Assessment of Drying Protocol on the Bond Strength and Tag Penetration of Two Different Sealers to the Root Dentin: An In Vitro Study.

Mymensingh medical journal : MMJ Pub Date : 2024-04-01
N Khandwawala, V Hegde, A Morawala, S Srilatha
{"title":"Assessment of Drying Protocol on the Bond Strength and Tag Penetration of Two Different Sealers to the Root Dentin: An In Vitro Study.","authors":"N Khandwawala, V Hegde, A Morawala, S Srilatha","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Accomplishment of an ideal root canal treatment is attributed to various essential factors such as proper instrumentation, chemomechanical preparation, obturation and post endodontic restoration. The main aim of this study is to test the null hypothesis that is the moisture condition of root dentin would not affect the bond strength and sealer penetration. This is an in vitro study conducted in Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, M A Rangoonwala Dental College, Pune, India over a period of two years (from 2021 to 2023). One hundred and twenty single-rooted Premolars with fully formed apices and similar root morphology were obtained and stored in 0.1% thymol solution. The specimens were randomly assigned to 3 broad experimental groups (n=40) according to the drying protocol such as Group A- Paper points (P), Group B- diode laser (L) and Group C- isopropyl alcohol (A). For each drying protocol, the specimens were further assigned to 2 subgroups (n=20) with respect to the sealers used: AH Plus (AH) and Apexit Plus sealers (APx). The effect of drying protocol using paper points, isopropyl alcohol and diode-lasers on the bond strength and tag penetration of two different sealers to the root dentin was evaluated. Maximum overall push-out Bond strength was seen in group AH+L and least in group APx+ L. Inter-site push-out bond Strength was highest in the coronal third followed by the middle and least in the apical third of all the groups. Maximum over all depth of penetration was seen in group AH+L and minimum in group APx+L. AH plus sealer showed better bond strength, sealer penetration and adaptation to the dentinal walls compared to Apexit plus sealer, irrespective of the drying protocol followed. All the drying protocols used did not show statistically significant results in the apical thirds of root canals of all the groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":94148,"journal":{"name":"Mymensingh medical journal : MMJ","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mymensingh medical journal : MMJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accomplishment of an ideal root canal treatment is attributed to various essential factors such as proper instrumentation, chemomechanical preparation, obturation and post endodontic restoration. The main aim of this study is to test the null hypothesis that is the moisture condition of root dentin would not affect the bond strength and sealer penetration. This is an in vitro study conducted in Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, M A Rangoonwala Dental College, Pune, India over a period of two years (from 2021 to 2023). One hundred and twenty single-rooted Premolars with fully formed apices and similar root morphology were obtained and stored in 0.1% thymol solution. The specimens were randomly assigned to 3 broad experimental groups (n=40) according to the drying protocol such as Group A- Paper points (P), Group B- diode laser (L) and Group C- isopropyl alcohol (A). For each drying protocol, the specimens were further assigned to 2 subgroups (n=20) with respect to the sealers used: AH Plus (AH) and Apexit Plus sealers (APx). The effect of drying protocol using paper points, isopropyl alcohol and diode-lasers on the bond strength and tag penetration of two different sealers to the root dentin was evaluated. Maximum overall push-out Bond strength was seen in group AH+L and least in group APx+ L. Inter-site push-out bond Strength was highest in the coronal third followed by the middle and least in the apical third of all the groups. Maximum over all depth of penetration was seen in group AH+L and minimum in group APx+L. AH plus sealer showed better bond strength, sealer penetration and adaptation to the dentinal walls compared to Apexit plus sealer, irrespective of the drying protocol followed. All the drying protocols used did not show statistically significant results in the apical thirds of root canals of all the groups.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
干燥程序对两种不同封闭剂与牙根牙本质的粘结强度和标记穿透性的评估:体外研究
实现理想的根管治疗要归功于各种基本因素,如正确的器械操作、化学机械准备、封闭和根管治疗后修复。本研究的主要目的是检验根牙本质的湿度条件不会影响粘接强度和封闭剂渗透的零假设。这是一项体外研究,在印度浦那 M A Rangoonwala 牙科学院保守牙科和牙髓病学系进行,为期两年(从 2021 年到 2023 年)。获得120颗根尖完全形成、牙根形态相似的单根前臼齿,并将其保存在0.1%的百里酚溶液中。根据干燥方案,将标本随机分配到 3 个实验组(n=40),如 A 组-纸点(P)、B 组-二极管激光(L)和 C 组-异丙醇(A)。对于每种干燥方案,试样还根据所使用的封闭剂被分配到 2 个亚组(n=20):AH Plus(AH)和 Apexit Plus 密封剂(APx)。评估了使用纸点、异丙醇和二极管激光器的干燥方案对两种不同封闭剂与根部牙本质的粘接强度和标记渗透的影响。AH+L组的整体推出粘接强度最大,APx+L组最小。在所有组别中,冠状三分之一处的部位间推出粘接强度最大,其次是中部,根尖三分之一处最小。AH+L组的穿透深度最大,APx+L组最小。与 Apexit 加封闭剂相比,AH 加封闭剂显示出更好的粘结强度、封闭剂穿透性和对牙本质壁的适应性,无论采用哪种干燥方案。在所有组别的根管根尖三分之二处,所有使用的干燥方案均未显示出具有统计学意义的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Correlation of Stature with Great Toe Length in 5-10 Years Aged Bangladeshi Children. Demographic Characteristics, Clinical Profile, Outcome and Risk Factors of Covid-19 among Health Care Workers in a COVID Dedicated Hospital. Demographic Study of Epileptic Burn Patient in a Tertiary Level Hospital of Bangladesh. Distribution and Characteristics of Congenital Cardiac Surgery Centers within Bangladesh. Early Postoperative Outcome Following Laparoscopic Surgeries in Rectal Malignancies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1