Monitoring coeliac disease in 2024, time to change practice?

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Current Opinion in Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-13 DOI:10.1097/MOG.0000000000001009
Suneil A Raju, Mohamed G Shiha, Hugo A Penny
{"title":"Monitoring coeliac disease in 2024, time to change practice?","authors":"Suneil A Raju, Mohamed G Shiha, Hugo A Penny","doi":"10.1097/MOG.0000000000001009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Persistent villous atrophy is associated with morbidity in coeliac disease and most commonly due to ongoing gluten ingestion. Current methods for assessing gluten exposure and persisting villous atrophy include dietary questionnaires and repeat duodenal biopsy, which have limited accuracy or are invasive. This review discusses adjunctive and/or novel tests that could be used to overcome these challenges.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Small bowel capsule endoscopy is well tolerated and helps to evaluate for persisting villous atrophy and importantly, complications associated with coeliac disease. Testing for urinary and/or stool gluten immunogenic peptides may help identify recent gluten exposure, but further studies are still warranted to evaluate the accuracy and applicability of this approach. Measuring spikes in circulating Interleukin-2 following gluten challenge has shown promise for coeliac disease diagnosis, and thus may serve as a useful confirmatory test in those with persisting symptoms but provides no information on mucosal inflammation. No specific gut microbial signature has been identified in coeliac disease; however, studies have shown a reduced microbial diversity in active disease, which with future refinement may prove clinically useful.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>There is no evidence to support alternative methods for assessing persisting villous atrophy in coeliac disease over performing an up-to-date duodenal biopsy. Monitoring for adherence to a gluten-free diet remains clinically challenging and should be a priority for future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":50607,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":"190-195"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MOG.0000000000001009","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: Persistent villous atrophy is associated with morbidity in coeliac disease and most commonly due to ongoing gluten ingestion. Current methods for assessing gluten exposure and persisting villous atrophy include dietary questionnaires and repeat duodenal biopsy, which have limited accuracy or are invasive. This review discusses adjunctive and/or novel tests that could be used to overcome these challenges.

Recent findings: Small bowel capsule endoscopy is well tolerated and helps to evaluate for persisting villous atrophy and importantly, complications associated with coeliac disease. Testing for urinary and/or stool gluten immunogenic peptides may help identify recent gluten exposure, but further studies are still warranted to evaluate the accuracy and applicability of this approach. Measuring spikes in circulating Interleukin-2 following gluten challenge has shown promise for coeliac disease diagnosis, and thus may serve as a useful confirmatory test in those with persisting symptoms but provides no information on mucosal inflammation. No specific gut microbial signature has been identified in coeliac disease; however, studies have shown a reduced microbial diversity in active disease, which with future refinement may prove clinically useful.

Summary: There is no evidence to support alternative methods for assessing persisting villous atrophy in coeliac disease over performing an up-to-date duodenal biopsy. Monitoring for adherence to a gluten-free diet remains clinically challenging and should be a priority for future research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2024 年监测乳糜泻,是时候改变做法了吗?
回顾的目的:持续性绒毛萎缩与乳糜泻的发病率有关,最常见的原因是持续摄入麸质。目前评估麸质暴露和持续性绒毛萎缩的方法包括饮食问卷调查和重复十二指肠活检,但这些方法的准确性有限或具有创伤性。本综述讨论了可用于克服这些挑战的辅助和/或新型检测方法:最近的研究结果:小肠胶囊内镜检查的耐受性良好,有助于评估持续性绒毛萎缩,更重要的是有助于评估与腹腔疾病相关的并发症。检测尿液和/或粪便中的麸质免疫原肽可能有助于确定近期是否接触过麸质,但仍需进一步研究以评估这种方法的准确性和适用性。在麸质挑战后测量循环白细胞介素-2的峰值已显示出诊断乳糜泻的前景,因此可作为症状持续存在者的有用确证试验,但不能提供有关粘膜炎症的信息。小结:目前还没有证据支持在进行最新的十二指肠活检的基础上,采用其他方法来评估乳糜泻的持续性绒毛萎缩。监测是否坚持无麸质饮食在临床上仍具有挑战性,应成为未来研究的重点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Gastroenterology
Current Opinion in Gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
137
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​Published bimonthly and offering a unique and wide ranging perspective on the key developments in the field, each issue of Current Opinion in Gastroenterology features hand-picked review articles from our team of expert editors. With twelve disciplines published across the year – including gastrointestinal infections, nutrition and inflammatory bowel disease – every issue also contains annotated references detailing the merits of the most important papers.
期刊最新文献
Updates on therapeutic endoscopic ultrasound. Tight junction regulation, intestinal permeability, and mucosal immunity in gastrointestinal health and disease. Endoscopic therapies for bariatric surgery complications. Gastroduodenal injury and repair mechanisms. Nutritional aspects in patients with gastroparesis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1