The current state of training in pain medicine fellowships: An Association of Pain Program Directors (APPD) survey of program directors.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pain Practice Pub Date : 2024-03-30 DOI:10.1111/papr.13373
Sayed Emal Wahezi, Trent D Emerick, Moorice Caparó, Heejung Choi, Yashar Eshraghi, Tahereh Naeimi, Lynn Kohan, Magdalena Anitescu, Thelma Wright, Rene Przkora, Kiran Patel, Tim J Lamer, Susan Moeschler, Ugur Yener, Jonathan Alerte, Radhika Grandhe, Alexander Bautista, Boris Spektor, Kristen Noon, Rajiv Reddy, Uzondu C Osuagwu, Anna Carpenter, Frederic J Gerges, Danielle B Horn, Casey A Murphy, Chong Kim, Scott G Pritzlaff, Cameron Marshall, Gwynne Kirchen, Christine Oryhan, Tejinder S Swaran Singh, Dawood Sayed, Timothy R Lubenow, Nalini Sehgal, Charles E Argoff, Amit Gulati, Miles R Day, Naum Shaparin, Nabil Sibai, Anterpreet Dua, Meredith Barad
{"title":"The current state of training in pain medicine fellowships: An Association of Pain Program Directors (APPD) survey of program directors.","authors":"Sayed Emal Wahezi, Trent D Emerick, Moorice Caparó, Heejung Choi, Yashar Eshraghi, Tahereh Naeimi, Lynn Kohan, Magdalena Anitescu, Thelma Wright, Rene Przkora, Kiran Patel, Tim J Lamer, Susan Moeschler, Ugur Yener, Jonathan Alerte, Radhika Grandhe, Alexander Bautista, Boris Spektor, Kristen Noon, Rajiv Reddy, Uzondu C Osuagwu, Anna Carpenter, Frederic J Gerges, Danielle B Horn, Casey A Murphy, Chong Kim, Scott G Pritzlaff, Cameron Marshall, Gwynne Kirchen, Christine Oryhan, Tejinder S Swaran Singh, Dawood Sayed, Timothy R Lubenow, Nalini Sehgal, Charles E Argoff, Amit Gulati, Miles R Day, Naum Shaparin, Nabil Sibai, Anterpreet Dua, Meredith Barad","doi":"10.1111/papr.13373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) approved the first pain medicine fellowship programs over three decades ago, designed around a pharmacological philosophy. Following that, there has been a rise in the transition of pain medicine education toward a multidisciplinary interventional model based on a tremendous surge of contemporaneous literature in these areas. This trend has created variability in clinical experience and education amongst accredited pain medicine programs with minimal literature evaluating the differences and commonalities in education and experience of different pain medicine fellowships through Program Director (PD) experiences. This study aims to gather insight from pain medicine fellowship program directors across the country to assess clinical and interventional training, providing valuable perspectives on the future of pain medicine education.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study involved 56 PDs of ACGME-accredited pain fellowship programs in the United States. The recruitment process included three phases: advanced notification, invitation, and follow-up to maximize response rate. Participants completed a standard online questionnaire, covering various topics such as subcategory fields, online platforms for supplemental education, clinical experience, postgraduate practice success, and training adequacy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Surveys were completed by 39/56 (69%) standing members of the Association of Pain Program Directors (APPD). All PDs allowed fellows to participate in industry-related and professional society-related procedural workshops, with 59% encouraging these workshops. PDs emphasized the importance of integrity, professionalism, and diligence for long-term success. Fifty-four percent of PDs expressed the need for extension of fellowship training to avoid supplemental education by industry or pain/spine societies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights the challenge of providing adequate training in all Pain Medicine subtopics within a 12-month pain medicine fellowship. PDs suggest the need for additional training for fellows and discuss the importance of curriculum standardization.</p>","PeriodicalId":19974,"journal":{"name":"Pain Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/papr.13373","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) approved the first pain medicine fellowship programs over three decades ago, designed around a pharmacological philosophy. Following that, there has been a rise in the transition of pain medicine education toward a multidisciplinary interventional model based on a tremendous surge of contemporaneous literature in these areas. This trend has created variability in clinical experience and education amongst accredited pain medicine programs with minimal literature evaluating the differences and commonalities in education and experience of different pain medicine fellowships through Program Director (PD) experiences. This study aims to gather insight from pain medicine fellowship program directors across the country to assess clinical and interventional training, providing valuable perspectives on the future of pain medicine education.

