Resolution of Respect: Conrad Alan Istock (1936–2023)

Steven Hecht Orzack, Julia Bell, Judith Bronstein, William Etges, Shripad Tuljapurkar
{"title":"Resolution of Respect: Conrad Alan Istock (1936–2023)","authors":"Steven Hecht Orzack,&nbsp;Julia Bell,&nbsp;Judith Bronstein,&nbsp;William Etges,&nbsp;Shripad Tuljapurkar","doi":"10.1002/bes2.2129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Conrad Istock was an important contributor to the emerging field of evolutionary ecology starting in the 1960s. His best-known work in this area blended theory and field and laboratory studies of pitcher-plant mosquitoes. Conrad died March 8, 2023, in Ithaca, New York, USA.</p><p>Conrad Alan Istock was born August 31, 1936, and grew up in Grosse Pointe Park, Michigan, USA, along with one sister and two brothers. During childhood, Conrad was shy, but he sang in the church choir along with his mother, took up playing the violin, which became a lifelong passion, and was an enthusiastic Boy Scout, eventually becoming an Eagle Scout. He loved the outdoors and his troop's camping trips further stimulated his lifelong fascination with nature.</p><p>Conrad matriculated at Wayne University (now Wayne State University) in Detroit in the fall of 1954. His circuitous path through college makes his career as a biologist seem far from inevitable. He first enrolled in the College of Engineering. In the winter of 1956, he transferred to the pre-education curriculum in the College of Liberal Arts and then in the winter of 1957 to the College of Education as a “science” major. He intended to be a high school teacher. It was not until the spring of 1956, his fourth semester in college, that he took “General Biology,” which was his first course in biology. He took one biology course in each of the following four semesters. As he entered his last year of college in the fall of 1958, only five of the forty-three courses he had taken were in biology. His last year was different, as six of his nine courses were biology. We describe below what sparked this change. In his last semester, he transferred back to the College of Liberal Arts and became a biology major. He graduated in June 1959 with a B.A.</p><p>Conrad's undergraduate years must have been especially stimulating for two reasons. The first is that the Biology Department at Wayne served students having a great diversity of educational goals. This is reflected in the courses it offered, which included Bacteriology, Comparative Anatomy, Endocrinology, Histology, Immunology, Invertebrate Zoology, and Ornithology, as well as courses such as Antiseptics and Disinfectants, Microbiology for Contract Nurses, Industrial Microbiology, and Scientific Aspects of Disease Control for students entering healthcare and public-health professions. The second reason is that the number of matriculated students increased from 11,293 in 1945–1946 to 26,556 in 1955–1956 (Hanawalt <span>1968</span>:360) and the operating budget increased from 4.3 million dollars in 1945–1946 to 16.5 million dollars in 1955–1956 (Hanawalt <span>1968</span>:370). Both increases must have contributed to a sense at Wayne of growth and of optimism about the future, which we believe inspired Conrad. Despite setbacks and disappointments (see below), this optimism never left him.</p><p><i>Inside</i> the classroom, Conrad received a broad education in biology. Several late 1950s, biology faculty were active researchers, including William Duellman (Mendelson <span>2022</span>) and especially Charles Creaser, who taught ichthyology at Wayne and at the University of Michigan Biological Station (UMBS) and who likely influenced Conrad to pursue graduate studies in biology at his alma mater, University of Michigan. Creaser published ecological, endocrinological, and natural historical studies mostly in ichthyology (e.g., Creaser <span>1929</span>, <span>1930</span>, Creaser and Gorbman <span>1939</span>) and was the first to describe the potential of zebrafish to be a model organism for studies of vertebrate development (Creaser <span>1934</span>, Varga <span>2016</span>). Creaser was an “inspiring teacher” (Gorbman <span>1965</span>); we suspect Conrad shared this opinion, as he had direct experience with Creaser as a teacher and he chose Creaser as his advisor when he became a biology major in 1959.</p><p><i>Outside</i> the classroom, Conrad must have received a broad education in the human experience. Many of his fellow students were children of factory workers as Detroit was then the center of the United States automobile industry, and likely, many were the first of their family to attend college. During and after World War II, the auto manufacturing plants and subsidiary plants supplying them attracted hundreds of thousands of workers from a wide variety of ethnic backgrounds, including many Black Americans who sought a better life then unavailable to them in the American South (Sugrue <span>2005</span>:19–31). In the 1950s, “Detroit the Dynamic” was still near its industrial zenith as the “arsenal of democracy” that arose from the enormous World War II demand for industrial goods (Sugrue <span>2005</span>). The city was a center for progressive politics and labor activism, which in part was manifested by substantial involvement in local and state politics by the American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations and especially the United Autoworkers Union (UAW; Greenstone <span>1977</span>:chapter 4). In 1949, the UAW had ~217,000 members in Detroit alone (Molyneux <span>2023</span>). The labor movement, left-wing politics, and the civil rights movement were “in the air” at Wayne and in Detroit. We believe this exposure deeply impressed Conrad and led to his substantial commitment to liberal politics and social justice described later.