Development and Validation of a Cell-Based Binding Neutralizing Antibody Assay for an Antibody-Drug Conjugate.

IF 5 3区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY AAPS Journal Pub Date : 2024-03-28 DOI:10.1208/s12248-024-00909-7
Weifeng Xu, Nazneen Bano, Olguitza Guzman-Valdes, Jessica Amberman, Elisha Bandlamudi, Pooja Khanna, Rebecca Carmean, Roy Helmy
{"title":"Development and Validation of a Cell-Based Binding Neutralizing Antibody Assay for an Antibody-Drug Conjugate.","authors":"Weifeng Xu, Nazneen Bano, Olguitza Guzman-Valdes, Jessica Amberman, Elisha Bandlamudi, Pooja Khanna, Rebecca Carmean, Roy Helmy","doi":"10.1208/s12248-024-00909-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The utilization of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) has gained considerable attention in the field of targeted cancer therapy due to their ability to synergistically combine the specificity of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and the potency of small molecular drugs. However, the immunogenic nature of the antibody component within ADCs warrants the need for robust immunogenicity testing, including a neutralizing antibody (NAb) assay. Since the mechanism of action (MOA) of the ADC is to first bind to the target cells and then release the payload intracellularly to kill the cells, the most relevant NAb assay format would be a cell-based killing assay. However, in this paper, we present a case where a cell-based killing assay could not be developed after multiple cell lines and NAb-positive controls (PC) had been tested. Surprisingly, contrary to our expectations, all NAb PCs tested exhibited an increased killing effect on the target cells, instead of the expected protective response. This unexpected phenomenon most likely is due to the non-specific internalization of drug/NAb complexes via FcγRs, as an excessive amount of human IgG1 and mouse IgG2a, but not mouse IgG1, greatly inhibited drug or drug/NAb complexes induced cell death. To overcome this obstacle, we implemented a novel cell-based binding assay utilizing the Meso Scale Discovery (MSD) platform. We also propose that an in vitro cell killing NAb assay is limited to at best monitoring the target binding and internalization induced cell death, but not by-stander killing induced by prematurely released or dead-cell released payload, hence cannot really mimic the in vivo MOA of ADC.</p>","PeriodicalId":50934,"journal":{"name":"AAPS Journal","volume":"26 3","pages":"37"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AAPS Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1208/s12248-024-00909-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The utilization of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) has gained considerable attention in the field of targeted cancer therapy due to their ability to synergistically combine the specificity of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and the potency of small molecular drugs. However, the immunogenic nature of the antibody component within ADCs warrants the need for robust immunogenicity testing, including a neutralizing antibody (NAb) assay. Since the mechanism of action (MOA) of the ADC is to first bind to the target cells and then release the payload intracellularly to kill the cells, the most relevant NAb assay format would be a cell-based killing assay. However, in this paper, we present a case where a cell-based killing assay could not be developed after multiple cell lines and NAb-positive controls (PC) had been tested. Surprisingly, contrary to our expectations, all NAb PCs tested exhibited an increased killing effect on the target cells, instead of the expected protective response. This unexpected phenomenon most likely is due to the non-specific internalization of drug/NAb complexes via FcγRs, as an excessive amount of human IgG1 and mouse IgG2a, but not mouse IgG1, greatly inhibited drug or drug/NAb complexes induced cell death. To overcome this obstacle, we implemented a novel cell-based binding assay utilizing the Meso Scale Discovery (MSD) platform. We also propose that an in vitro cell killing NAb assay is limited to at best monitoring the target binding and internalization induced cell death, but not by-stander killing induced by prematurely released or dead-cell released payload, hence cannot really mimic the in vivo MOA of ADC.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开发并验证基于细胞的抗体药物共轭物结合中和抗体检测方法
抗体药物共轭物(ADCs)能够协同结合单克隆抗体(mAbs)的特异性和小分子药物的效力,因此在癌症靶向治疗领域备受关注。然而,ADCs 中抗体成分的免疫原性要求进行严格的免疫原性测试,包括中和抗体 (NAb) 检测。由于 ADC 的作用机制(MOA)是首先与靶细胞结合,然后在细胞内释放有效载荷以杀死细胞,因此最相关的 NAb 检测形式是基于细胞的杀伤性检测。然而,在本文中,我们介绍了一种情况,即在对多个细胞系和 NAb 阳性对照组 (PC) 进行测试后,仍无法开发出基于细胞的杀伤检测方法。令人惊讶的是,与我们的预期相反,所有测试过的 NAb PC 对靶细胞的杀伤效果都有所增强,而不是预期的保护性反应。这种意想不到的现象很可能是由于药物/NAb 复合物通过 FcγRs 的非特异性内化所致,因为过量的人 IgG1 和小鼠 IgG2a(而非小鼠 IgG1)能极大地抑制药物或药物/NAb 复合物诱导的细胞死亡。为了克服这一障碍,我们利用中观尺度发现(MSD)平台实施了一种新型的基于细胞的结合测定。我们还提出,体外细胞杀伤 NAb 试验最多只能监测目标结合和内化诱导的细胞死亡,而不能监测过早释放或死细胞释放的有效载荷诱导的旁观者杀伤,因此不能真正模拟 ADC 的体内 MOA。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
AAPS Journal
AAPS Journal 医学-药学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.40%
发文量
109
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The AAPS Journal, an official journal of the American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists (AAPS), publishes novel and significant findings in the various areas of pharmaceutical sciences impacting human and veterinary therapeutics, including: · Drug Design and Discovery · Pharmaceutical Biotechnology · Biopharmaceutics, Formulation, and Drug Delivery · Metabolism and Transport · Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Pharmacometrics · Translational Research · Clinical Evaluations and Therapeutic Outcomes · Regulatory Science We invite submissions under the following article types: · Original Research Articles · Reviews and Mini-reviews · White Papers, Commentaries, and Editorials · Meeting Reports · Brief/Technical Reports and Rapid Communications · Regulatory Notes · Tutorials · Protocols in the Pharmaceutical Sciences In addition, The AAPS Journal publishes themes, organized by guest editors, which are focused on particular areas of current interest to our field.
期刊最新文献
Recommendation for Clarifying FDA Policy in Evaluating "Sameness" of Higher Order Structure for Generic Peptide Therapeutics. Tumor-Infiltration Mimicking Model of Contaminated Ovarian Tissue as an Innovative Platform for Advanced Cancer Research. Development of Solidified Self-microemulsifying Delivery Systems Containing Tacrolimus for Enhanced Dissolution and Pharmacokinetic Profile. Exploring the Correlation between LC-MS Multi-Attribute Method and Conventional Chromatographic Product Quality Assays through Multivariate Data Analysis. A Data Driven Strategy for Implementation of Singlicate Analysis in Ligand Binding Assays Used for the Determination of Anti-drug Antibodies to a Multidomain Biotherapeutic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1