Very Long-term Longitudinal Follow-up of Heart Failure on the REMADHE Trial

Edimar Alcides Bocchi, Guilherme Veiga Guimaraes, Cristian Espinoza, Silvia Moreira-Ferreira, Bruno Biselli, Paulo Chizzola, Robinson Mulhoz, Julia Tizue Fukushima, Fatima Cruz
{"title":"Very Long-term Longitudinal Follow-up of Heart Failure on the REMADHE Trial","authors":"Edimar Alcides Bocchi, Guilherme Veiga Guimaraes, Cristian Espinoza, Silvia Moreira-Ferreira, Bruno Biselli, Paulo Chizzola, Robinson Mulhoz, Julia Tizue Fukushima, Fatima Cruz","doi":"10.1101/2024.03.26.24304939","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Heart failure (HF) is associated with frequent hospitalization and worse prognosis. Prognosis factors and survival in very long-term follow-up have not been reported in HF. HF disease management programs(DMP) results are contradictory. DMP efficacy in very long-term follow-up is unknown. We studied the very long-term follow-up of up to 23.6 years and prognostic factors of HF in 412 patients under GDMT included in the REMADHE trial. Methods: The REMADHE trial was a prospective, single-center, randomized trial comparing DMP versus usual care(C). The first patient was randomized on October 5, 1999. The primary outcome of this extended REMADHE was all-cause mortality. Results: The all-cause mortality rate was 88.3%. HF was the first cause of death followed by death at home. Mortality was higher in the first 6-year follow-up. The predictive variables in multivariate analysis associated with mortality were age >52 years (P=0.015), Chagas etiology (P=0.010), LVEF <45% (P=0.008), use of digoxin (P=0.002), functional class IV (P=0.01), increase in urea (P=0.03), and reduction of lymphocytes (P=0.005). In very long-term follow-up, DMP did not affect mortality in patients under GDMT. HF as a cause of death was more frequent in the C group. Chagas disease, LVEF <45%, and renal function were associated with different modes of death.\nConclusion: DMP was not effective in reducing very-long term mortality; however, the causes of death had changed. Our findings that age, LVEF, Chagas disease, functional class, renal function, lymphocytes, and digoxin use were associated with poor prognosis could influence future strategies to improve HF management.","PeriodicalId":501260,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Nursing","volume":"65 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.26.24304939","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Heart failure (HF) is associated with frequent hospitalization and worse prognosis. Prognosis factors and survival in very long-term follow-up have not been reported in HF. HF disease management programs(DMP) results are contradictory. DMP efficacy in very long-term follow-up is unknown. We studied the very long-term follow-up of up to 23.6 years and prognostic factors of HF in 412 patients under GDMT included in the REMADHE trial. Methods: The REMADHE trial was a prospective, single-center, randomized trial comparing DMP versus usual care(C). The first patient was randomized on October 5, 1999. The primary outcome of this extended REMADHE was all-cause mortality. Results: The all-cause mortality rate was 88.3%. HF was the first cause of death followed by death at home. Mortality was higher in the first 6-year follow-up. The predictive variables in multivariate analysis associated with mortality were age >52 years (P=0.015), Chagas etiology (P=0.010), LVEF <45% (P=0.008), use of digoxin (P=0.002), functional class IV (P=0.01), increase in urea (P=0.03), and reduction of lymphocytes (P=0.005). In very long-term follow-up, DMP did not affect mortality in patients under GDMT. HF as a cause of death was more frequent in the C group. Chagas disease, LVEF <45%, and renal function were associated with different modes of death. Conclusion: DMP was not effective in reducing very-long term mortality; however, the causes of death had changed. Our findings that age, LVEF, Chagas disease, functional class, renal function, lymphocytes, and digoxin use were associated with poor prognosis could influence future strategies to improve HF management.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
REMADHE 试验对心力衰竭的长期纵向随访
背景:心力衰竭(HF)与频繁住院和预后较差有关。目前还没有关于心力衰竭的预后因素和长期随访存活率的报道。心力衰竭疾病管理计划(DMP)的结果相互矛盾。DMP在长期随访中的疗效尚不清楚。我们研究了 REMADHE 试验中接受 GDMT 的 412 名患者长达 23.6 年的长期随访情况以及心房颤动的预后因素。研究方法REMADHE试验是一项前瞻性、单中心、随机试验,比较了DMP与常规护理(C)。第一例患者于 1999 年 10 月 5 日随机接受治疗。这次延长的 REMADHE 试验的主要结果是全因死亡率。试验结果全因死亡率为 88.3%。高血压是首要死因,其次是在家中死亡。头6年随访的死亡率较高。在多变量分析中,与死亡率相关的预测变量为年龄 52 岁(P=0.015)、恰加斯病因(P=0.010)、LVEF 45%(P=0.008)、使用地高辛(P=0.002)、功能分级 IV 级(P=0.01)、尿素增加(P=0.03)和淋巴细胞减少(P=0.005)。在长期随访中,DMP 并未影响 GDMT 患者的死亡率。C组患者的死因多为心房颤动。恰加斯病、LVEF <45%和肾功能与不同的死亡方式有关:结论:DMP 未能有效降低长期死亡率,但死亡原因发生了变化。我们的研究结果表明,年龄、LVEF、南美锥虫病、功能分级、肾功能、淋巴细胞和地高辛的使用与不良预后有关,这可能会影响未来改善高血压管理的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
SLEEP QUALITY AND CIRCADIAN RHYTHM DISRUPTION IN CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS IN INTENSIVE CARE UNIT Past and present of registered nurse in China--descriptive analysis of longitudinal national statistics of registered nurse Integrating Heart Rate Variability and Psychometric Assessments to Evaluate Stress and Burnout in ICU Nursing Staff: A Pilot Study Enhancing Nursing Education through Mobile Health Clinics: Aligning AACN Core Competencies with Pediatric Clinical Experiences in Rural and Indigenous Communities Self-actualization of families with a cerebrovascular disease patient by nurses, and of self-actualization of nurses themselves: An integrative review based on Family Care/Caring Theory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1