Methods: This study involved 56 PDs of ACGME-accredited pain fellowship programs in the United States. The recruitment process included three phases: advanced notification, invitation, and follow-up to maximize response rate. Participants completed a standard online questionnaire, covering various topics such as subcategory fields, online platforms for supplemental education, clinical experience, postgraduate practice success, and training adequacy.

Results: Surveys were completed by 39/56 (69%) standing members of the Association of Pain Program Directors (APPD). All PDs allowed fellows to participate in industry-related and professional society-related procedural workshops, with 59% encouraging these workshops. PDs emphasized the importance of integrity, professionalism, and diligence for long-term success. Fifty-four percent of PDs expressed the need for extension of fellowship training to avoid supplemental education by industry or pain/spine societies.

Conclusion: This study highlights the challenge of providing adequate training in all Pain Medicine subtopics within a 12-month pain medicine fellowship. PDs suggest the need for additional training for fellows and discuss the importance of curriculum standardization.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
疼痛医学研究员培训的现状:疼痛项目主任协会 (APPD) 对项目主任的调查。
简介:三十多年前,美国毕业医学教育认证委员会(ACGME)批准了第一批疼痛医学奖学金项目,这些项目是围绕药理学理念设计的。此后,基于这些领域大量同期文献的涌现,疼痛医学教育开始向多学科介入模式过渡。这一趋势造成了经认证的疼痛医学项目在临床经验和教育方面的差异,而通过项目主任(PD)的经验来评估不同疼痛医学奖学金在教育和经验方面的差异和共性的文献却少之又少。本研究旨在收集全国各地疼痛医学奖学金项目主任的见解,以评估临床和介入培训,为疼痛医学教育的未来提供有价值的观点:本研究涉及美国经 ACGME 认证的疼痛研究项目的 56 名项目主任。招募过程包括三个阶段:提前通知、邀请和后续跟踪,以最大限度地提高回复率。参与者填写了一份标准的在线问卷,内容涉及子类别领域、补充教育在线平台、临床经验、研究生实践成功率和培训充分性等多个主题:疼痛项目主任协会(APPD)的39/56(69%)名长期会员完成了调查。所有项目主任都允许学员参加行业相关和专业协会相关的程序研讨会,其中59%的项目主任鼓励学员参加这些研讨会。项目主任强调了诚信、专业和勤奋对长期成功的重要性。54%的专业医师表示有必要扩大研究员培训,以避免行业或疼痛/脊柱学会的补充教育:本研究强调了在为期 12 个月的疼痛医学研究金中提供所有疼痛医学子课题的充分培训所面临的挑战。专业医师建议需要对研究员进行额外培训,并讨论了课程标准化的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pain Practice
Pain Practice ANESTHESIOLOGY-CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.80%
发文量
92
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Pain Practice, the official journal of the World Institute of Pain, publishes international multidisciplinary articles on pain and analgesia that provide its readership with up-to-date research, evaluation methods, and techniques for pain management. Special sections including the Consultant’s Corner, Images in Pain Practice, Case Studies from Mayo, Tutorials, and the Evidence-Based Medicine combine to give pain researchers, pain clinicians and pain fellows in training a systematic approach to continuing education in pain medicine. Prior to publication, all articles and reviews undergo peer review by at least two experts in the field.
期刊最新文献
The sacroiliac joint. Lead fracture in dorsal root ganglion stimulation. Expression of cytokines at baseline correlate/predict in the disc the outcome of surgery after disc degeneration: A 12-month follow-up study. Septic arthritis of the cervical facet joint: Clinical report and review of the literature. Fatty infiltration of the erector spinae.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1