibrosis (≥ F2) and even higher accuracy for detection of severe fibrosis (F4 or cirrhosis). NILDA are particularly effective at the ends of the liver disease spectrum. For example, a very low LSM (less than 7 kPa) essentially excludes significant fibrosis or portal hypertension, and a very high LSM (> 25 kPa) makes significant fibrosis with portal hypertension (cirrhosis) highly likely.

Summary: NILDA are currently front and center in terms of assessment of the severity of liver disease. In all patients with known or suspected liver disease, noninvasive blood tests, including APRI and or FIB-4, should be the initial choice to assess the severity of liver fibrosis and/or portal hypertension. In most patients, these tests should be followed with imaging evaluation. The most commonly available imaging is LSM, which appears to be more accurate in predicting fibrosis severity, and is superior to blood tests in the assessment of portal hypertension. In situations in which there is diagnostic uncertainly, liver biopsy with or without HVPG remains an important consideration.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肝纤维化和门静脉高压的无创评估。
综述的目的:肝脏持续损伤和疾病(无论病因如何)的结果是纤维化,而纤维化似乎是持续损伤的一个极其重要的结果。此外,在许多不同的肝病中,纤维化的存在具有预后价值。因此,纤维化的评估在临床上至关重要。鉴于肝纤维化的重要性,无创肝脏检测的应用也在迅速发展。这篇综述强调了围绕无创肝脏检测的一些核心原则:无创检测的使用在过去十年中进展迅速,数据也在迅速积累。美国肝病研究协会(AASLD)对无创肝病评估采用了新的术语,称为 "NILDA"(无创肝病评估)。基于血液(如 APRI 和 FIB-4)和影像学(如肝脏硬度测量)的检测方法(如 LSM)对晚期肝纤维化(≥ F2)的检测具有中度到高度的准确性,对严重肝纤维化(F4 或肝硬化)的检测具有更高的准确性。NILDA 在肝脏疾病谱的两端尤其有效。例如,极低的 LSM(小于 7 kPa)基本上排除了明显纤维化或门脉高压,而极高的 LSM(> 25 kPa)则极有可能是明显纤维化伴门脉高压(肝硬化)。对于所有已知或疑似肝病患者,包括 APRI 和或 FIB-4 在内的无创血液检查应作为评估肝纤维化和/或门脉高压严重程度的首选。对大多数患者来说,在进行这些检测后还应进行影像学评估。最常见的影像学检查是 LSM,它似乎能更准确地预测肝纤维化的严重程度,在评估门静脉高压方面优于血液检查。在诊断不确定的情况下,进行或不进行 HVPG 的肝活检仍是一个重要的考虑因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Gastroenterology
Current Opinion in Gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
137
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​Published bimonthly and offering a unique and wide ranging perspective on the key developments in the field, each issue of Current Opinion in Gastroenterology features hand-picked review articles from our team of expert editors. With twelve disciplines published across the year – including gastrointestinal infections, nutrition and inflammatory bowel disease – every issue also contains annotated references detailing the merits of the most important papers.
期刊最新文献
Updates on therapeutic endoscopic ultrasound. Tight junction regulation, intestinal permeability, and mucosal immunity in gastrointestinal health and disease. Endoscopic therapies for bariatric surgery complications. Gastroduodenal injury and repair mechanisms. Nutritional aspects in patients with gastroparesis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1