</p><p>Conrad's education at Wayne was complemented in the summer of 1958 by his enrollment at UMBS where he took the Ornithology course taught by Harrison Tordoff (Gill <span>2009</span>) and the Ichthyology course taught by Creaser. Both courses exposed Conrad to a forward-thinking researcher having a deep knowledge of natural history. We suspect this experience sparked his decision to become a biology major and eventually to become a biologist whose career embodied the combination of strengths he was exposed to by these two teachers.</p><p>In the fall of 1959, Conrad entered the PhD program in the Zoology Department at the University of Michigan. Faculty members in the department and in the Botany Department included Francis Evans, Nelson Hairston, Larry Slobodkin, Fred Smith, Theodore Hubbell, Frederick Sparrow, and others who were influential researchers in the 1960s and thereafter, especially in community and evolutionary ecology (Evans <span>2003</span>, Wilbur and Gill <span>2008</span>, Colwell and Futuyma <span>2011</span>, Paine <span>2013</span>). Conrad's educational focus was now biology (save for one physics course and two Russian courses). He received an A- or higher in 18 of the 22 biology courses he took. He honed his lifelong non-hierarchical engagement in scientific debate in a weekly ecology seminar presided over by Hairston, Slobodkin, and Smith. Recent articles as well as presentations of research by graduate students were discussed. A fellow graduate student, Bruce Levin, recalls that Conrad was an inspiration to him because he always got to the core of a contentious issue in a way that improved the debate (Levin <span>2023</span>).</p><p>Conrad's PhD thesis project was a study of the “Distribution, Coexistence and Competition of three whirligig beetle species of the genus <i>Dineutes</i> (Gyrinidate, Coleoptera).” His committee consisted of Slobodkin (chair), Hairston, Hubbell, and Sparrow. Conrad described the distributions of three species (<i>D. assimilis</i>, <i>D. horni</i>, and <i>D. nigrior</i>) from the bottom to the top of Michigan and hypothesized that they were governed by competition for food. The results of laboratory experiments in which species were reared together under food-limited conditions supported this hypothesis. This study was one of a few at the time that combined field and laboratory studies in an investigation of the causal basis of the structure of an ecological community. The resulting publication (Istock <span>1966</span>) was Conrad's first. He later described the competitive displacement of one species of whirligig beetle by another in one generation (Istock <span>1967<i>a</i></span>).</p><p>In 1960, Conrad met Nancy Smith (1935–2020) when both were enrolled in a Plant Ecology course at UMBS and they married in 1961. They and their daughters (Alice Istock Stone, 1964–2017, and Anne Istock Keys, 1966–) were at “Bug Camp” many summers, with Conrad either teaching courses such as evolutionary ecology, conducting research, or both. Conrad's last summer at UMBS was in 1987. This long association has been honored by an Istock Family Scholarship Fund, which gives financial aid to students attending UMBS (https://giving.umich.edu/um/w/istock-family-scholarship-731433).</p><p>After a one-year position at the University of Illinois, in 1965 Conrad joined the Department of Biology at the University of Rochester, New York. It is in Rochester that Conrad's professional life developed in two very different ways.</p><p>The first way was typical for any assistant professor. Conrad established a research career. His initial work was the description of the community dynamics of two corixid bug species (Istock <span>1973</span>). He later showed that the changes in numbers of the two species agreed well with Volterra's logistic model of interspecific competition (Istock <span>1977</span>).</p><p>Conrad then began his study of the evolutionary ecology of the pitcher-plant mosquito, <i>Wyeomyia smithii</i>. Conrad and collaborators first described how interactions between resource levels and intraspecific competition for resources affect development time and tendency to enter larval diapause in natural and laboratory populations (Istock et al. <span>1975</span>, <span>1976<i>a</i></span>, <span><i>b</i></span>, Moeur and Istock <span>1980</span>). They beautifully demonstrated how natural selection favors reduced larval diapause tendency during spring and summer, and then, favors increased diapause tendency later in the year because diapause allows the population to overwinter. The net consequence of these countervailing influences is the maintenance of heritable variation for a fitness trait. These studies and their theoretical