Radiographical outcomes of a cellular based allograft following foot/ankle arthrodesis in patients with risk for non-union.

IF 1.4 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Orthopedic Reviews Pub Date : 2024-03-30 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.52965/001c.115603
Patrick Donaghue
{"title":"Radiographical outcomes of a cellular based allograft following foot/ankle arthrodesis in patients with risk for non-union.","authors":"Patrick Donaghue","doi":"10.52965/001c.115603","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Morbidity associated with autograft harvest has led to the need for alternative bone grafts during fusion surgical procedures. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of a cellular bone allograft (CBA) in patients who underwent foot/ankle fusion surgery. Retrospective data of patients who underwent foot/ankle arthrodesis using a CBA between XXXX and XXXX were collected from a single site. Patients were at least 18 years of age at the time of surgery and had ankle/foot surgery with Trinity ELITE CBA as the primary or only bone graft. Patients' radiographic union was assessed at three (3) months, six (6) months, nine (9) months, and twelve (12) months. Twenty-two (22) patients and 29 joints were evaluated. The mean age and BMI of the cohort were 54±9yrs and 30.5±6kg/m<sup>2</sup>, respectively. The surgical indications were degenerative joint diseases, trauma, and arthritis. All patients except one had at least one risk factor for non-union. At 12 months, 21 of the 22 patients (95%) attained successful fusion with an average time of 6 months. In addition, there was a 100% fusion among patients with prior failed fusion, nicotine use, diabetes, neuropathy, and osteoporosis. There was no significant difference in time to fusion between patients with non-union risk factor(s) ≤ 1 and ≥ 2 (p=0.71). No complication or adverse event was reported following the surgery. The use of CBA resulted in high fusion among patients with the risk of non-union. CBA is a viable bone graft substitute for autograft in foot/ankle arthrodesis procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":19669,"journal":{"name":"Orthopedic Reviews","volume":"16 ","pages":"115603"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10984644/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopedic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52965/001c.115603","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Morbidity associated with autograft harvest has led to the need for alternative bone grafts during fusion surgical procedures. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of a cellular bone allograft (CBA) in patients who underwent foot/ankle fusion surgery. Retrospective data of patients who underwent foot/ankle arthrodesis using a CBA between XXXX and XXXX were collected from a single site. Patients were at least 18 years of age at the time of surgery and had ankle/foot surgery with Trinity ELITE CBA as the primary or only bone graft. Patients' radiographic union was assessed at three (3) months, six (6) months, nine (9) months, and twelve (12) months. Twenty-two (22) patients and 29 joints were evaluated. The mean age and BMI of the cohort were 54±9yrs and 30.5±6kg/m2, respectively. The surgical indications were degenerative joint diseases, trauma, and arthritis. All patients except one had at least one risk factor for non-union. At 12 months, 21 of the 22 patients (95%) attained successful fusion with an average time of 6 months. In addition, there was a 100% fusion among patients with prior failed fusion, nicotine use, diabetes, neuropathy, and osteoporosis. There was no significant difference in time to fusion between patients with non-union risk factor(s) ≤ 1 and ≥ 2 (p=0.71). No complication or adverse event was reported following the surgery. The use of CBA resulted in high fusion among patients with the risk of non-union. CBA is a viable bone graft substitute for autograft in foot/ankle arthrodesis procedures.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对有不愈合风险的患者进行足/踝关节置换术后使用细胞同种异体移植的放射学效果。
由于自体骨移植的发病率较高,因此需要在融合手术过程中使用替代骨移植。本研究旨在评估细胞骨同种异体移植(CBA)对接受足/踝关节融合手术患者的疗效。研究人员从一个研究机构收集了 XXXX 年至 XXXX 年期间使用 CBA 进行足/踝关节融合术的患者的回顾性数据。患者在接受手术时至少年满 18 周岁,并使用 Trinity ELITE CBA 作为主要或唯一的骨移植材料进行踝关节/足关节手术。分别在三(3)个月、六(6)个月、九(9)个月和十二(12)个月时对患者的放射学结合情况进行评估。共对 22 名患者和 29 个关节进行了评估。患者的平均年龄和体重指数分别为 54±9 岁和 30.5±6kg/m2。手术适应症为退行性关节疾病、创伤和关节炎。除一名患者外,其他所有患者都至少有一个导致骨不连的危险因素。12个月后,22名患者中有21名(95%)成功完成了融合,平均时间为6个月。此外,在融合失败、使用尼古丁、糖尿病、神经病变和骨质疏松症患者中,融合成功率为 100%。非骨融合风险因素≤1和≥2的患者在融合时间上没有明显差异(P=0.71)。术后无并发症或不良事件报告。使用CBA后,患者的融合度很高,但也存在不愈合的风险。在足/踝关节置换术中,CBA是一种可行的自体骨移植替代物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Orthopedic Reviews
Orthopedic Reviews ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
122
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopedic Reviews is an Open Access, online-only, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles concerned with any aspect of orthopedics, as well as diagnosis and treatment, trauma, surgical procedures, arthroscopy, sports medicine, rehabilitation, pediatric and geriatric orthopedics. All bone-related molecular and cell biology, genetics, pathophysiology and epidemiology papers are also welcome. The journal publishes original articles, brief reports, reviews and case reports of general interest.
期刊最新文献
Haemodynamics, side effects and safety of the combination of continuous femoral nerve block and intravenous parecoxib for pain management after Total Knee Arthroplasty: A pilot study. Practice Patterns of Physicians who Perform Caudal Epidural Steroid Injections. Lateral ligament reconstruction and additive medial ligament reconstruction in chronic ankle instability: a retrospective study. Anesthetic Management of a Patient with Renal Cell Carcinoma-Associated Venous Thrombosis and Massive Transfusion. Comparative assessment of bone cement implantation syndrome in cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty: impact in patients with and without preexisting heart disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1