Observational evidence linking psychotropic medicines to the dispensing of opioid agents in later life.

Osvaldo P Almeida, Amy Page, Frank M Sanfilippo, David B Preen, Christopher Etherton-Beer
{"title":"Observational evidence linking psychotropic medicines to the dispensing of opioid agents in later life.","authors":"Osvaldo P Almeida, Amy Page, Frank M Sanfilippo, David B Preen, Christopher Etherton-Beer","doi":"10.1111/psyg.13123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of opioid medicines is common in developed countries, particularly among older adults and those with mental health disorders. It is unclear if the association between mental disorders and opioid medicines is causal, or is due to reverse causality or confounding.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a 10% random sample of the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (years 2012-2022) to examine the cross-sectional, case-control and longitudinal association between the dispensing of antidepressants, anxiolytics, hypnotics, antipsychotics and lithium, and opioid medicines. We used logistic regression, structural equation models (SEM), and Cox regression to analyze the data. Analyses were adjusted for age (years), sex, and number of non-psychotropic medicines dispensed during the year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 2022 file contained 804 334 individuals aged 50 years or over (53.1% women), of whom 181 690 (22.6%) received an opioid medicine. The adjusted odds ratio of being dispensed opioid medicines was 1.44 (99% CI = 1.42-1.46) for antidepressants, 1.97 (99% CI = 1.92-2.03) for anxiolytics, 1.55 (99% CI = 1.51-1.60) for hypnotics, 1.32 (99% CI = 1.27-1.38) for antipsychotics, and 0.60 (99% CI = 0.53-0.69) for lithium. Similar associations were noticed when we compared participants who were or not dispensed opioid medicines in 2022 for exposure to psychotropic agents between 2012 and 2021. SEM confirmed that this association was not due to reverse causality. The dispensing of antidepressants was associated with increased adjusted hazard (HR) of subsequent dispensing of opioid medicines (HR = 1.29, 99% CI = 1.27-1.30). Similar associations were observed for anxiolytics, hypnotics and antipsychotics, but not lithium.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The dispensing of opioid medicines is higher among older individuals exposed to antidepressants, anxiolytics, hypnotics and antipsychotics than those who are not. These associations are not due to reverse causality or study design. Preventive strategies seeking to minimise the risk of inappropriate use of opioid medicines in later life should consider targeting this high-risk population.</p>","PeriodicalId":74597,"journal":{"name":"Psychogeriatrics : the official journal of the Japanese Psychogeriatric Society","volume":" ","pages":"665-674"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11578014/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychogeriatrics : the official journal of the Japanese Psychogeriatric Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/psyg.13123","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The use of opioid medicines is common in developed countries, particularly among older adults and those with mental health disorders. It is unclear if the association between mental disorders and opioid medicines is causal, or is due to reverse causality or confounding.

Methods: We used a 10% random sample of the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (years 2012-2022) to examine the cross-sectional, case-control and longitudinal association between the dispensing of antidepressants, anxiolytics, hypnotics, antipsychotics and lithium, and opioid medicines. We used logistic regression, structural equation models (SEM), and Cox regression to analyze the data. Analyses were adjusted for age (years), sex, and number of non-psychotropic medicines dispensed during the year.

Results: The 2022 file contained 804 334 individuals aged 50 years or over (53.1% women), of whom 181 690 (22.6%) received an opioid medicine. The adjusted odds ratio of being dispensed opioid medicines was 1.44 (99% CI = 1.42-1.46) for antidepressants, 1.97 (99% CI = 1.92-2.03) for anxiolytics, 1.55 (99% CI = 1.51-1.60) for hypnotics, 1.32 (99% CI = 1.27-1.38) for antipsychotics, and 0.60 (99% CI = 0.53-0.69) for lithium. Similar associations were noticed when we compared participants who were or not dispensed opioid medicines in 2022 for exposure to psychotropic agents between 2012 and 2021. SEM confirmed that this association was not due to reverse causality. The dispensing of antidepressants was associated with increased adjusted hazard (HR) of subsequent dispensing of opioid medicines (HR = 1.29, 99% CI = 1.27-1.30). Similar associations were observed for anxiolytics, hypnotics and antipsychotics, but not lithium.

Conclusions: The dispensing of opioid medicines is higher among older individuals exposed to antidepressants, anxiolytics, hypnotics and antipsychotics than those who are not. These associations are not due to reverse causality or study design. Preventive strategies seeking to minimise the risk of inappropriate use of opioid medicines in later life should consider targeting this high-risk population.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有观察证据表明,精神药物与晚年阿片类药物的配药有关。
背景:在发达国家,阿片类药物的使用很普遍,尤其是在老年人和精神疾病患者中。目前尚不清楚精神障碍与阿片类药物之间的关联是因果关系,还是反向因果关系或混杂因素所致:我们使用澳大利亚药品福利计划(2012-2022 年)中 10% 的随机样本,研究了抗抑郁药、抗焦虑药、催眠药、抗精神病药和锂与阿片类药物之间的横截面、病例对照和纵向联系。我们采用逻辑回归、结构方程模型(SEM)和 Cox 回归分析数据。分析结果根据年龄(岁)、性别和当年配发的非精神药物数量进行了调整:2022 年的档案包含 804 334 名 50 岁或以上的患者(53.1% 为女性),其中 181 690 人(22.6%)接受了阿片类药物治疗。抗抑郁药、抗焦虑药、催眠药、抗精神病药和锂药的调整后几率分别为1.44(99% CI = 1.42-1.46)、1.97(99% CI = 1.92-2.03)、1.55(99% CI = 1.51-1.60)、1.32(99% CI = 1.27-1.38)和0.60(99% CI = 0.53-0.69)。当我们比较 2022 年获得或未获得阿片类药物的参与者在 2012 年至 2021 年期间的精神药物接触情况时,也发现了类似的关联。SEM 证实,这种关联不是由于反向因果关系造成的。配发抗抑郁药与随后配发阿片类药物的调整后危险度(HR)增加有关(HR = 1.29,99% CI = 1.27-1.30)。抗焦虑药、催眠药和抗精神病药也有类似的关联,但锂药没有:结论:与未使用抗抑郁药、抗焦虑药、催眠药和抗精神病药的老年人相比,使用阿片类药物的老年人比例更高。这些关联并不是由于反向因果关系或研究设计造成的。为尽量降低晚年不当使用阿片类药物的风险而采取的预防策略应考虑针对这一高风险人群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Relationship between apathy/post-stroke depression and gait training in patients with stroke. Expressed emotion mediates the association between caregiver relationship closeness and psychological symptoms in people with dementia. Factors associated with grief in family carers of people with dementia in Japan: a systematic review. Repercussions of abuse by caregivers in the elderly population with dementia: a scoping review. Psychosocial problems observed in older adults after disaster.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1