Cross‐Regional Seismic Event Discrimination via Convolutional Neural Networks: Exploring Fine‐Tuning and Ensemble Averaging

IF 2.6 3区 地球科学 Q2 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.1785/0120230198
Valentin Kasburg, Jozef Müller, Tom Eulenfeld, Alexander Breuer, Nina Kukowski
{"title":"Cross‐Regional Seismic Event Discrimination via Convolutional Neural Networks: Exploring Fine‐Tuning and Ensemble Averaging","authors":"Valentin Kasburg, Jozef Müller, Tom Eulenfeld, Alexander Breuer, Nina Kukowski","doi":"10.1785/0120230198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The gradual densification of seismic networks has facilitated the acquisition of large amounts of data. However, alongside natural tectonic earthquakes, seismic networks also record anthropogenic events such as quarry blasts or other induced events. Identifying and distinguishing these events from natural earthquakes requires experienced interpreters to ensure that seismological studies of natural phenomena are not compromised by anthropogenic events. Advanced artificial intelligence methods have already been deployed to tackle this problem. One of the applications includes Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) to discriminate different kinds of events, such as natural earthquakes and quarry blasts. In this study, we investigate the effects of ensemble averaging and fine‐tuning on seismic event discrimination accuracy to estimate the potential of these methods. We compare discrimination accuracy of two different CNN model architectures across three datasets. This was done with the best models from an ensemble of each model architecture, as well as with ensemble averaging and fine‐tuning methods. Soft voting was used for the CNN ensemble predictions. For the transfer learning approach, the models were pretrained with data from two of the datasets (nontarget regions) and fine‐tuned with data from the third one (target region). The results show that ensemble averaging and fine‐tuning of CNN models leads to better generalization of the model predictions. For the region with the lowest numbers of one event type, the combination of ensemble averaging and fine‐tuning led to an increase in discrimination accuracy of up to 4% at station level and up to 10% at event level. We also tested the impact of the amount of training data on the fine‐tuning method, showing, that to create a global model, the selection of comprehensive training data is needed.","PeriodicalId":9444,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1785/0120230198","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The gradual densification of seismic networks has facilitated the acquisition of large amounts of data. However, alongside natural tectonic earthquakes, seismic networks also record anthropogenic events such as quarry blasts or other induced events. Identifying and distinguishing these events from natural earthquakes requires experienced interpreters to ensure that seismological studies of natural phenomena are not compromised by anthropogenic events. Advanced artificial intelligence methods have already been deployed to tackle this problem. One of the applications includes Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) to discriminate different kinds of events, such as natural earthquakes and quarry blasts. In this study, we investigate the effects of ensemble averaging and fine‐tuning on seismic event discrimination accuracy to estimate the potential of these methods. We compare discrimination accuracy of two different CNN model architectures across three datasets. This was done with the best models from an ensemble of each model architecture, as well as with ensemble averaging and fine‐tuning methods. Soft voting was used for the CNN ensemble predictions. For the transfer learning approach, the models were pretrained with data from two of the datasets (nontarget regions) and fine‐tuned with data from the third one (target region). The results show that ensemble averaging and fine‐tuning of CNN models leads to better generalization of the model predictions. For the region with the lowest numbers of one event type, the combination of ensemble averaging and fine‐tuning led to an increase in discrimination accuracy of up to 4% at station level and up to 10% at event level. We also tested the impact of the amount of training data on the fine‐tuning method, showing, that to create a global model, the selection of comprehensive training data is needed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过卷积神经网络进行跨区域地震事件判别:探索微调与集合平均
地震网络的逐渐密集为获取大量数据提供了便利。然而,除了天然构造地震之外,地震台网也记录了人为事件,如采石场爆破或其他诱发事件。识别和区分这些事件与天然地震需要经验丰富的解释人员,以确保对自然现象的地震学研究不会受到人为事件的影响。先进的人工智能方法已被用于解决这一问题。其中一种应用包括卷积神经网络(CNN),用于区分不同类型的事件,如天然地震和采石场爆炸。在本研究中,我们研究了集合平均和微调对地震事件判别准确性的影响,以估计这些方法的潜力。我们比较了三种数据集中两种不同 CNN 模型架构的判别准确性。我们使用了每个模型架构集合中的最佳模型,以及集合平均和微调方法。在 CNN 集合预测中使用了软投票。在迁移学习方法中,使用两个数据集(非目标区域)的数据对模型进行了预训练,并使用第三个数据集(目标区域)的数据对模型进行了微调。结果表明,对 CNN 模型进行集合平均和微调可使模型预测的泛化效果更好。对于一个事件类型数量最少的区域,集合平均和微调相结合,在站点层面上提高了高达 4% 的判别准确率,在事件层面上提高了高达 10%的判别准确率。我们还测试了训练数据量对微调方法的影响,结果表明,要创建一个全局模型,需要选择全面的训练数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
13.30%
发文量
140
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, commonly referred to as BSSA, (ISSN 0037-1106) is the premier journal of advanced research in earthquake seismology and related disciplines. It first appeared in 1911 and became a bimonthly in 1963. Each issue is composed of scientific papers on the various aspects of seismology, including investigation of specific earthquakes, theoretical and observational studies of seismic waves, inverse methods for determining the structure of the Earth or the dynamics of the earthquake source, seismometry, earthquake hazard and risk estimation, seismotectonics, and earthquake engineering. Special issues focus on important earthquakes or rapidly changing topics in seismology. BSSA is published by the Seismological Society of America.
期刊最新文献
Broadband Ground‐Motion Synthesis via Generative Adversarial Neural Operators: Development and Validation Site‐Specific Ground‐Motion Waveform Generation Using a Conditional Generative Adversarial Network and Generalized Inversion Technique Ground‐Motion Model for Small‐to‐Moderate Potentially Induced Earthquakes Using an Ensemble Machine Learning Approach for CENA Stochastic Simulation of Pulse‐Like Ground Motions Using Wavelet Packets Imaging Upper‐Mantle Anisotropy with Transdimensional Bayesian Monte Carlo Sampling
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1