A new and simple score to predict adequate and deep response to ursodeoxycholic acid in patients with primary biliary cholangitis: the ALP-A score.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-25 DOI:10.1097/MEG.0000000000002744
Guilherme Grossi Lopes Cançado, Nathalia Mota de Faria Gomes, Cláudia Alves Couto, Eduardo Luiz Rachid Cançado, Debora Raquel Benedita Terrabuio, Cristiane Alves Villela-Nogueira, Michelle Harriz Braga, Mateus Jorge Nardelli, Luciana Costa Faria, Elze Maria Gomes Oliveira, Vivian Rotman, Maria Beatriz Oliveira, Simone Muniz Carvalho Fernandes da Cunha, Daniel Ferraz de Campos Mazo, Liliana Sampaio Costa Mendes, Claudia Alexandra Pontes Ivantes, Liana Codes, Valéria Ferreira de Almeida E Borges, Fabio Heleno de Lima Pace, Mário Guimarães Pessôa, Izabelle Venturini Signorelli, Gabriela Perdomo Coral, Paulo Lisboa Bittencourt, Patrícia Fucuta, Roberto José de Carvalho Filho, Maria Lucia Gomes Ferraz
{"title":"A new and simple score to predict adequate and deep response to ursodeoxycholic acid in patients with primary biliary cholangitis: the ALP-A score.","authors":"Guilherme Grossi Lopes Cançado, Nathalia Mota de Faria Gomes, Cláudia Alves Couto, Eduardo Luiz Rachid Cançado, Debora Raquel Benedita Terrabuio, Cristiane Alves Villela-Nogueira, Michelle Harriz Braga, Mateus Jorge Nardelli, Luciana Costa Faria, Elze Maria Gomes Oliveira, Vivian Rotman, Maria Beatriz Oliveira, Simone Muniz Carvalho Fernandes da Cunha, Daniel Ferraz de Campos Mazo, Liliana Sampaio Costa Mendes, Claudia Alexandra Pontes Ivantes, Liana Codes, Valéria Ferreira de Almeida E Borges, Fabio Heleno de Lima Pace, Mário Guimarães Pessôa, Izabelle Venturini Signorelli, Gabriela Perdomo Coral, Paulo Lisboa Bittencourt, Patrícia Fucuta, Roberto José de Carvalho Filho, Maria Lucia Gomes Ferraz","doi":"10.1097/MEG.0000000000002744","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is the standard treatment for primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), but a significant proportion of patients do not respond adequately, leading to increased risk of adverse outcomes. This study aims to develop a new and straightforward predictive score to identify PBC patients likely to achieve a complete response to UDCA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A logistic regression analysis was conducted using a derivation cohort of PBC patients to identify pre-treatment variables associated with response to UDCA. This analysis led to the development of the ALP-A score, calculated as: Age at diagnosis divided by (alkaline phosphatase at diagnosis/upper limit of normal). ALP-A score accuracy was evaluated using the area under the ROC curve, validated with a large external cohort from Brazil. Additionally, the correlation between the ALP-A score and the previously validated UDCA response score (URS) was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ALP-A score had good predictive power for adequate (AUC 0.794; 95% CI, 0.737-0.852) and deep (0.76; 95% CI, 0.69-0.83) UDCA response at 1 year of treatment. A cutoff score of 17 and 23 points was determined to be the optimal threshold for distinguishing adequate and deep responders, respectively, from non-responders. ALP-A score demonstrated a sensitivity of 73%, specificity of 71%, positive predictive value of 65%, negative predictive value of 78%, and overall accuracy of 72% for biochemical response. The URS displayed similar discriminative ability (AUC 0.798; 95% CI, 0.741-0.855).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ALP-A score performs comparably to URS but offers the great advantage of simplicity for routine clinical use. It serves as a valuable tool to identify PBC patients less likely to respond to UDCA treatment, facilitating early consideration of alternative therapeutic approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MEG.0000000000002744","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is the standard treatment for primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), but a significant proportion of patients do not respond adequately, leading to increased risk of adverse outcomes. This study aims to develop a new and straightforward predictive score to identify PBC patients likely to achieve a complete response to UDCA.

Methods: A logistic regression analysis was conducted using a derivation cohort of PBC patients to identify pre-treatment variables associated with response to UDCA. This analysis led to the development of the ALP-A score, calculated as: Age at diagnosis divided by (alkaline phosphatase at diagnosis/upper limit of normal). ALP-A score accuracy was evaluated using the area under the ROC curve, validated with a large external cohort from Brazil. Additionally, the correlation between the ALP-A score and the previously validated UDCA response score (URS) was assessed.

Results: ALP-A score had good predictive power for adequate (AUC 0.794; 95% CI, 0.737-0.852) and deep (0.76; 95% CI, 0.69-0.83) UDCA response at 1 year of treatment. A cutoff score of 17 and 23 points was determined to be the optimal threshold for distinguishing adequate and deep responders, respectively, from non-responders. ALP-A score demonstrated a sensitivity of 73%, specificity of 71%, positive predictive value of 65%, negative predictive value of 78%, and overall accuracy of 72% for biochemical response. The URS displayed similar discriminative ability (AUC 0.798; 95% CI, 0.741-0.855).

Conclusion: ALP-A score performs comparably to URS but offers the great advantage of simplicity for routine clinical use. It serves as a valuable tool to identify PBC patients less likely to respond to UDCA treatment, facilitating early consideration of alternative therapeutic approaches.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预测原发性胆汁性胆管炎患者对熊去氧胆酸的充分和深度反应的新的简单评分:ALP-A 评分。
背景:熊去氧胆酸(UDCA)是治疗原发性胆汁性胆管炎(PBC)的标准疗法,但有相当一部分患者的反应并不充分,导致不良后果的风险增加。本研究旨在开发一种新的、简单明了的预测评分方法,以识别可能对 UDCA 完全应答的 PBC 患者:方法:使用 PBC 患者衍生队列进行逻辑回归分析,以确定与 UDCA 反应相关的治疗前变量。该分析得出了 ALP-A 评分,其计算公式为诊断年龄除以(诊断时的碱性磷酸酶/正常值上限)。ALP-A 评分的准确性采用 ROC 曲线下面积进行评估,并通过巴西的大型外部队列进行验证。此外,还评估了 ALP-A 评分与之前验证的 UDCA 反应评分(URS)之间的相关性:结果:ALP-A 评分对治疗 1 年后的充分(AUC 0.794;95% CI,0.737-0.852)和深度(0.76;95% CI,0.69-0.83)UDCA 反应具有良好的预测能力。17分和23分的临界值分别被确定为区分充分反应者和深度反应者与非反应者的最佳临界值。ALP-A 评分对生化反应的敏感性为 73%,特异性为 71%,阳性预测值为 65%,阴性预测值为 78%,总体准确率为 72%。URS显示出相似的鉴别能力(AUC 0.798; 95% CI, 0.741-0.855):ALP-A评分的表现与URS不相上下,但在常规临床应用中具有简便易行的巨大优势。结论:ALP-A评分的表现与URS不相上下,但在常规临床应用中具有简单易用的巨大优势。它是鉴别对UDCA治疗反应较小的PBC患者的重要工具,有助于及早考虑其他治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1