Transitioning to Outpatient Shoulder Arthroplasty: Safety, Efficiency, and Cost in a Diverse Payer Mix.

Daniel E Goltz, Jay M Levin, John R Wickman, Jeffrey A O'Donnell, Barrie S Sugarman, Colleen M Wixted, Jocelyn R Wittstein, Tally E Lassiter
{"title":"Transitioning to Outpatient Shoulder Arthroplasty: Safety, Efficiency, and Cost in a Diverse Payer Mix.","authors":"Daniel E Goltz, Jay M Levin, John R Wickman, Jeffrey A O'Donnell, Barrie S Sugarman, Colleen M Wixted, Jocelyn R Wittstein, Tally E Lassiter","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Outpatient shoulder arthroplasty presents potential clinical benefits but also risk without perioperative optimization. Length of stay depends largely on surgeon preferences, and a large single-surgeon cohort may provide insight into optimal strategies and costs for outpatient shoulder arthroplasty. A single-surgeon cohort of 472 anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasties performed between 2017 and 2020 was retrospectively reviewed. Cases were stratified by those who did or did not undergo same-day discharge. The 90-day readmission, discharge to post-acute care, cost, and 45 patient/case factors were examined. Two hundred fifty (53%) underwent same-day discharge, with the proportion of outpatient cases increasing over time to nearly 80%, with no significant difference in 90-day readmissions. Revision cases often underwent same-day discharge, whereas fractures were typically admitted. The cost was significantly higher for inpatients, with implants accounting for 52%. Surgeons may safely transition a substantial proportion of shoulder arthroplasties to same-day discharge with some reassurance regarding cost savings and 90-day readmissions. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 32(4):263-269, 2023).</p>","PeriodicalId":516534,"journal":{"name":"Journal of surgical orthopaedic advances","volume":"32 4","pages":"263-269"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of surgical orthopaedic advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Outpatient shoulder arthroplasty presents potential clinical benefits but also risk without perioperative optimization. Length of stay depends largely on surgeon preferences, and a large single-surgeon cohort may provide insight into optimal strategies and costs for outpatient shoulder arthroplasty. A single-surgeon cohort of 472 anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasties performed between 2017 and 2020 was retrospectively reviewed. Cases were stratified by those who did or did not undergo same-day discharge. The 90-day readmission, discharge to post-acute care, cost, and 45 patient/case factors were examined. Two hundred fifty (53%) underwent same-day discharge, with the proportion of outpatient cases increasing over time to nearly 80%, with no significant difference in 90-day readmissions. Revision cases often underwent same-day discharge, whereas fractures were typically admitted. The cost was significantly higher for inpatients, with implants accounting for 52%. Surgeons may safely transition a substantial proportion of shoulder arthroplasties to same-day discharge with some reassurance regarding cost savings and 90-day readmissions. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 32(4):263-269, 2023).

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
向门诊肩关节置换术过渡:不同付款人组合中的安全、效率和成本。
门诊肩关节置换术具有潜在的临床优势,但如果不对围术期进行优化,也会存在风险。住院时间的长短在很大程度上取决于外科医生的偏好,而一个大型的单一外科医生队列可能会让人了解门诊肩关节置换术的最佳策略和成本。我们对 2017 年至 2020 年间进行的 472 例解剖和反向肩关节置换术的单一外科医生队列进行了回顾性研究。按照当天出院与否对病例进行了分层。对90天再入院、出院后护理、费用和45个患者/病例因素进行了研究。250例(53%)患者接受了当天出院,门诊病例的比例随着时间的推移增加到近80%,但90天再入院率没有显著差异。翻修病例通常当天出院,而骨折病例通常住院治疗。住院病人的费用明显更高,其中植入物占 52%。外科医生可以放心地将很大一部分肩关节置换手术转为当天出院,并在一定程度上降低成本和90天再入院率。(手术矫形进展杂志》32(4):263-269,2023 年)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sleep Disturbance in Orthopaedic Surgery: A Review of the Literature. Prospective, Randomized, Intra-subject Controlled Trial Comparing Ultrasound-guided Thread and Mini-open Carpal Tunnel Release. Traction Internal Rotation Radiographs Aid in the Assessment of Lateral Femoral Wall Integrity in Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures. Limiting Narcotic Utilization Following Ankle Fracture Surgery. Significantly Lower Incidence of Patellar Clunk Syndrome Using a Highly Congruent Tibial Insert.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1