Tidal expiratory flow limitation during exercise is unrelated to peripheral hypercapnic chemosensitivity

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 PHYSIOLOGY Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology Pub Date : 2024-03-27 DOI:10.1016/j.resp.2024.104254
Leah M. Mann , Jason S. Chan , Sarah A. Angus , Connor J. Doherty , Benjamin P. Thompson , Glen E. Foster , Paolo B. Dominelli
{"title":"Tidal expiratory flow limitation during exercise is unrelated to peripheral hypercapnic chemosensitivity","authors":"Leah M. Mann ,&nbsp;Jason S. Chan ,&nbsp;Sarah A. Angus ,&nbsp;Connor J. Doherty ,&nbsp;Benjamin P. Thompson ,&nbsp;Glen E. Foster ,&nbsp;Paolo B. Dominelli","doi":"10.1016/j.resp.2024.104254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We sought to determine if peripheral hypercapnic chemosensitivity is related to expiratory flow limitation (EFL) during exercise. Twenty participants completed one testing day which consisted of peripheral hypercapnic chemosensitivity testing and a maximal exercise test to exhaustion. The chemosensitivity testing consisting of two breaths of 10% CO<sub>2</sub> (O<sub>2</sub>∼21%) repeated 5 times during seated rest and the first 2 exercise intensities during the maximal exercise test. Following chemosensitivity testing, participants continued cycling with the intensity increasing 20 W every 1.5 minutes till exhaustion. Maximal expiratory flow-volume curves were derived from forced expiratory capacity maneuvers performed before and after exercise at varying efforts. Inspiratory capacity maneuvers were performed during each exercise stage to determine EFL. There was no difference between the EFL and non-EFL hypercapnic chemoresponse (mean response during exercise 0.96 ± 0.46 and 0.91 ± 0.33 l min<sup>−1</sup> mmHg<sup>−1</sup>, p=0.783). Peripheral hypercapnic chemosensitivity during mild exercise does not appear to be related to the development of EFL during exercise.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20961,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology","volume":"325 ","pages":"Article 104254"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1569904824000478","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We sought to determine if peripheral hypercapnic chemosensitivity is related to expiratory flow limitation (EFL) during exercise. Twenty participants completed one testing day which consisted of peripheral hypercapnic chemosensitivity testing and a maximal exercise test to exhaustion. The chemosensitivity testing consisting of two breaths of 10% CO2 (O2∼21%) repeated 5 times during seated rest and the first 2 exercise intensities during the maximal exercise test. Following chemosensitivity testing, participants continued cycling with the intensity increasing 20 W every 1.5 minutes till exhaustion. Maximal expiratory flow-volume curves were derived from forced expiratory capacity maneuvers performed before and after exercise at varying efforts. Inspiratory capacity maneuvers were performed during each exercise stage to determine EFL. There was no difference between the EFL and non-EFL hypercapnic chemoresponse (mean response during exercise 0.96 ± 0.46 and 0.91 ± 0.33 l min−1 mmHg−1, p=0.783). Peripheral hypercapnic chemosensitivity during mild exercise does not appear to be related to the development of EFL during exercise.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
运动时潮气呼出流量限制与外周高碳酸血症化学敏感性无关。
我们试图确定外周高碳酸血症化学敏感性是否与运动时呼气流量限制(EFL)有关。20 名参与者完成了一天的测试,包括外周高碳酸血症化学敏感性测试和最大运动量测试。化学敏感性测试包括在坐位休息和最大运动测试的前两个运动强度期间重复 5 次呼吸两次 10% CO2(O2~21%)。化学敏感性测试后,参与者继续骑自行车,强度每 1.5 分钟增加 20 瓦,直至力竭。最大呼气流量-容积曲线是通过在不同强度的运动前后进行的强制呼气能力操作得出的。在每个运动阶段都进行了吸气容量操作,以确定 EFL。EFL 和非 EFL 高碳酸血症反应之间没有差异(运动期间的平均反应分别为 0.96 ± 0.46 和 0.91 ± 0.33lmin-1 mmHg-1,P=0.783)。轻度运动时的外周高碳酸血症化学敏感性似乎与运动时 EFL 的发生无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
104
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology (RESPNB) publishes original articles and invited reviews concerning physiology and pathophysiology of respiration in its broadest sense. Although a special focus is on topics in neurobiology, high quality papers in respiratory molecular and cellular biology are also welcome, as are high-quality papers in traditional areas, such as: -Mechanics of breathing- Gas exchange and acid-base balance- Respiration at rest and exercise- Respiration in unusual conditions, like high or low pressure or changes of temperature, low ambient oxygen- Embryonic and adult respiration- Comparative respiratory physiology. Papers on clinical aspects, original methods, as well as theoretical papers are also considered as long as they foster the understanding of respiratory physiology and pathophysiology.
期刊最新文献
TRPA1 contributes to respiratory depression from tobacco aerosol. THE ACUTE EFFECT OF BILATERAL CATHODIC TRANSCRANIAL DIRECT CURRENT STIMULATION ON RESPIRATORY MUSCLE STRENGTH AND ENDURANCE. Glycolytic metabolism modulation on spinal neuroinflammation and vital functions following cervical spinal cord injury. Impact of microbial diversity on inflammatory cytokines and respiratory pattern measured in whole-body plethysmography in guinea pig models. Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1