A sudden shift for Pain Medicine fellowships – A recount of the 2024 match

Sandy Christiansen , Scott Pritzlaff , Alexander Escobar , Lynn Kohan
{"title":"A sudden shift for Pain Medicine fellowships – A recount of the 2024 match","authors":"Sandy Christiansen ,&nbsp;Scott Pritzlaff ,&nbsp;Alexander Escobar ,&nbsp;Lynn Kohan","doi":"10.1016/j.inpm.2024.100404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Pain Medicine, a field that was once considered primarily a specialty of opioid medication management, evolved into a multimodal care model with the goal of limiting reliance on pain medications. Now, we see another revolution—the advancement from percutaneous procedures to minimally invasive surgical procedures.</p><p>Despite these changes, Pain Medicine fellowships have consistently been recognized as a competitive subspecialty with more applicants than the number of available positions – until now. The most recent pain fellowship match suggests an abrupt change to the popularity of the specialty (with over 61 unmatched positions and over 35 unfilled programs) for applicants expected to matriculate in the year 2024 [1]. Unfilled positions have risen from 5% to 15% in the past three years. Similarly, unfilled programs have risen from 10% to 30% in the past three years.</p><p>Several reasons for this sudden change in popularity have been proposed, including a lucrative general anesthesiology market, increasing difficulties with insurance coverage and reimbursement for procedures, and a dearth of advanced pain procedures performed at academic medicine programs. The field is at a critical juncture, necessitating ongoing discussions and collaboration among stakeholders to ensure that trainees are attracted to this dynamic field and are ultimately equipped to meet the evolving needs of patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100727,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Pain Medicine","volume":"3 2","pages":"Article 100404"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772594424000244/pdfft?md5=aeff814bc6615a58b75c8b554dfdc188&pid=1-s2.0-S2772594424000244-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772594424000244","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pain Medicine, a field that was once considered primarily a specialty of opioid medication management, evolved into a multimodal care model with the goal of limiting reliance on pain medications. Now, we see another revolution—the advancement from percutaneous procedures to minimally invasive surgical procedures.

Despite these changes, Pain Medicine fellowships have consistently been recognized as a competitive subspecialty with more applicants than the number of available positions – until now. The most recent pain fellowship match suggests an abrupt change to the popularity of the specialty (with over 61 unmatched positions and over 35 unfilled programs) for applicants expected to matriculate in the year 2024 [1]. Unfilled positions have risen from 5% to 15% in the past three years. Similarly, unfilled programs have risen from 10% to 30% in the past three years.

Several reasons for this sudden change in popularity have been proposed, including a lucrative general anesthesiology market, increasing difficulties with insurance coverage and reimbursement for procedures, and a dearth of advanced pain procedures performed at academic medicine programs. The field is at a critical juncture, necessitating ongoing discussions and collaboration among stakeholders to ensure that trainees are attracted to this dynamic field and are ultimately equipped to meet the evolving needs of patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
疼痛医学研究金的突变--2024 年比赛回顾
疼痛医学曾一度被认为是阿片类药物治疗的主要专科,后来发展成为一种多模式治疗模式,其目标是限制对止痛药物的依赖。现在,我们看到了另一场革命--从经皮手术发展到微创外科手术。尽管发生了这些变化,疼痛医学研究员职位一直被认为是一个竞争激烈的亚专科,申请者多于可提供的职位数量--直到现在。最近的疼痛研究员职位匹配结果表明,该专业的受欢迎程度突然发生了变化(超过 61 个未匹配职位和超过 35 个未填补项目),预计 2024 年将有申请人进入该专业[1]。在过去三年中,未填补的职位从 5%上升到 15%。造成这种受欢迎程度骤变的原因有多种,包括普通麻醉学市场利润丰厚、保险范围和程序报销方面的困难日益增加,以及学术医学项目中高级疼痛程序的匮乏。该领域正处于一个关键时刻,需要利益相关者之间不断进行讨论和合作,以确保吸引受训者进入这一充满活力的领域,并最终为满足患者不断变化的需求做好准备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Intraosseous basivertebral nerve ablation: A 5-year pooled analysis from three prospective clinical trials. Evaluating the effectiveness of interlaminar epidural steroid injections for cervical radiculopathy using PROMIS as an outcome measure. Spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of complex regional pain syndrome: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Postherpetic neuralgia mimicking lumbar radiculopathy. Comparing the efficacy of intra-articular injection of Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) with corticosteroids (CS) in patients with chronic zygapophyseal joint low back pain confirmed by double intra-articular diagnostic blocks: A triple-blinded randomized multicentric controlled trial with a 6-month follow-up.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1