ChatGPT vs SBST: A Comparative Assessment of Unit Test Suite Generation

IF 6.5 1区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering Pub Date : 2024-03-29 DOI:10.1109/TSE.2024.3382365
Yutian Tang;Zhijie Liu;Zhichao Zhou;Xiapu Luo
{"title":"ChatGPT vs SBST: A Comparative Assessment of Unit Test Suite Generation","authors":"Yutian Tang;Zhijie Liu;Zhichao Zhou;Xiapu Luo","doi":"10.1109/TSE.2024.3382365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated exceptional success in a wide range of general domain tasks, such as question answering and following instructions. Moreover, LLMs have shown potential in various software engineering applications. In this study, we present a systematic comparison of test suites generated by the ChatGPT LLM and the state-of-the-art SBST tool EvoSuite. Our comparison is based on several critical factors, including correctness, readability, code coverage, and bug detection capability. By highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of LLMs (specifically ChatGPT) in generating unit test cases compared to EvoSuite, this work provides valuable insights into the performance of LLMs in solving software engineering problems. Overall, our findings underscore the potential of LLMs in software engineering and pave the way for further research in this area.","PeriodicalId":13324,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10485640/","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated exceptional success in a wide range of general domain tasks, such as question answering and following instructions. Moreover, LLMs have shown potential in various software engineering applications. In this study, we present a systematic comparison of test suites generated by the ChatGPT LLM and the state-of-the-art SBST tool EvoSuite. Our comparison is based on several critical factors, including correctness, readability, code coverage, and bug detection capability. By highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of LLMs (specifically ChatGPT) in generating unit test cases compared to EvoSuite, this work provides valuable insights into the performance of LLMs in solving software engineering problems. Overall, our findings underscore the potential of LLMs in software engineering and pave the way for further research in this area.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ChatGPT 与 SBST:单元测试套件生成的比较评估
大型语言模型(LLM)的最新进展表明,它在问题解答和遵从指令等广泛的通用领域任务中取得了非凡的成功。此外,LLM 在各种软件工程应用中也显示出了潜力。在本研究中,我们对 ChatGPT LLM 和最先进的 SBST 工具 EvoSuite 生成的测试套件进行了系统比较。我们的比较基于几个关键因素,包括正确性、可读性、代码覆盖率和错误检测能力。通过强调 LLM(特别是 ChatGPT)与 EvoSuite 相比在生成单元测试用例方面的优缺点,这项工作为了解 LLM 在解决软件工程问题方面的性能提供了宝贵的见解。总之,我们的研究结果强调了 LLM 在软件工程中的潜力,并为这一领域的进一步研究铺平了道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
10.80%
发文量
724
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering seeks contributions comprising well-defined theoretical results and empirical studies with potential impacts on software construction, analysis, or management. The scope of this Transactions extends from fundamental mechanisms to the development of principles and their application in specific environments. Specific topic areas include: a) Development and maintenance methods and models: Techniques and principles for specifying, designing, and implementing software systems, encompassing notations and process models. b) Assessment methods: Software tests, validation, reliability models, test and diagnosis procedures, software redundancy, design for error control, and measurements and evaluation of process and product aspects. c) Software project management: Productivity factors, cost models, schedule and organizational issues, and standards. d) Tools and environments: Specific tools, integrated tool environments, associated architectures, databases, and parallel and distributed processing issues. e) System issues: Hardware-software trade-offs. f) State-of-the-art surveys: Syntheses and comprehensive reviews of the historical development within specific areas of interest.
期刊最新文献
Fast and Precise Static Null Exception Analysis with Synergistic Preprocessing Towards a Cognitive Model of Dynamic Debugging: Does Identifier Construction Matter? SCAnoGenerator: Automatic Anomaly Injection for Ethereum Smart Contracts Metamorphic Testing of Image Captioning Systems via Image-Level Reduction Mitigating Noise in Quantum Software Testing Using Machine Learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1