Quantifying radiation-induced breast fibrosis by shear-wave elastography in patients with breast cancer: A 12-months-follow-up data of a prospective study

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology Pub Date : 2024-03-30 DOI:10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100773
Wonguen Jung , Jin Chung , Jihae Lee , Kyubo Kim
{"title":"Quantifying radiation-induced breast fibrosis by shear-wave elastography in patients with breast cancer: A 12-months-follow-up data of a prospective study","authors":"Wonguen Jung ,&nbsp;Jin Chung ,&nbsp;Jihae Lee ,&nbsp;Kyubo Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100773","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To assess radiation-induced fibrosis (RIF) using shear-wave elastography (SWE) in patients with breast cancer who received radiotherapy (RT) after breast conserving surgery.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Forty-one patients were enrolled in a prospective study before RT. SWE and B-mode ultrasonography were performed to measure elasticity. For quantitative measurement, the maximum elasticity value was measured in the tumor bed and non-tumor bed of the treated breast, and contralateral breast before RT and at 3, and 12 months after RT. and RIF was recorded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The mean ± standard deviation elasticity values for the tumor bed, non-tumor bed, and contralateral breast were 71.2 ± 74.9 kPa, 19.4 ± 9.8 kPa and 20.3 ± 10.0 kPa before RT; 28.7 ± 26.3 kPa, 15.1 ± 7.0 kPa, and 14.7 ± 6.3 kPa at 12 months after RT, respectively. The elasticity values for all three measurement areas before and 12 months after RT were significantly different (p &lt; 0.001 for tumor bed, p = 0.002 for non-tumor bed, p = 0.001 for contralateral breast). At 12 months follow-up, the distribution of grades of RIF evaluated by CTCAE grade was grade 0 in 43.9 %, grade 1 in 48.8 %, and grade 2 in 7.3 %.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>We demonstrated that SWE enables the evaluation of tissue stiffness to provide quantified information for the RIF of breast cancer. Further studies with long-term follow-up should provide more quantitative data.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10342,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405630824000508/pdfft?md5=65088cf5cc2c156c8694e714d68d2f13&pid=1-s2.0-S2405630824000508-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405630824000508","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To assess radiation-induced fibrosis (RIF) using shear-wave elastography (SWE) in patients with breast cancer who received radiotherapy (RT) after breast conserving surgery.

Methods

Forty-one patients were enrolled in a prospective study before RT. SWE and B-mode ultrasonography were performed to measure elasticity. For quantitative measurement, the maximum elasticity value was measured in the tumor bed and non-tumor bed of the treated breast, and contralateral breast before RT and at 3, and 12 months after RT. and RIF was recorded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0.

Results

The mean ± standard deviation elasticity values for the tumor bed, non-tumor bed, and contralateral breast were 71.2 ± 74.9 kPa, 19.4 ± 9.8 kPa and 20.3 ± 10.0 kPa before RT; 28.7 ± 26.3 kPa, 15.1 ± 7.0 kPa, and 14.7 ± 6.3 kPa at 12 months after RT, respectively. The elasticity values for all three measurement areas before and 12 months after RT were significantly different (p < 0.001 for tumor bed, p = 0.002 for non-tumor bed, p = 0.001 for contralateral breast). At 12 months follow-up, the distribution of grades of RIF evaluated by CTCAE grade was grade 0 in 43.9 %, grade 1 in 48.8 %, and grade 2 in 7.3 %.

Conclusion

We demonstrated that SWE enables the evaluation of tissue stiffness to provide quantified information for the RIF of breast cancer. Further studies with long-term follow-up should provide more quantitative data.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过剪切波弹性成像技术量化乳腺癌患者因辐射导致的乳腺纤维化:一项前瞻性研究的 12 个月随访数据
目的 使用剪切波弹性成像(SWE)评估保乳手术后接受放射治疗(RT)的乳腺癌患者的辐射诱导纤维化(RIF)。41名患者在接受放疗前接受了前瞻性研究,并进行了SWE和B型超声波检查以测量弹性。为了进行定量测量,在 RT 前、RT 后 3 个月和 12 个月测量了治疗乳房肿瘤床和非肿瘤床以及对侧乳房的最大弹性值,并使用《不良事件通用术语标准》(CTCAE)第 5 版记录了 RIF。0.结果RT前肿瘤床、非肿瘤床和对侧乳房的平均±标准差弹性值分别为71.2±74.9 kPa、19.4±9.8 kPa和20.3±10.0 kPa;RT后12个月时分别为28.7±26.3 kPa、15.1±7.0 kPa和14.7±6.3 kPa。所有三个测量区域在 RT 前和 RT 后 12 个月的弹性值均有显著差异(肿瘤床 p < 0.001,非肿瘤床 p = 0.002,对侧乳房 p = 0.001)。在 12 个月的随访中,根据 CTCAE 分级评估的 RIF 等级分布为:0 级占 43.9%,1 级占 48.8%,2 级占 7.3%。进一步的长期随访研究将提供更多量化数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology
Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
114
审稿时长
40 days
期刊最新文献
Feasibility and safety of single-fraction sub-ablative radiotherapy with systemic therapy in colorectal cancer patients with ≤ 10 metastases: A multicenter pilot study (NCT05375708) Measuring patient reported outcomes in brachytherapy: Why we should do it and more importantly how Reirradiation − still navigating uncharted waters? The impact of rectal spacers in MR-guided adaptive radiotherapy Maximum disease diameter is associated with outcomes in stage II follicular lymphoma treated with radiation therapy alone
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1