The relationship between speech in noise perception and auditory working memory capacity in monolingual and bilingual adults.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY International Journal of Audiology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-01 DOI:10.1080/14992027.2024.2328556
Ghazaal Shokuhifar, Mohanna Javanbakht, Mohsen Vahedi, Saeideh Mehrkian, Alireza Aghadoost
{"title":"The relationship between speech in noise perception and auditory working memory capacity in monolingual and bilingual adults.","authors":"Ghazaal Shokuhifar, Mohanna Javanbakht, Mohsen Vahedi, Saeideh Mehrkian, Alireza Aghadoost","doi":"10.1080/14992027.2024.2328556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Speech-in-noise perception is dependent on the interaction between sensory and cognitive processes. One factor that can relate to both processes is bilingualism. This study aimed to determine the correlation between auditory-working-memory and speech-in-noise in Persian monolinguals and Kurdish-Persian bilinguals.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Speech-in-noise tests (sentences-in-noise and syllables-in-noise) and auditory-working-memory tests (forward and backward digit span, and n-back) were performed.</p><p><strong>Study sample: </strong>Participants were 48 Kurdish-Persian bilinguals with a mean age of 24 (±4) years and 48 Persian monolinguals with a mean age of 25 (±2) years with normal hearing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both language groups scored within normal limits in all memory and speech-in-noise tests. However, bilinguals performed significantly worse than monolinguals on all auditory-working-memory tests and the sentences-in-noise test. Monolinguals outperformed bilinguals in sentences-in-noise test (∼1.5 dB difference) and all auditory-working-memory tests (∼1 digit difference). The two groups did not significantly differ in syllables-in-noise test. Both groups had a significant correlation between working memory capacity and sentences-in-noise test. However, no significant correlation was found between syllables-in-noise and working memory capacity at any SNR.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Cognitive factors such as auditory working memory appear to correlate with speech-in-noise perception ability (at least at the sentence level) in monolingual and bilinguals young adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":13759,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"131-138"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2024.2328556","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Speech-in-noise perception is dependent on the interaction between sensory and cognitive processes. One factor that can relate to both processes is bilingualism. This study aimed to determine the correlation between auditory-working-memory and speech-in-noise in Persian monolinguals and Kurdish-Persian bilinguals.

Design: Speech-in-noise tests (sentences-in-noise and syllables-in-noise) and auditory-working-memory tests (forward and backward digit span, and n-back) were performed.

Study sample: Participants were 48 Kurdish-Persian bilinguals with a mean age of 24 (±4) years and 48 Persian monolinguals with a mean age of 25 (±2) years with normal hearing.

Results: Both language groups scored within normal limits in all memory and speech-in-noise tests. However, bilinguals performed significantly worse than monolinguals on all auditory-working-memory tests and the sentences-in-noise test. Monolinguals outperformed bilinguals in sentences-in-noise test (∼1.5 dB difference) and all auditory-working-memory tests (∼1 digit difference). The two groups did not significantly differ in syllables-in-noise test. Both groups had a significant correlation between working memory capacity and sentences-in-noise test. However, no significant correlation was found between syllables-in-noise and working memory capacity at any SNR.

Conclusions: Cognitive factors such as auditory working memory appear to correlate with speech-in-noise perception ability (at least at the sentence level) in monolingual and bilinguals young adults.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单语和双语成人的噪声语音感知与听觉工作记忆能力之间的关系。
目标噪音中的语音感知取决于感官和认知过程之间的相互作用。与这两个过程相关的一个因素是双语能力。本研究旨在确定波斯语单语者和库尔德语-波斯语双语者的听觉-工作记忆与噪声语音之间的相关性:研究样本:研究样本:48 名库尔德语和波斯语双语者,平均年龄为 24(±4)岁;48 名波斯语单语者,平均年龄为 25(±2)岁,听力正常:两个语言组在所有记忆和噪音语言测试中的得分都在正常范围内。然而,在所有听觉工作记忆测试和噪音中的句子测试中,双语者的表现明显比单语者差。在噪音中的句子测试(相差∼1.5 dB)和所有听觉工作记忆测试(相差∼1 位数)中,单语者的表现优于双语者。两组在噪音中音节测试中没有明显差异。两组的工作记忆能力与噪音中的句子测试有明显的相关性。然而,在任何信噪比下,噪声中的音节与工作记忆能力之间都没有发现明显的相关性:结论:听觉工作记忆等认知因素似乎与单语和双语青壮年的噪声中语音感知能力(至少在句子层面)相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Audiology
International Journal of Audiology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
14.80%
发文量
133
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Audiology is committed to furthering development of a scientifically robust evidence base for audiology. The journal is published by the British Society of Audiology, the International Society of Audiology and the Nordic Audiological Society.
期刊最新文献
Correction. Sentence intelligibility in noise in children: development of the LIST-k. Predictors of hearing loss disability: a multinational study using the ICF core set. The potential of electrocochleography in explaining the variability in cochlear implant outcomes: a scoping review. What factors do health professionals view as influencing the success of otitis media detection programs for First Nations children? A scoping review and synthesis of qualitative research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1