History and evolution of blood pressure measurement.

IF 2.6 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Clinical Hypertension Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.1186/s40885-024-00268-7
Su A Noh, Hwang-Soo Kim, Si-Hyuck Kang, Chang-Hwan Yoon, Tae-Jin Youn, In-Ho Chae
{"title":"History and evolution of blood pressure measurement.","authors":"Su A Noh, Hwang-Soo Kim, Si-Hyuck Kang, Chang-Hwan Yoon, Tae-Jin Youn, In-Ho Chae","doi":"10.1186/s40885-024-00268-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hypertension is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Hypertension mostly accompanies no symptoms, and therefore blood pressure (BP) measurement is the only way for early recognition and timely treatment. Methods for BP measurement have a long history of development and improvement. Invasive method via arterial cannulation was first proven possible in the 1800's. Subsequent scientific progress led to the development of the auscultatory method, also known as Korotkoff' sound, and the oscillometric method, which enabled clinically available BP measurement. However, hypertension management status is still poor. Globally, less than half of adults are aware of their hypertension diagnosis, and only one-third of them being treated are under control. Novel methods are actively investigated thanks to technological advances such as sensors and machine learning in addition to the clinical needs for easier and more convenient BP measurement. Each method adopts different technologies with its own specific advantages and disadvantages. Promises of novel methods include comprehensive information on out-of-office BP capturing dynamic short-term and long-term fluctuations. However, there are still pitfalls such as the need for regular calibration since most novel methods capture relative BP changes rather than an absolute value. In addition, there is growing concern on their accuracy and precision as conventional validation protocols are inappropriate for cuffless continuous methods. In this article, we provide a comprehensive overview of the past and present of BP measurement methods. Novel and emerging technologies are also introduced with respect to their potential applications and limitations.</p>","PeriodicalId":10480,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Hypertension","volume":"30 1","pages":"9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10983645/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40885-024-00268-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hypertension is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Hypertension mostly accompanies no symptoms, and therefore blood pressure (BP) measurement is the only way for early recognition and timely treatment. Methods for BP measurement have a long history of development and improvement. Invasive method via arterial cannulation was first proven possible in the 1800's. Subsequent scientific progress led to the development of the auscultatory method, also known as Korotkoff' sound, and the oscillometric method, which enabled clinically available BP measurement. However, hypertension management status is still poor. Globally, less than half of adults are aware of their hypertension diagnosis, and only one-third of them being treated are under control. Novel methods are actively investigated thanks to technological advances such as sensors and machine learning in addition to the clinical needs for easier and more convenient BP measurement. Each method adopts different technologies with its own specific advantages and disadvantages. Promises of novel methods include comprehensive information on out-of-office BP capturing dynamic short-term and long-term fluctuations. However, there are still pitfalls such as the need for regular calibration since most novel methods capture relative BP changes rather than an absolute value. In addition, there is growing concern on their accuracy and precision as conventional validation protocols are inappropriate for cuffless continuous methods. In this article, we provide a comprehensive overview of the past and present of BP measurement methods. Novel and emerging technologies are also introduced with respect to their potential applications and limitations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
血压测量的历史和演变。
高血压是全球发病和死亡的主要原因。高血压大多没有任何症状,因此测量血压是早期识别和及时治疗的唯一方法。血压测量方法的发展和改进由来已久。通过动脉插管的侵入式方法在 19 世纪首次被证明是可行的。随后的科学进步导致了听诊法(又称 Korotkoff 音)和示波法的发展,从而使血压测量可以在临床上使用。然而,高血压的管理状况仍然不佳。在全球范围内,只有不到一半的成年人知道自己被诊断患有高血压,接受治疗的患者中只有三分之一的人血压得到了控制。由于传感器和机器学习等技术的进步,以及临床对更简单、更方便的血压测量的需求,人们正在积极研究新的方法。每种方法都采用了不同的技术,各有利弊。新型方法的优点包括能捕捉短期和长期动态波动的诊室外血压综合信息。但仍存在一些缺陷,如需要定期校准,因为大多数新型方法捕捉的是相对血压变化而非绝对值。此外,由于传统的验证方案不适合无袖带连续方法,因此人们对其准确性和精确性的担忧日益增加。本文全面概述了血压测量方法的过去和现在。同时还介绍了新技术和新兴技术的潜在应用和局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Hypertension
Clinical Hypertension PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
4.80%
发文量
34
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Age and blood pressure stratified healthy vascular aging, organ damage and prognosis in the community-dwelling elderly: insights from the North Shanghai Study. Amlodipine increases risk of primary open-angle glaucoma. Association of aerobic and muscle-strengthening physical activity with chronic kidney disease in participants with hypertension. Cost-effectiveness of strengthening blood pressure classification in South Korea: comparing the 2017 ACC/AHA and KSH guidelines. Editorial: The 30-year journey of the clinical hypertension.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1