Using Claims Data to Predict Pre-Operative BMI Among Bariatric Surgery Patients: Development of the BMI Before Bariatric Surgery Scoring System (B3S3).

IF 2.3 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pragmatic and Observational Research Pub Date : 2024-03-27 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/POR.S450229
Jenna Wong, Xiaojuan Li, David E Arterburn, Dongdong Li, Elizabeth Messenger-Jones, Rui Wang, Sengwee Toh
{"title":"Using Claims Data to Predict Pre-Operative BMI Among Bariatric Surgery Patients: Development of the BMI Before Bariatric Surgery Scoring System (B3S3).","authors":"Jenna Wong, Xiaojuan Li, David E Arterburn, Dongdong Li, Elizabeth Messenger-Jones, Rui Wang, Sengwee Toh","doi":"10.2147/POR.S450229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lack of body mass index (BMI) measurements limits the utility of claims data for bariatric surgery research, but pre-operative BMI may be imputed due to existence of weight-related diagnosis codes and BMI-related reimbursement requirements. We used a machine learning pipeline to create a claims-based scoring system to predict pre-operative BMI, as documented in the electronic health record (EHR), among patients undergoing a new bariatric surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the Optum Labs Data Warehouse, containing linked de-identified claims and EHR data for commercial or Medicare Advantage enrollees, we identified adults undergoing a new bariatric surgery between January 2011 and June 2018 with a BMI measurement in linked EHR data ≤30 days before the index surgery (n=3226). We constructed predictors from claims data and applied a machine learning pipeline to create a scoring system for pre-operative BMI, the B3S3. We evaluated the B3S3 and a simple linear regression model (benchmark) in test patients whose index surgery occurred concurrent (2011-2017) or prospective (2018) to the training data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The machine learning pipeline yielded a final scoring system that included weight-related diagnosis codes, age, and number of days hospitalized and distinct drugs dispensed in the past 6 months. In concurrent test data, the B3S3 had excellent performance (R<sup>2</sup> 0.862, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.815-0.898) and calibration. The benchmark algorithm had good performance (R<sup>2</sup> 0.750, 95% CI 0.686-0.799) and calibration but both aspects were inferior to the B3S3. Findings in prospective test data were similar.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The B3S3 is an accessible tool that researchers can use with claims data to obtain granular and accurate predicted values of pre-operative BMI, which may enhance confounding control and investigation of effect modification by baseline obesity levels in bariatric surgery studies utilizing claims data.</p>","PeriodicalId":20399,"journal":{"name":"Pragmatic and Observational Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10981874/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pragmatic and Observational Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/POR.S450229","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Lack of body mass index (BMI) measurements limits the utility of claims data for bariatric surgery research, but pre-operative BMI may be imputed due to existence of weight-related diagnosis codes and BMI-related reimbursement requirements. We used a machine learning pipeline to create a claims-based scoring system to predict pre-operative BMI, as documented in the electronic health record (EHR), among patients undergoing a new bariatric surgery.

Methods: Using the Optum Labs Data Warehouse, containing linked de-identified claims and EHR data for commercial or Medicare Advantage enrollees, we identified adults undergoing a new bariatric surgery between January 2011 and June 2018 with a BMI measurement in linked EHR data ≤30 days before the index surgery (n=3226). We constructed predictors from claims data and applied a machine learning pipeline to create a scoring system for pre-operative BMI, the B3S3. We evaluated the B3S3 and a simple linear regression model (benchmark) in test patients whose index surgery occurred concurrent (2011-2017) or prospective (2018) to the training data.

Results: The machine learning pipeline yielded a final scoring system that included weight-related diagnosis codes, age, and number of days hospitalized and distinct drugs dispensed in the past 6 months. In concurrent test data, the B3S3 had excellent performance (R2 0.862, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.815-0.898) and calibration. The benchmark algorithm had good performance (R2 0.750, 95% CI 0.686-0.799) and calibration but both aspects were inferior to the B3S3. Findings in prospective test data were similar.

Conclusion: The B3S3 is an accessible tool that researchers can use with claims data to obtain granular and accurate predicted values of pre-operative BMI, which may enhance confounding control and investigation of effect modification by baseline obesity levels in bariatric surgery studies utilizing claims data.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用索赔数据预测减肥手术患者术前的体重指数:减肥手术前体重指数评分系统 (B3S3) 的开发。
背景:由于缺乏体重指数(BMI)测量数据,限制了减肥手术研究中索赔数据的实用性,但由于存在体重相关的诊断代码和与 BMI 相关的报销要求,术前 BMI 可以被估算出来。我们使用机器学习管道创建了一个基于索赔的评分系统,以预测新接受减肥手术的患者术前的体重指数(如电子健康记录(EHR)中所记录的):我们使用 Optum Labs 数据仓库(其中包含商业或医疗保险优势参保者的链接式去标识理赔和电子病历数据),确定了在 2011 年 1 月至 2018 年 6 月期间接受新减肥手术且在指数手术前≤30 天的链接式电子病历数据中有 BMI 测量值的成人(n=3226)。我们从索赔数据中构建了预测因子,并应用机器学习管道创建了一个术前 BMI 评分系统,即 B3S3。我们在与训练数据同时(2011-2017 年)或前瞻性(2018 年)进行指数手术的测试患者中评估了 B3S3 和简单线性回归模型(基准):机器学习管道产生了一个最终评分系统,该系统包括体重相关的诊断代码、年龄、住院天数以及过去 6 个月内配发的不同药物。在同时进行的测试数据中,B3S3 具有出色的性能(R2 0.862,95% 置信区间 [CI] 0.815-0.898)和校准能力。基准算法具有良好的性能(R2 0.750,95% 置信区间 0.686-0.799)和校准性,但这两方面都不如 B3S3。前瞻性测试数据的结果与此类似:B3S3是一种易于使用的工具,研究人员可将其与索赔数据一起使用,以获得精细、准确的术前BMI预测值,从而在利用索赔数据进行的减肥手术研究中,加强混杂物控制,并调查基线肥胖水平对效果的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pragmatic and Observational Research
Pragmatic and Observational Research MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: Pragmatic and Observational Research is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access journal that publishes data from studies designed to closely reflect medical interventions in real-world clinical practice, providing insights beyond classical randomized controlled trials (RCTs). While RCTs maximize internal validity for cause-and-effect relationships, they often represent only specific patient groups. This journal aims to complement such studies by providing data that better mirrors real-world patients and the usage of medicines, thus informing guidelines and enhancing the applicability of research findings across diverse patient populations encountered in everyday clinical practice.
期刊最新文献
Improving the Transparency and Replicability of Consensus Methods: Respiratory Medicine as a Case Example. Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis Patient Characterization and Real-World Management Approaches in Italy. Comparing Machine Learning and Advanced Methods with Traditional Methods to Generate Weights in Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting: The INFORM Study. Involvement of Root Canal Treatment in Pro-Inflammatory Processes - A Real-World Study. UK Electronic Healthcare Records for Research: A Scientometric Analysis of Respiratory, Cardiovascular, and COVID-19 Publications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1