Posterior cranial fossa meningiomas: Comparison of results between patients older and younger than 70 years

IF 1.9 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Brain & spine Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.bas.2024.102790
Luciano Mastronardi, Alberto Campione, Amer Ahmad Alomari
{"title":"Posterior cranial fossa meningiomas: Comparison of results between patients older and younger than 70 years","authors":"Luciano Mastronardi,&nbsp;Alberto Campione,&nbsp;Amer Ahmad Alomari","doi":"10.1016/j.bas.2024.102790","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Surgical strategy for meningioma resection in the elderly is controversial: diverse studies in the literature have pointed at the age as a negative prognostic factor in terms of postoperative results.</p></div><div><h3>Research question</h3><p>The aim of this study is to compare surgical outcomes after resection of posterior fossa meningiomas in &lt;70 and ≥ 70 years-old age groups.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>We reviewed 72 patients affected by posterior fossa meningiomas who underwent surgical treatment at San Filippo Neri Hospital, Rome, Italy between September 2010 and December 2022. We analyzed data regarding tumor size, clinical presentation, extent of resection and complication/mortality.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The groups consisted of 52 (72,2%) young and 20 (27,8%) elderly patients. Gross total resection rate was significantly higher among youngsters (<em>p = 0,013</em>), mainly for planned subtotal removal in older patients. At 3-month follow-up, clinical improvement was seen in 19 (36,5%) young and 7 (35,0%) elderly patients, which raised at last follow-up, being 84,6% (44) and 80,0% (16), respectively (<em>p = 0,406</em>). Two cases of progression/recurrence among the elderly and 1 among youngsters were observed; one case of mortality among the elderly was reported.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion and conclusions</h3><p>Safety data regarding postoperative complications and mortality in our series seem to confirm that there is no significant difference between older and younger patients, as long as older patients are carefully selected. Therefore, if surgery is proposed, it should be radical if gross total resection could be safely attempted.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72443,"journal":{"name":"Brain & spine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772529424000468/pdfft?md5=da5f8f05cb5b6c53a9edf569fdc60158&pid=1-s2.0-S2772529424000468-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain & spine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772529424000468","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Surgical strategy for meningioma resection in the elderly is controversial: diverse studies in the literature have pointed at the age as a negative prognostic factor in terms of postoperative results.

Research question

The aim of this study is to compare surgical outcomes after resection of posterior fossa meningiomas in <70 and ≥ 70 years-old age groups.

Material and methods

We reviewed 72 patients affected by posterior fossa meningiomas who underwent surgical treatment at San Filippo Neri Hospital, Rome, Italy between September 2010 and December 2022. We analyzed data regarding tumor size, clinical presentation, extent of resection and complication/mortality.

Results

The groups consisted of 52 (72,2%) young and 20 (27,8%) elderly patients. Gross total resection rate was significantly higher among youngsters (p = 0,013), mainly for planned subtotal removal in older patients. At 3-month follow-up, clinical improvement was seen in 19 (36,5%) young and 7 (35,0%) elderly patients, which raised at last follow-up, being 84,6% (44) and 80,0% (16), respectively (p = 0,406). Two cases of progression/recurrence among the elderly and 1 among youngsters were observed; one case of mortality among the elderly was reported.

Discussion and conclusions

Safety data regarding postoperative complications and mortality in our series seem to confirm that there is no significant difference between older and younger patients, as long as older patients are carefully selected. Therefore, if surgery is proposed, it should be radical if gross total resection could be safely attempted.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
后颅窝脑膜瘤:70 岁以上和 70 岁以下患者的结果比较
导言老年人脑膜瘤切除术的手术策略存在争议:不同的文献研究均指出年龄是影响术后效果的不利预后因素。研究问题本研究旨在比较 70 岁和≥ 70 岁年龄组后窝脑膜瘤切除术的手术效果。我们分析了有关肿瘤大小、临床表现、切除范围和并发症/死亡的数据。年轻患者的总切除率明显更高(P = 0.013),主要是老年患者计划的次全切除。在 3 个月的随访中,19 名年轻患者(36.5%)和 7 名老年患者(35.0%)的临床症状有所改善,在最后一次随访中,临床症状有所改善,分别为 84.6%(44 例)和 80.0%(16 例)(p = 0.406)。讨论和结论我们的系列研究中有关术后并发症和死亡率的安全数据似乎证实,只要仔细挑选老年患者,老年患者和年轻患者之间并无明显差异。因此,如果建议进行手术,在可以安全地尝试全切除的情况下,应采取根治性手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Brain & spine
Brain & spine Surgery
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
71 days
期刊最新文献
Retraction notice to "Decency in neurosurgery" [Brain Spine 4 (2024), 102744]. Impact of implant removal on quality of life and loss of correction in the treatment of traumatic fractures of the thoracolumbar spine. Under pressure - A historical vignette on surgical timing in traumatic spinal cord injury. Under pressure - A historical vignette on surgical timing in traumatic spinal cord injury Comparing image normalization techniques in an end-to-end model for automated modic changes classification from MRI images
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1