interpretation were reviewed in Istock (<span>1978</span>, <span>1981</span>, <span>1982</span>, <span>1985</span>). Further laboratory studies examined genetic effects on life history characteristics in crosses between mosquitoes from populations from northern temperate and subtropical climates (Istock <span>1982</span>). In addition, Moeur and Istock (<span>1982</span>) described extensive chromosomal inversion polymorphism in a population and Istock and Weisburg (<span>1987</span>) described among-population polymorphism at two electrophoretic loci and suggested that the pattern of variation at each locus was governed by natural selection. Scheiner and Istock (<span>1991</span>) also conducted an artificial selection experiment to investigate how that the phenotypic correlation between development time and diapause tendency constrains the direction and magnitude of life history evolution in this species.</p><p>Conrad conducted other empirical work as well. He and collaborators analyzed the structure of forest moss communities (Coleman and Istock <span>1980</span>), developed a statistical tool to compare communities in mosaic landscapes and to detect patterns of change across an entire landscape (Istock and Scheiner <span>1987</span>, Scheiner and Istock <span>1987</span>), and analyzed changes in vascular plant communities in the hemlock–white pine–northern hardwood transition zone in Northern lower Michigan (Scheiner and Istock <span>1994</span>). He and collaborators also theoretically explored ecological dynamics (Streifer and Istock <span>1973</span>) and the interactions between ecological and evolutionary processes (Istock <span>1967<i>b</i></span>, <span>1970<i>a</i></span>, Tuljapurkar and Istock <span>1993</span>).</p><p>This must have been a bitter defeat. However, Conrad remained true to his progressive ideals, as we discuss later.</p><p>The dual nature of Conrad's professional life during the late 1960s to mid-1970s was remarkable and is even more so when viewed retrospectively. He received tenure as an associate professor in September 1968, and his research was funded by the National Science Foundation starting in 1967 and for many years thereafter. Yet, in his first 10 years at the University of Rochester (1965–1974), nine of his 16 publications concerned environmental and political issues unrelated to his research, such as the Vietnam War (Istock <span>1967<i>c</i></span>, <span>1971<i>a</i></span>), the environmental crisis (Istock <span>1969</span>, <span>1971<i>b</i></span>, <span><i>c</i></span>, <span><i>d</i></span>, <span><i>e</i></span>), and environmental policy and practices (Istock <span>1974</span>, Istock et al. <span>1974</span>).</p><p>In 1970, Conrad chaired the Black Studies Committee, which recommended that the university establish a “Center for Afro-American Studies” (Anonymous <span>1970<i>a</i></span>), and he also moderated a debate between William Buckley and Bill Kunstler on the “American Judicial System.” The Rochester newspaper described Buckley's position as “Repair It” and Kunstler's position as “Scrap It” and judged the event a “sometimes comic debate” (Anonymous <span>1970<i>b</i></span>). The article noted that the audience applauded Conrad's remark as moderator that “neither man seems to have suggested any workable change in the American judicial system.”</p><p>Conrad ended his speech with “My last question: what are you doing here, anyway?” The response of the students is unknown. The Rochester newspaper's article on the speech was entitled “Diplomas A Joke, says UR Prof” (Anonymous <span>1970<i>c</i></span>).</p><p>Conrad also engaged with the Rochester community. He contributed to a panel discussion of “overpopulation” at a meeting of Zero Population Growth (Anonymous <span>1970<i>d</i></span>), he opposed the building of an oil tank farm at the Port of Rochester and presciently noted that “It is impossible to continue expanding our consumption of foreign oil without causing greater economic and social turmoil in the world” (Anonymous <span>1973</span>), and he co-led a “lesson” in world hunger at a local high school, which involved a “26-hour fast to experience hunger first-hand” followed by a “meal-game” in which students each received a “first-, second-, or third-world meal” to break the fast. A reporter noted that “It wasn't clear what [the students] learned from the experience” (Gallagher <span>1975</span>).</p><p>Conrad's more direct involvement in political and social issues diminished in the later 1970s. He was a close friend of some of his colleagues, especially the behavioral ecologist Jerram Brown (Anonymous <span>2016</span>) and the geneticists Ernst Caspari (Eicher <span>1987</span>) and Uzi Nur (Normark and Ross <span>2010</span>). His research on <i>Wyeomyia</i> continued (see earlier). After the arrival in 1975 of graduate student Julia Bell Graham, his research included studies of the interaction between natural selection, recombination, and transformation in <i>Bacillus subtilis</i> (Graham and Istock <span>1978<i>a</i></span>, <span><i>b</i></span>, <span>1979</span>, <span>1981</span>). They demonstrated that strains could exchange genetic material via transformation when grown in soil microcosms. In initial experiments, a single recombinant came to dominate the populations. Further experiments with differentially marked isogenic strains showed that a recombinant strain does not always exhibit a growth advantage. The outcome of natural selection depends on environmental conditions and on the starting ratios of the parental strains.