Impact of Gender on Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Complications: Analysis of 27 Million Hospitalizations.

Kanwal Bains, Humzah Iqbal, Amit Attri, Mukul Dhiman, Ishandeep Singh, Isha Kohli, Hunza Chaudhry, Dino Dukovic, Aalam Sohal, Juliana Yang
{"title":"Impact of Gender on Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Complications: Analysis of 27 Million Hospitalizations.","authors":"Kanwal Bains, Humzah Iqbal, Amit Attri, Mukul Dhiman, Ishandeep Singh, Isha Kohli, Hunza Chaudhry, Dino Dukovic, Aalam Sohal, Juliana Yang","doi":"10.15403/jgld-5174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Previous studies have reported gender differences in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). These studies have also reported differences based on gender in the rates of complications. In this study, we aim to identify gender disparities in the rates of GERD complications in the United States.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We queried the 2016-2020 National Inpatient Sample database to identify patients with GERD. Patients with eosinophilic esophagitis or missing demographics were excluded. We compared patient demographics, comorbidities and complications based on gender. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify the impact of gender on complications of GERD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>27.2 million patients were included in the analysis. Out of them, 58.4% of the hospitalized patients with GERD were female. Majority of the women were White (75%), aged>65 years (57.5%) and were in the Medicare group (64%). After adjusting for confounders, females were noted to have lower odds of esophagitis (aOR=0.85, 95%CI: 0.84-0.86, p<0.001), esophageal stricture (aOR=0.95, 95%CI: 0.93-0.97, p<0.001), Barrett's esophagus (aOR=0.58, 95%CI: 0.57-0.59, p<0.001) and esophageal cancer (aOR=0.22, 95%CI: 0.21-0.23, p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study confirms the findings of previous literature that females, despite comprising the majority of the study population, had a lower incidence of GERD related complications. Further studies identifying the underlying reason for these differences are required.</p>","PeriodicalId":94081,"journal":{"name":"Journal of gastrointestinal and liver diseases : JGLD","volume":"33 1","pages":"19-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of gastrointestinal and liver diseases : JGLD","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15403/jgld-5174","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Previous studies have reported gender differences in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). These studies have also reported differences based on gender in the rates of complications. In this study, we aim to identify gender disparities in the rates of GERD complications in the United States.

Methods: We queried the 2016-2020 National Inpatient Sample database to identify patients with GERD. Patients with eosinophilic esophagitis or missing demographics were excluded. We compared patient demographics, comorbidities and complications based on gender. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify the impact of gender on complications of GERD.

Results: 27.2 million patients were included in the analysis. Out of them, 58.4% of the hospitalized patients with GERD were female. Majority of the women were White (75%), aged>65 years (57.5%) and were in the Medicare group (64%). After adjusting for confounders, females were noted to have lower odds of esophagitis (aOR=0.85, 95%CI: 0.84-0.86, p<0.001), esophageal stricture (aOR=0.95, 95%CI: 0.93-0.97, p<0.001), Barrett's esophagus (aOR=0.58, 95%CI: 0.57-0.59, p<0.001) and esophageal cancer (aOR=0.22, 95%CI: 0.21-0.23, p<0.001).

Conclusions: Our study confirms the findings of previous literature that females, despite comprising the majority of the study population, had a lower incidence of GERD related complications. Further studies identifying the underlying reason for these differences are required.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
性别对胃食管反流病并发症的影响:2,700万次住院分析
背景和目的:以往的研究报告了胃食管反流病患者的性别差异。这些研究还报告了并发症发生率的性别差异。在本研究中,我们旨在确定美国胃食管反流病并发症发生率的性别差异:我们查询了 2016-2020 年全国住院病人抽样数据库,以确定胃食管反流病患者。嗜酸性粒细胞食管炎患者或人口统计数据缺失的患者被排除在外。我们根据性别比较了患者的人口统计学特征、合并症和并发症。我们使用多变量逻辑回归分析来确定性别对胃食管反流并发症的影响。其中,58.4%的胃食管反流症住院患者为女性。大多数女性为白人(75%),年龄大于 65 岁(57.5%),属于医疗保险群体(64%)。在对混杂因素进行调整后,发现女性患食管炎的几率较低(aOR=0.85,95%CI:0.84-0.86,p结论:我们的研究证实了以往文献的结论,即尽管女性占研究人群的大多数,但其胃食管反流相关并发症的发病率较低。需要进一步研究确定这些差异的根本原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Navigating the 'Pits and Perils' of Analgesic Therapy in Advanced Liver Disease and Cirrhosis. Anatomical Benchmarks in the Training of Gastroenterologists. Lynch Syndrome-associated Genomic Variants. Prevalence of Celiac Disease in Romania. The Role of Adipokines in Chronic Pancreatitis. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1