D X C Yin, S M Chiow, A Karandikar, J P N Goh, B M Manish, J W J Gan, E W Z Fu, H Li, M Y Lim
{"title":"Salvage neck surgery in recurrent nodal NPC: Do all patients require a comprehensive neck dissection in the modern MRI era?","authors":"D X C Yin, S M Chiow, A Karandikar, J P N Goh, B M Manish, J W J Gan, E W Z Fu, H Li, M Y Lim","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The standard treatment for regional failure in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is the radical neck dissection (RND). Our study sought to determine if magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may accurately predict nodal involvement to allow selected levels of neck dissection to be preserved.</p><p><strong>Study design and setting: </strong>We analysed retrospectively all NPC patients in our centre undergoing neck dissections as salvage therapy for nodal recurrence. Nodal involvement based on the preoperative MRI was assessed and compared with postoperative histopathology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective study conducted on patients in our centre with recurrent NPC from February 2002 to February 2017. Patients were identified from the database of the otolaryngology oncology division at our institution. Of these, 28 patients met all our inclusion and exclusion criteria. We calculated sensitivity and specificity as well as average number of nodes per patient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In our study, we calculated the false negative and false positive rates of preoperative MRI neck by levels. Overall sensitivity of MRI picking up disease by level was 76% and specificity was 86%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on our study, we will be missing a total of 10 (7.1%) diseased neck levels in eight (28.5%) patients. MRI alone, therefore, does not provide enough information to allow safe selective preservation of neck levels in surgical salvage of neck recurrences in NPC.</p>","PeriodicalId":39388,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of Malaysia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of Malaysia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: The standard treatment for regional failure in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is the radical neck dissection (RND). Our study sought to determine if magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may accurately predict nodal involvement to allow selected levels of neck dissection to be preserved.
Study design and setting: We analysed retrospectively all NPC patients in our centre undergoing neck dissections as salvage therapy for nodal recurrence. Nodal involvement based on the preoperative MRI was assessed and compared with postoperative histopathology.
Methods: This is a retrospective study conducted on patients in our centre with recurrent NPC from February 2002 to February 2017. Patients were identified from the database of the otolaryngology oncology division at our institution. Of these, 28 patients met all our inclusion and exclusion criteria. We calculated sensitivity and specificity as well as average number of nodes per patient.
Results: In our study, we calculated the false negative and false positive rates of preoperative MRI neck by levels. Overall sensitivity of MRI picking up disease by level was 76% and specificity was 86%.
Conclusion: Based on our study, we will be missing a total of 10 (7.1%) diseased neck levels in eight (28.5%) patients. MRI alone, therefore, does not provide enough information to allow safe selective preservation of neck levels in surgical salvage of neck recurrences in NPC.
期刊介绍：
Published since 1890 this journal originated as the Journal of the Straits Medical Association. With the formation of the Malaysian Medical Association (MMA), the Journal became the official organ, supervised by an editorial board. Some of the early Hon. Editors were Mr. H.M. McGladdery (1960 - 1964), Dr. A.A. Sandosham (1965 - 1977), Prof. Paul C.Y. Chen (1977 - 1987). It is a scientific journal, published quarterly and can be found in medical libraries in many parts of the world. The Journal also enjoys the status of being listed in the Index Medicus, the internationally accepted reference index of medical journals. The editorial columns often reflect the Association''s views and attitudes towards medical problems in the country. The MJM aims to be a peer reviewed scientific journal of the highest quality. We want to ensure that whatever data is published is true and any opinion expressed important to medical science. We believe being Malaysian is our unique niche; our priority will be for scientific knowledge about diseases found in Malaysia and for the practice of medicine in Malaysia. The MJM will archive knowledge about the changing pattern of human diseases and our endeavours to overcome them. It will also document how medicine develops as a profession in the nation. We will communicate and co-operate with other scientific journals in Malaysia. We seek articles that are of educational value to doctors. We will consider all unsolicited articles submitted to the journal and will commission distinguished Malaysians to write relevant review articles. We want to help doctors make better decisions and be good at judging the value of scientific data. We want to help doctors write better, to be articulate and precise.
分享
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