</p><p>In 1984, Conrad accepted the position of Chair of the EEB Department at the University of Arizona. He had no prior experience with an administrative task at this level. Conrad was a passionate advocate for the department and helped expand it, with 12 faculty members added between 1985 and 1991 when his chairmanship ended. These hires added evolution and genetics to the strengths of the department, alongside its strength in ecology.</p><p>Having left the Northeast, Conrad's work on pitcher-plant mosquitoes ended and he focused on bacteria. He and collaborators demonstrated that recombination was frequent within but not between clonal population structures of <i>B. subtilis</i> and of <i>B. licheniformis</i> strains from the Sonoran Desert (Istock et al. <span>1992</span>, Duncan et al. <span>1994</span>). Strains of <i>B. subtilis</i> and <i>B. licheniformis</i> were shown to exchange genetic material in soil culture. However, the interspecies hybrids were unable to persist, suggesting that in nature, the boundaries between these species are maintained (Duncan et al. <span>1989</span>). Istock et al. (<span>2001</span>) described deeply separated genomic lineages of <i>B. subtilis</i> from Africa, Asia, and North and South America, which are globally distributed and coexist in local populations. Some of these lineages are also further subdivided within local populations. These genomic divisions were unrelated to variation in several phenotypic traits. These findings raised still unresolved fundamental questions regarding the nature of bacterial species: Should the definition be phenotypic or genomic? If genomic, are the deep sublineages species? Conrad and collaborators grappled with these questions in a detailed analysis of bacterial species concepts (Istock et al. <span>1996</span>).</p><p>Conrad and collaborators also explored the interactions between lytic and temperate bacteriophage and <i>B. subtilis</i>, leading to the suggestion that the intertwined life histories of temperate phage and their hosts do not fit the ecological paradigms of parasite and host or of predator and prey (Pantastico-Caldas et al. <span>1992</span>). A second study relevant to bioremediation concerned a conjugative plasmid carrying genes encoding enzymes for naphthalene degradation and its host, <i>Pseudomonas putida</i> (Duncan et al. <span>1995</span>).</p><p>We see here Conrad's disappointment about what he viewed as the failure of reason and dialogue to achieve an outcome beneficial to all. This failure echoed his experiences decades previously in struggles over environmental, political, and social issues. The Mount Graham International Observatory now consists of three telescopes (https://mgio.arizona.edu/). The population of Mount Graham Red Squirrels is still “Endangered” according to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; its numbers fluctuated between two and three hundred for many years after the telescopes were installed. The population dropped after a 2017 wildfire and a 2022 survey estimated that there were 156 individuals (Frederico <span>2022</span>). The Mount Graham observatory controversy continues to attract attention (Helfrich <span>2019</span>).</p><p>Conrad's last research publications concerned geographic diversity of genetic variation in <i>B. subtilis</i> (Istock et al. <span>2001</span>), the description of a new species, <i>B. sonorensis</i> (Palmisano et al. <span>2001</span>), and the origin of life (Istock <span>2010</span>).</p><p>Conrad's third book is a collection of “Stories for Children of All Ages” (Istock <span>2016<i>b</i></span>) that embodies the same aspiration for courage and cooperation. It draws heavily on Conrad's knowledge of biology, with some stories involving real or imaginary animals, and on many parts of his personal life, such as his love for dogs (Boxers), playing the violin, and his love of family and of community.</p><p>It is sobering to realize that someone with Conrad's conception of a career as a biologist would never be hired at a research university in 2024. Grantsmanship, a publish-or-perish mentality, academic networking, and citation counts were foreign to him. Conrad had many faults and foibles. But his North Star was his passion for the pursuit of wisdom and for truth and justice. He shared this passion with each of us. We are all the better for it.</p><p>Ave Atque Vale</p>","PeriodicalId":93418,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America","volume":"105 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/bes2.2129","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bes2.2129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Conrad Istock was an important contributor to the emerging field of evolutionary ecology starting in the 1960s. His best-known work in this area blended theory and field and laboratory studies of pitcher-plant mosquitoes. Conrad died March 8, 2023, in Ithaca, New York, USA.

