Self-sampling with oral rinse to detect oropharyngeal Neisseria gonorrhoeae among men who have sex with men: results from an exploratory study in Belgium (the SSONG Study).

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Sexually Transmitted Infections Pub Date : 2024-05-31 DOI:10.1136/sextrans-2023-056059
Thibaut Vanbaelen, Lida van Petersen, Maartje van Frankenhuijsen, Vicky Cuylaerts, Dorien Van den Bossche, Chris Kenyon, Irith De Baetselier
{"title":"Self-sampling with oral rinse to detect oropharyngeal <i>Neisseria gonorrhoeae</i> among men who have sex with men: results from an exploratory study in Belgium (the SSONG Study).","authors":"Thibaut Vanbaelen, Lida van Petersen, Maartje van Frankenhuijsen, Vicky Cuylaerts, Dorien Van den Bossche, Chris Kenyon, Irith De Baetselier","doi":"10.1136/sextrans-2023-056059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to assess whether a self-collected oral rinse was non-inferior to clinician-collected oropharyngeal swabs to detect <i>Neisseria gonorrhoeae</i> (Ng) using culture and nucleic acid amplification tests (NAAT) among men who have sex with men (MSM), and whether Ng may still be detected in oral rinses for a minimum of 5 days after collection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MSM with a positive Ng result in an oropharyngeal or pooled sample (oropharynx, urethra and anorectum) were approached. Clinician-collected oropharyngeal swabs and oral rinses (15 mL sterile water) were taken. Ng culture and NAAT (Abbott 2000m RealTime System CT/NG assay and in-house PCR) were performed. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed using sensitivity and specificity, and agreement between both techniques using Cohen's kappa statistic. Aliquots of positive oral rinses were left at room temperature for a minimum of 5 days and reanalysed using NAAT. Lastly, participants filled in a questionnaire to explore perceptions of both methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 100 participants between June 2022 and October 2023. 45 individuals (45 of 100) had a positive Ng result in either the oral rinses (42 of 45, 93%) or the swabs (36 of 45, 80%). Sensitivity was higher for oral rinses than swabs (sensitivity=0.93/0.80, specificity=1.0/1.0, respectively) and agreement between both techniques was good (kappa=0.75, p<0.001). Of the 42 positive oral rinses, 37 remained positive after a minimum of 5 days (88.1%). Using culture, 18 individuals had a positive Ng result in either the oral rinses (8 of 18, 44%) or the swabs (16 of 18, 88%). Most participants found the oral rinse easy or very easy to use and would be willing to use the oral rinse for home-based sampling.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We detected more oropharyngeal Ng infections via NAAT using oral rinses than swab samples. However, swabs were better than oral rinses for culturing Ng. Oral rinses might allow for home-based self-sampling to detect oropharyngeal Ng.</p>","PeriodicalId":21624,"journal":{"name":"Sexually Transmitted Infections","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sexually Transmitted Infections","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2023-056059","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: We aimed to assess whether a self-collected oral rinse was non-inferior to clinician-collected oropharyngeal swabs to detect Neisseria gonorrhoeae (Ng) using culture and nucleic acid amplification tests (NAAT) among men who have sex with men (MSM), and whether Ng may still be detected in oral rinses for a minimum of 5 days after collection.

Methods: MSM with a positive Ng result in an oropharyngeal or pooled sample (oropharynx, urethra and anorectum) were approached. Clinician-collected oropharyngeal swabs and oral rinses (15 mL sterile water) were taken. Ng culture and NAAT (Abbott 2000m RealTime System CT/NG assay and in-house PCR) were performed. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed using sensitivity and specificity, and agreement between both techniques using Cohen's kappa statistic. Aliquots of positive oral rinses were left at room temperature for a minimum of 5 days and reanalysed using NAAT. Lastly, participants filled in a questionnaire to explore perceptions of both methods.

