Assessing the impact of distortion correction on Gamma Knife radiosurgery for multiple metastasis: Volumetric and dosimetric analysis

IF 1.9 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Brain & spine Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.bas.2024.102791
Yavuz Samanci , M. Orbay Askeroglu , Ali Haluk Düzkalir , Selcuk Peker
{"title":"Assessing the impact of distortion correction on Gamma Knife radiosurgery for multiple metastasis: Volumetric and dosimetric analysis","authors":"Yavuz Samanci ,&nbsp;M. Orbay Askeroglu ,&nbsp;Ali Haluk Düzkalir ,&nbsp;Selcuk Peker","doi":"10.1016/j.bas.2024.102791","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a robust neuroimaging technique and is the preferred method for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) planning. However, MRI data always contain distortions caused by hardware and patient factors.</p></div><div><h3>Research question</h3><p>Can these distortions potentially compromise the effectiveness and safety of SRS treatments?</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>Twenty-six MR datasets with multiple metastatic brain tumors (METs) used for Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) were retrospectively evaluated. A commercially available software was used for distortion correction. Geometrical agreement between corrected and uncorrected tumor volumes was evaluated using MacDonald criteria, Euclidian distance, and Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). SRS plans were generated using uncorrected tumor volumes, which were assessed to determine their coverage of the corrected tumor volumes.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The median target volume was 0.38 cm<sup>3</sup> (range,0.01–12.38 cm3). A maximum displacement of METs of up to 2.87 mm and a median displacement of 0.55 mm (range,0.1–2.87 mm) were noted. The median DSC between uncorrected and corrected MRI was 0.92, and the most concerning case had a DSC of 0.46. Although all plans met the optimization criterion of at least 98% of the uncorrected tumor volume (median 99.55%, range 98.1–100%) receiving at least 100% of the prescription dose, the percent of the corrected tumor volume receiving the total prescription dose was a median of 95.45% (range,23.1–99.5%).</p></div><div><h3>Discussion and conclusion</h3><p>MRI distortion, though visually subtle, has significant implications for SRS planning. Regular utilization of corrected MRI is recommended for SRS planning as distortion is sometimes enough to cause a volumetric miss of SRS targets.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72443,"journal":{"name":"Brain & spine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277252942400047X/pdfft?md5=9104082efb61030e51f25abc4b52ac32&pid=1-s2.0-S277252942400047X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain & spine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277252942400047X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a robust neuroimaging technique and is the preferred method for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) planning. However, MRI data always contain distortions caused by hardware and patient factors.

Research question

Can these distortions potentially compromise the effectiveness and safety of SRS treatments?

Material and methods

Twenty-six MR datasets with multiple metastatic brain tumors (METs) used for Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) were retrospectively evaluated. A commercially available software was used for distortion correction. Geometrical agreement between corrected and uncorrected tumor volumes was evaluated using MacDonald criteria, Euclidian distance, and Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). SRS plans were generated using uncorrected tumor volumes, which were assessed to determine their coverage of the corrected tumor volumes.

Results

The median target volume was 0.38 cm3 (range,0.01–12.38 cm3). A maximum displacement of METs of up to 2.87 mm and a median displacement of 0.55 mm (range,0.1–2.87 mm) were noted. The median DSC between uncorrected and corrected MRI was 0.92, and the most concerning case had a DSC of 0.46. Although all plans met the optimization criterion of at least 98% of the uncorrected tumor volume (median 99.55%, range 98.1–100%) receiving at least 100% of the prescription dose, the percent of the corrected tumor volume receiving the total prescription dose was a median of 95.45% (range,23.1–99.5%).

Discussion and conclusion

MRI distortion, though visually subtle, has significant implications for SRS planning. Regular utilization of corrected MRI is recommended for SRS planning as distortion is sometimes enough to cause a volumetric miss of SRS targets.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估变形校正对伽玛刀放射外科治疗多发性转移瘤的影响:体积和剂量分析
引言磁共振成像(MRI)是一种强大的神经成像技术,也是立体定向放射外科(SRS)规划的首选方法。材料与方法回顾性评估了用于伽玛刀放射外科手术(GKRS)的 26 个多发性转移性脑肿瘤(MET)磁共振数据集。使用市售软件进行畸变校正。使用 MacDonald 标准、欧几里得距离和 Dice 相似性系数 (DSC) 评估了校正和未校正肿瘤体积之间的几何一致性。使用未校正的肿瘤体积生成SRS计划,并对其进行评估,以确定其是否覆盖校正后的肿瘤体积。结果中位靶体积为0.38立方厘米(范围为0.01-12.38立方厘米)。MET的最大位移量为2.87毫米,中位位移量为0.55毫米(范围为0.1-2.87毫米)。未校正磁共振成像与校正磁共振成像之间的中位 DSC 为 0.92,最令人担忧的病例的 DSC 为 0.46。虽然所有计划都符合未校正肿瘤体积至少98%(中位数99.55%,范围98.1-100%)接受至少100%处方剂量的优化标准,但校正后肿瘤体积接受总处方剂量的百分比中位数为95.45%(范围23.1-99.5%)。建议定期使用校正 MRI 进行 SRS 规划,因为畸变有时足以导致 SRS 目标的容积丢失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Brain & spine
Brain & spine Surgery
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
71 days
期刊最新文献
Fat beyond muscle: Assessing epimuscular fat of the lumbar spine and its association with vertebral level, demographics, BMI, and low back pain. The application of medical ethics in the developing countries - A neurosurgical perspective. Machine learning predictive model for lumbar disc reherniation following microsurgical discectomy. A systematic review evaluating the association of atherosclerosis and lumbar degenerative disc disease. Consensus statement by the Belgian Society of Neurosurgery and literature review on the diagnosis and management of postoperative spinal epidural hematoma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1