Conrad Alan Istock was born August 31, 1936, and grew up in Grosse Pointe Park, Michigan, USA, along with one sister and two brothers. During childhood, Conrad was shy, but he sang in the church choir along with his mother, took up playing the violin, which became a lifelong passion, and was an enthusiastic Boy Scout, eventually becoming an Eagle Scout. He loved the outdoors and his troop's camping trips further stimulated his lifelong fascination with nature.

Conrad matriculated at Wayne University (now Wayne State University) in Detroit in the fall of 1954. His circuitous path through college makes his career as a biologist seem far from inevitable. He first enrolled in the College of Engineering. In the winter of 1956, he transferred to the pre-education curriculum in the College of Liberal Arts and then in the winter of 1957 to the College of Education as a “science” major. He intended to be a high school teacher. It was not until the spring of 1956, his fourth semester in college, that he took “General Biology,” which was his first course in biology. He took one biology course in each of the following four semesters. As he entered his last year of college in the fall of 1958, only five of the forty-three courses he had taken were in biology. His last year was different, as six of his nine courses were biology. We describe below what sparked this change. In his last semester, he transferred back to the College of Liberal Arts and became a biology major. He graduated in June 1959 with a B.A.

Conrad's undergraduate years must have been especially stimulating for two reasons. The first is that the Biology Department at Wayne served students having a great diversity of educational goals. This is reflected in the courses it offered, which included Bacteriology, Comparative Anatomy, Endocrinology, Histology, Immunology, Invertebrate Zoology, and Ornithology, as well as courses such as Antiseptics and Disinfectants, Microbiology for Contract Nurses, Industrial Microbiology, and Scientific Aspects of Disease Control for students entering healthcare and public-health professions. The second reason is that the number of matriculated students increased from 11,293 in 1945–1946 to 26,556 in 1955–1956 (Hanawalt 1968:360) and the operating budget increased from 4.3 million dollars in 1945–1946 to 16.5 million dollars in 1955–1956 (Hanawalt 1968:370). Both increases must have contributed to a sense at Wayne of growth and of optimism about the future, which we believe inspired Conrad. Despite setbacks and disappointments (see below), this optimism never left him.

Inside the classroom, Conrad received a broad education in biology. Several late 1950s, biology faculty were active researchers, including William Duellman (Mendelson 2022) and especially Charles Creaser, who taught ichthyology at Wayne and at the University of Michigan Biological Station (UMBS) and who likely influenced Conrad to pursue graduate studies in biology at his alma mater, University of Michigan. Creaser published ecological, endocrinological, and natural historical studies mostly in ichthyology (e.g., Creaser 1929, 1930, Creaser and Gorbman 1939) and was the first to describe the potential of zebrafish to be a model organism for studies of vertebrate development (Creaser 1934, Varga 2016). Creaser was an “inspiring teacher” (Gorbman 1965); we suspect Conrad shared this opinion, as he had direct experience with Creaser as a teacher and he chose Creaser as his advisor when he became a biology major in 1959.

