Beyond Beall's list: The need for contemporary evaluation tools in predatory publishing research

IF 2.4 3区 管理学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Learned Publishing Pub Date : 2024-02-27 DOI:10.1002/leap.1602
Karukh K. Mohammed, Jihad Ibrahim Hama, Fahmi H. Kakamad
{"title":"Beyond Beall's list: The need for contemporary evaluation tools in predatory publishing research","authors":"Karukh K. Mohammed,&nbsp;Jihad Ibrahim Hama,&nbsp;Fahmi H. Kakamad","doi":"10.1002/leap.1602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>\n </p><ul>\n \n <li>Beall's list was an instrumental resource in its prime, however its cessation of updates since 2017 makes its continued use a potential concern.</li>\n \n <li>The landscape of predatory publishing has witnessed profound changes over recent years.</li>\n \n <li>In the context of up-to-date evaluations, many researchers and institutions are turning towards Kscien's list.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51636,"journal":{"name":"Learned Publishing","volume":"37 2","pages":"157-158"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learned Publishing","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/leap.1602","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

  • Beall's list was an instrumental resource in its prime, however its cessation of updates since 2017 makes its continued use a potential concern.
  • The landscape of predatory publishing has witnessed profound changes over recent years.
  • In the context of up-to-date evaluations, many researchers and institutions are turning towards Kscien's list.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Beall 名单之外:掠夺性出版研究需要现代评估工具
Beall 的清单在其鼎盛时期曾是一个重要的资源,但自 2017 年以来,该清单已停止更新,因此继续使用该清单可能会引起关注。 近年来,掠夺性出版的格局发生了深刻变化。 在最新评估的背景下,许多研究人员和机构开始转向 Kscien 名单。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Learned Publishing
Learned Publishing INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
17.90%
发文量
72
期刊最新文献
From Policy to Psychology: Analysing Evaluations of Journal Credibility Through Institutional and Cognitive Lenses Why Not Use the Power of Artificial Intelligence to Encourage the Reading of Scientific Articles? Peer Review at the Crossroads Review Articles, Generative AI and the Remaking of Scholarly Infrastructure Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1