Outcomes of standard EVAR for juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm in patients unsuitable for fenestrated EVAR and open repair.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Vascular Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-29 DOI:10.1177/17085381241243181
Mingshan Wang, Zhen Liu, Huoying Cai, Jinsong Wang, Yu Zhou, Zuojun Hu
{"title":"Outcomes of standard EVAR for juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm in patients unsuitable for fenestrated EVAR and open repair.","authors":"Mingshan Wang, Zhen Liu, Huoying Cai, Jinsong Wang, Yu Zhou, Zuojun Hu","doi":"10.1177/17085381241243181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveTo evaluate the long-term outcomes of standard endovascular aneurysm repair (S-EVAR) of juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (JAAAs).MethodsData of patients with JAAAs who were unsuitable for fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (F-EVAR) and open repair (OR) and underwent treatment from January 2015 to December 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Computed tomography angiography and ultrasonography of the aorta were performed before discharge, at 6 and 12 months postoperatively, and annually thereafter. The main outcome measures were mortality, type Ia endoleaks, and reintervention.ResultsA total of 62 patients (mean age, 72.1 ± 7.3 years) underwent S-EVAR. The mean aneurysm length and diameter and the proximal neck length and diameter were 110.4 ± 30.9 mm, 57.2 ± 15.9 mm, 8.09 ± 0.97 mm, and 26.05 ± 0.49 mm, respectively. The mean suprarenal and infrarenal aortic angles were 162.9 ± 26° and 144.1 ± 31°, respectively. The mean follow-up duration was 40.6 ± 23.4 months and the 5-year survival rate was 62.2%. Six (9.8%) patients experienced type Ia endoleaks, of whom three underwent endovascular repair at 12, 18, and 24 months, one underwent conversion to OR for AAA rupture at 7 days and died, two had minor endoleaks and were kept under observation, and one declined reintervention at 36 months. The 5-year freedom from reintervention rate was 84.4%. The aneurysm diameter shrank in 50 cases (81%), remained stable in 5 cases (8%), and increased in 7 cases (11.3%). A suprarenal aortic angle <114° was associated with type Ia endoleak (<i>p</i> = .005).ConclusionsIn patients unsuitable for F-EVAR and OR and with a suprarenal aortic angle >114°, the use of S-EVAR for JAAAs can be considered safe and effective. In this study, early and long-term postoperative outcomes demonstrated that S-EVAR achieved satisfactory results in the prevention of aneurysm rupture and associated mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":23549,"journal":{"name":"Vascular","volume":" ","pages":"245-252"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vascular","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17085381241243181","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveTo evaluate the long-term outcomes of standard endovascular aneurysm repair (S-EVAR) of juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (JAAAs).MethodsData of patients with JAAAs who were unsuitable for fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (F-EVAR) and open repair (OR) and underwent treatment from January 2015 to December 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Computed tomography angiography and ultrasonography of the aorta were performed before discharge, at 6 and 12 months postoperatively, and annually thereafter. The main outcome measures were mortality, type Ia endoleaks, and reintervention.ResultsA total of 62 patients (mean age, 72.1 ± 7.3 years) underwent S-EVAR. The mean aneurysm length and diameter and the proximal neck length and diameter were 110.4 ± 30.9 mm, 57.2 ± 15.9 mm, 8.09 ± 0.97 mm, and 26.05 ± 0.49 mm, respectively. The mean suprarenal and infrarenal aortic angles were 162.9 ± 26° and 144.1 ± 31°, respectively. The mean follow-up duration was 40.6 ± 23.4 months and the 5-year survival rate was 62.2%. Six (9.8%) patients experienced type Ia endoleaks, of whom three underwent endovascular repair at 12, 18, and 24 months, one underwent conversion to OR for AAA rupture at 7 days and died, two had minor endoleaks and were kept under observation, and one declined reintervention at 36 months. The 5-year freedom from reintervention rate was 84.4%. The aneurysm diameter shrank in 50 cases (81%), remained stable in 5 cases (8%), and increased in 7 cases (11.3%). A suprarenal aortic angle <114° was associated with type Ia endoleak (p = .005).ConclusionsIn patients unsuitable for F-EVAR and OR and with a suprarenal aortic angle >114°, the use of S-EVAR for JAAAs can be considered safe and effective. In this study, early and long-term postoperative outcomes demonstrated that S-EVAR achieved satisfactory results in the prevention of aneurysm rupture and associated mortality.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对不适合栅栏式 EVAR 和开放式修复术的患者进行标准 EVAR 治疗并arenal 腹主动脉瘤的结果。
目的:评估标准血管内动脉瘤修补术(S-EVAR)的长期疗效:评估并arenal腹主动脉瘤(JAAA)标准血管内动脉瘤修补术(S-EVAR)的长期疗效:方法:回顾性研究了2015年1月至2021年12月期间不适合进行开孔血管内动脉瘤修补术(F-EVAR)和开放式修补术(OR)并接受治疗的JAAA患者的数据。在出院前、术后 6 个月和 12 个月以及之后每年进行一次主动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影和超声波检查。主要结果指标为死亡率、Ia型内膜渗漏和再次介入治疗:共有 62 名患者(平均年龄为 72.1 ± 7.3 岁)接受了 S-EVAR。动脉瘤的平均长度和直径以及近端颈部的长度和直径分别为 110.4 ± 30.9 毫米、57.2 ± 15.9 毫米、8.09 ± 0.97 毫米和 26.05 ± 0.49 毫米。肾上主动脉角度和肾下主动脉角度的平均值分别为 162.9 ± 26° 和 144.1 ± 31°。平均随访时间为 40.6 ± 23.4 个月,5 年存活率为 62.2%。6名患者(9.8%)发生了Ia型内漏,其中3人在12、18和24个月时接受了血管内修复,1人在7天时因AAA破裂转入手术室并死亡,2人有轻微内漏并继续观察,1人在36个月时拒绝再次介入。5年无再介入率为84.4%。动脉瘤直径缩小的有 50 例(81%),保持稳定的有 5 例(8%),增大的有 7 例(11.3%)。肾上主动脉角度 p = .005):结论:对于不适合进行 F-EVAR 和手术,且肾上主动脉角度大于 114°的患者,使用 S-EVAR 治疗 JAAA 可以说是安全有效的。这项研究的早期和长期术后结果表明,S-EVAR 在预防动脉瘤破裂和相关死亡率方面取得了令人满意的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Vascular
Vascular 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
196
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Vascular provides readers with new and unusual up-to-date articles and case reports focusing on vascular and endovascular topics. It is a highly international forum for the discussion and debate of all aspects of this distinct surgical specialty. It also features opinion pieces, literature reviews and controversial issues presented from various points of view.
期刊最新文献
Basilic vein access as an effective alternative for endovascular embolization of pelvic varicose veins: A retrospective-cohort based population study. A seven-year single-center experience with large-bore percutaneous closure in endovascular aneurysm repair. Comparative efficacy of open endarterectomy versus endovascular treatments in common femoral artery stenocclusive disease: A Bayesian hierarchical meta-analysis. Predicting treatment outcome in sclerotherapy of reticular veins and telangiectasia using machine learning: A comprehensive analysis and performance evaluation. Conservative management of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm secondary to type II endoleak.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1