Results: We included 100 participants between June 2022 and October 2023. 45 individuals (45 of 100) had a positive Ng result in either the oral rinses (42 of 45, 93%) or the swabs (36 of 45, 80%). Sensitivity was higher for oral rinses than swabs (sensitivity=0.93/0.80, specificity=1.0/1.0, respectively) and agreement between both techniques was good (kappa=0.75, p<0.001). Of the 42 positive oral rinses, 37 remained positive after a minimum of 5 days (88.1%). Using culture, 18 individuals had a positive Ng result in either the oral rinses (8 of 18, 44%) or the swabs (16 of 18, 88%). Most participants found the oral rinse easy or very easy to use and would be willing to use the oral rinse for home-based sampling.

Conclusion: We detected more oropharyngeal Ng infections via NAAT using oral rinses than swab samples. However, swabs were better than oral rinses for culturing Ng. Oral rinses might allow for home-based self-sampling to detect oropharyngeal Ng.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用口腔漱口水自我采样检测男男性行为者口咽淋病奈瑟菌:比利时一项探索性研究(SSONG 研究)的结果。
研究目的我们旨在评估在男男性行为者(MSM)中使用培养和核酸扩增试验(NAAT)检测淋病奈瑟菌(Ng)时,自取口腔漱液是否不逊于临床医生采集的口咽拭子,以及在采集后至少 5 天内是否仍能从口腔漱液中检测到 Ng:方法:对口咽或集合样本(口咽、尿道和肛门直肠)中伍氏结果呈阳性的 MSM 进行接触。临床医生采集口咽拭子和口腔漱口液(15 毫升无菌水)。进行 Ng 培养和 NAAT(雅培 2000m RealTime 系统 CT/NG 检测和内部 PCR)检测。诊断准确性采用灵敏度和特异性进行评估,两种技术之间的一致性采用科恩卡帕统计量进行评估。阳性口腔漱口水等分样品在室温下至少放置 5 天,然后使用 NAAT 重新进行分析。最后,参与者填写了一份调查问卷,以了解对这两种方法的看法:我们在 2022 年 6 月至 2023 年 10 月期间纳入了 100 名参与者。有 45 人(100 人中有 45 人)在口腔漱口水(45 人中有 42 人,93%)或拭子(45 人中有 36 人,80%)中检测出 Ng 阳性结果。口腔漱液的灵敏度高于咽拭子(灵敏度=0.93/0.80,特异性=1.0/1.0),两种技术的一致性良好(kappa=0.75,pConclusion):与咽拭子样本相比,我们使用口腔漱口水通过 NAAT 检测出更多的口咽 Ng 感染。不过,咽拭子比口腔漱液更适合培养伍氏菌。口腔漱口水可用于家庭自我采样,检测口咽部伍氏菌。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sexually Transmitted Infections
Sexually Transmitted Infections 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
96
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Sexually Transmitted Infections is the world’s longest running international journal on sexual health. It aims to keep practitioners, trainees and researchers up to date in the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of all STIs and HIV. The journal publishes original research, descriptive epidemiology, evidence-based reviews and comment on the clinical, public health, sociological and laboratory aspects of sexual health from around the world. We also publish educational articles, letters and other material of interest to readers, along with podcasts and other online material. STI provides a high quality editorial service from submission to publication.
期刊最新文献
HIV epidemic among key populations in Nigeria: results of the integrated biological and behavioural surveillance survey (IBBSS), 2020-2021. Increasing rate of non-Candida albicans yeasts and fluconazole resistance in yeast isolates from women with recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis in Leeds, United Kingdom. Effect of antenatal Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae screening on postdelivery prevalence and vertical transmission in Gaborone, Botswana: findings from an exploratory study. An evaluation of an online STI service across London: reviewing uptake, utility and outcomes over a 4-year period. Management of low-level HIV viremia during antiretroviral therapy: Delphi consensus statement and appraisal of the evidence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1