Evaluation of the Consistency of Two Interproximal Reduction Methods in Clear Aligner Therapy: A Preliminary Study.

IF 0.8 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Turkish Journal of Orthodontics Pub Date : 2024-03-28 DOI:10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2023.2022.158
Pelinsu Güleç Ergün, Ayça Arman Özçırpıcı, Azize Atakan Kocabalkan, Nilüfer İrem Tunçer
{"title":"Evaluation of the Consistency of Two Interproximal Reduction Methods in Clear Aligner Therapy: A Preliminary Study.","authors":"Pelinsu Güleç Ergün, Ayça Arman Özçırpıcı, Azize Atakan Kocabalkan, Nilüfer İrem Tunçer","doi":"10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2023.2022.158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the consistency of two interproximal reduction (IPR) methods in terms of the amount of planned and performed IPR during clear aligner therapy (CAT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-four patients who received IPR using hand-operated abrasive strips (Group 1, 20 patients, 162 teeth) and motor-driven 3/4 oscillating segmental disks (Group 2, 14 patients, 134 teeth) during CAT were included in this preliminary study. The consistency between the planned and performed IPR amounts was evaluated within and between groups for teeth and quadrants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In Group 1, the amount of IPR performed on teeth numbers 22 and 43 and in the upper left quadrant was found to be statistically less than that of planned. On the other hand, the amount of performed IPR was statistically higher on tooth number 44 and in the upper right quadrant, whereas it was statistically less on tooth number 33 when compared with the planned amount in Group 2. The inconsistency between the planned and performed IPR amounts were statistically significant only in Group 1 and for teeth numbers 11, 21, 32, 33, and 43. No significant difference was found when the same parameter was compared between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The consistency of IPR was found to be better with the motor-driven oscillating disk system than with the hand-operated IPR strip system.</p>","PeriodicalId":37013,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Orthodontics","volume":"37 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10986455/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Orthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/TurkJOrthod.2023.2022.158","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the consistency of two interproximal reduction (IPR) methods in terms of the amount of planned and performed IPR during clear aligner therapy (CAT).

Methods: Thirty-four patients who received IPR using hand-operated abrasive strips (Group 1, 20 patients, 162 teeth) and motor-driven 3/4 oscillating segmental disks (Group 2, 14 patients, 134 teeth) during CAT were included in this preliminary study. The consistency between the planned and performed IPR amounts was evaluated within and between groups for teeth and quadrants.

Results: In Group 1, the amount of IPR performed on teeth numbers 22 and 43 and in the upper left quadrant was found to be statistically less than that of planned. On the other hand, the amount of performed IPR was statistically higher on tooth number 44 and in the upper right quadrant, whereas it was statistically less on tooth number 33 when compared with the planned amount in Group 2. The inconsistency between the planned and performed IPR amounts were statistically significant only in Group 1 and for teeth numbers 11, 21, 32, 33, and 43. No significant difference was found when the same parameter was compared between the groups.

Conclusion: The consistency of IPR was found to be better with the motor-driven oscillating disk system than with the hand-operated IPR strip system.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估透明矫治器治疗中两种近端间缩小方法的一致性:初步研究。
目的比较在透明矫治器治疗(CAT)过程中,两种近端间磨削(IPR)方法在计划和执行的IPR量方面的一致性:本初步研究共纳入了 34 名在透明矫治器治疗过程中使用手工操作的研磨条(第 1 组,20 名患者,162 颗牙齿)和电机驱动的 3/4 摆动节段盘(第 2 组,14 名患者,134 颗牙齿)进行 IPR 的患者。对组内和组间牙齿和象限的计划 IPR 量和执行 IPR 量之间的一致性进行了评估:结果:在第 1 组中,第 22 和 43 号牙齿以及左上象限的 IPR 量在统计学上低于计划量。另一方面,在第 2 组中,第 44 号牙齿和右上象限的 IPR 量在统计学上高于计划量,而第 33 号牙齿的 IPR 量在统计学上低于计划量。 计划量和 IPR 量的不一致性仅在第 1 组以及第 11、21、32、33 和 43 号牙齿中具有统计学意义。结论:结论:与手动操作的 IPR 条系统相比,电机驱动摆动盘系统的 IPR 一致性更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Turkish Journal of Orthodontics
Turkish Journal of Orthodontics Dentistry-Orthodontics
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
34
期刊最新文献
Bibliometric Analysis of Maxillary Expansion Publications Trends. Corrosion Behavior of Nickel-Titanium Arch Wires Following the Use of Different Mouthwashes: An In Vivo Study. Effect of Different Liquids and Thermal Aging Procedures on the Shear Bond Strength of APC II, APC Flash-Free, and Conventional Ceramic Brackets: An In Vitro Study. Evaluation of Maxillary Protraction Using a Mini Screw-Retained Palatal C-Shaped Plate and Face Mask. Evaluation of the Effects of Orthopedic Treatment on the Dentofacial Structure and Upper Airway of Subjects with Skeletal Class III Malocclusion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1