On the accuracy of sequence methods for baroreflex sensitivity estimation.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-02 DOI:10.1007/s13246-023-01380-y
Hasana Bagnall-Hare, Violeta I McLoone, John V Ringwood
{"title":"On the accuracy of sequence methods for baroreflex sensitivity estimation.","authors":"Hasana Bagnall-Hare, Violeta I McLoone, John V Ringwood","doi":"10.1007/s13246-023-01380-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the absence of a true gold standard for non-invasive baroreflex sensitivity estimation, it is difficult to quantify the accuracy of the variety of techniques used. A popular family of methods, usually entitled 'sequence methods' involves the extraction of (apparently) correlated sequences from blood pressure and RR-interval data and the subsequent fitting of a regression line to the data. This paper discusses the accuracy of sequence methods from a system identification perspective, using both data generated from a known mathematical model and spontaneous baroreflex data. It is shown that sequence methods can introduce significant bias in the baroreflex sensitivity estimate, even when great care is taken in sequence selection.</p>","PeriodicalId":48490,"journal":{"name":"Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"503-516"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11166763/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-023-01380-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the absence of a true gold standard for non-invasive baroreflex sensitivity estimation, it is difficult to quantify the accuracy of the variety of techniques used. A popular family of methods, usually entitled 'sequence methods' involves the extraction of (apparently) correlated sequences from blood pressure and RR-interval data and the subsequent fitting of a regression line to the data. This paper discusses the accuracy of sequence methods from a system identification perspective, using both data generated from a known mathematical model and spontaneous baroreflex data. It is shown that sequence methods can introduce significant bias in the baroreflex sensitivity estimate, even when great care is taken in sequence selection.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
气压反射灵敏度估算序列方法的准确性。
由于缺乏真正的无创性巴反射灵敏度估算黄金标准,因此很难量化所使用的各种技术的准确性。一种流行的方法通常被称为 "序列方法",包括从血压和心率间隔数据中提取(明显)相关的序列,然后将回归线拟合到数据中。本文使用已知数学模型生成的数据和自发的气压反射数据,从系统识别的角度讨论了序列法的准确性。结果表明,即使在选择序列时非常谨慎,序列法也会在巴反射灵敏度估计值中引入显著偏差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
4.50%
发文量
110
期刊最新文献
An automated detection system of autism spectrum disorder using meta-heuristic approach of adaptive LSTM with bayesian learning technique. Classification of lung cancer tissue using bioimpedance spectroscopy and fractional-order circuit modeling. A new model based on multi-axis vision transformer for chondromalacia patella diagnosis in magnetic resonance scans. Evaluating dose distribution in prostate IMRT patients using deep learning: the influence of loss function on model performance. Dosimetric evaluation of gynecological HDR brachytherapy using an in-house phantom and RPLGDs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1