Annexin A2 antibodies in post-treatment Lyme disease.

IF 3.8 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Therapeutic Advances in Infectious Disease Pub Date : 2024-03-30 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20499361241242971
John B Miller, Alison W Rebman, Marcia Daniela Villegas de Flores, Hong Wang, Erika Darrah, John N Aucott
{"title":"Annexin A2 antibodies in post-treatment Lyme disease.","authors":"John B Miller, Alison W Rebman, Marcia Daniela Villegas de Flores, Hong Wang, Erika Darrah, John N Aucott","doi":"10.1177/20499361241242971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anti-annexin A2 (AA2) antibodies have been described in Lyme arthritis and erythema migrans, although they have not been described in post-treatment Lyme disease (PTLD).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Determine whether anti-AA2 antibodies are present among patients with PTLD and determine the clinical relevance of these antibodies.</p><p><strong>Design and methods: </strong>Anti-AA2 levels were tested serially in a longitudinal cohort of 44 patients with acute Lyme disease, 22 with a return to health (EM RTH), and 22 with PTLD. Anti-AA2 antibodies were also assessed in a cross-sectional group of 281 patients with PTLD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Anti-AA2 antibodies were highest after antimicrobial therapy in both the EM RTH and PTLD cohorts. By 6 months, there was no difference between EM RTH and healthy controls. Anti-AA2 antibodies were higher in the cross-sectional PTLD group (79.69 <i>versus</i> 48.22 units, <i>p</i> < 0.0001), though with no difference in total symptom burden.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Anti-AA2 persists in PTLD, though did not identify a clinical phenotype.</p>","PeriodicalId":46154,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Infectious Disease","volume":"11 ","pages":"20499361241242971"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10981857/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Infectious Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20499361241242971","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Anti-annexin A2 (AA2) antibodies have been described in Lyme arthritis and erythema migrans, although they have not been described in post-treatment Lyme disease (PTLD).

Objectives: Determine whether anti-AA2 antibodies are present among patients with PTLD and determine the clinical relevance of these antibodies.

Design and methods: Anti-AA2 levels were tested serially in a longitudinal cohort of 44 patients with acute Lyme disease, 22 with a return to health (EM RTH), and 22 with PTLD. Anti-AA2 antibodies were also assessed in a cross-sectional group of 281 patients with PTLD.

Results: Anti-AA2 antibodies were highest after antimicrobial therapy in both the EM RTH and PTLD cohorts. By 6 months, there was no difference between EM RTH and healthy controls. Anti-AA2 antibodies were higher in the cross-sectional PTLD group (79.69 versus 48.22 units, p < 0.0001), though with no difference in total symptom burden.

Conclusion: Anti-AA2 persists in PTLD, though did not identify a clinical phenotype.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
治疗后莱姆病中的附录素 A2 抗体。
背景:抗附件素A2(AA2)抗体在莱姆关节炎和迁延性红斑中已有描述,但在治疗后莱姆病(PTLD)中还没有描述:确定PTLD患者中是否存在抗AA2抗体,并确定这些抗体的临床意义:设计:对44名急性莱姆病患者、22名恢复健康(EM RTH)患者和22名PTLD患者的抗AA2水平进行纵向队列连续检测。此外,还对281名PTLD患者的抗AA2抗体进行了横断面评估:结果:抗AA2抗体在EM RTH和PTLD患者抗菌治疗后最高。6个月后,EM RTH和健康对照组之间没有差异。PTLD横断面组的抗AA2抗体更高(79.69单位对48.22单位,P 结论:抗AA2抗体在PTLD中持续存在:抗AA2在PTLD中持续存在,但并未确定临床表型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
8.80%
发文量
64
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊最新文献
Social disparities on PrEP use and awareness among sexual and gender minorities using smartphones in India. Challenges in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis caused by L. braziliensis in four travelers: a case series. Fungal Infections, Treatment and Antifungal Resistance: The Sub-Saharan African Context. Polio: Background and perspective on how international travel can be made safe against polio. Emerging trends in fungal endocarditis: clinical complexity, diagnostic challenges, and therapeutic implications - a case series and literature review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1