Outside the classroom, Conrad must have received a broad education in the human experience. Many of his fellow students were children of factory workers as Detroit was then the center of the United States automobile industry, and likely, many were the first of their family to attend college. During and after World War II, the auto manufacturing plants and subsidiary plants supplying them attracted hundreds of thousands of workers from a wide variety of ethnic backgrounds, including many Black Americans who sought a better life then unavailable to them in the American South (Sugrue 2005:19–31). In the 1950s, “Detroit the Dynamic” was still near its industrial zenith as the “arsenal of democracy” that arose from the enormous World War II demand for industrial goods (Sugrue 2005). The city was a center for progressive politics and labor activism, which in part was manifested by substantial involvement in local and state politics by the American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations and especially the United Autoworkers Union (UAW; Greenstone 1977:chapter 4). In 1949, the UAW had ~217,000 members in Detroit alone (Molyneux 2023). The labor movement, left-wing politics, and the civil rights movement were “in the air” at Wayne and in Detroit. We believe this exposure deeply impressed Conrad and led to his substantial commitment to liberal politics and social justice described later.

Conrad's education at Wayne was complemented in the summer of 1958 by his enrollment at UMBS where he took the Ornithology course taught by Harrison Tordoff (Gill 2009) and the Ichthyology course taught by Creaser. Both courses exposed Conrad to a forward-thinking researcher having a deep knowledge of natural history. We suspect this experience sparked his decision to become a biology major and eventually to become a biologist whose career embodied the combination of strengths he was exposed to by these two teachers.

In the fall of 1959, Conrad entered the PhD program in the Zoology Department at the University of Michigan. Faculty members in the department and in the Botany Department included Francis Evans, Nelson Hairston, Larry Slobodkin, Fred Smith, Theodore Hubbell, Frederick Sparrow, and others who were influential researchers in the 1960s and thereafter, especially in community and evolutionary ecology (Evans 2003, Wilbur and Gill 2008, Colwell and Futuyma 2011, Paine 2013). Conrad's educational focus was now biology (save for one physics course and two Russian courses). He received an A- or higher in 18 of the 22 biology courses he took. He honed his lifelong non-hierarchical engagement in scientific debate in a weekly ecology seminar presided over by Hairston, Slobodkin, and Smith. Recent articles as well as presentations of research by graduate students were discussed. A fellow graduate student, Bruce Levin, recalls that Conrad was an inspiration to him because he always got to the core of a contentious issue in a way that improved the debate (Levin 2023).

Conrad's PhD thesis project was a study of the “Distribution, Coexistence and Competition of three whirligig beetle species of the genus Dineutes (Gyrinidate, Coleoptera).” His committee consisted of Slobodkin (chair), Hairston, Hubbell, and Sparrow. Conrad described the distributions of three species (D. assimilis, D. horni, and D. nigrior) from the bottom to the top of Michigan and hypothesized that they were governed by competition for food. The results of laboratory experiments in which species were reared together under food-limited conditions supported this hypothesis. This study was one of a few at the time that combined field and laboratory studies in an investigation of the causal basis of the structure of an ecological community. The resulting publication (Istock 1966) was Conrad's first. He later described the competitive displacement of one species of whirligig beetle by another in one generation (Istock 1967a).

In 1960, Conrad met Nancy Smith (1935–2020) when both were enrolled in a Plant Ecology course at UMBS and they married in 1961. They and their daughters (Alice Istock Stone, 1964–2017, and Anne Istock Keys, 1966–) were at “Bug Camp” many summers, with Conrad either teaching courses such as evolutionary ecology, conducting research, or both. Conrad's last summer at UMBS was in 1987. This long association has been honored by an Istock Family Scholarship Fund, which gives financial aid to students attending UMBS (https://giving.umich.edu/um/w/istock-family-scholarship-731433).

After a one-year position at the University of Illinois, in 1965 Conrad joined the Department of Biology at the University of Rochester, New York. It is in Rochester that Conrad's professional life developed in two very different ways.

The first way was typical for any assistant professor. Conrad established a research career. His initial work was the description of the community dynamics of two corixid bug species (Istock 1973). He later showed that the changes in numbers of the two species agreed well with Volterra's logistic model of interspecific competition (Istock 1977).

Conrad then began his study of the evolutionary ecology of the pitcher-plant mosquito, Wyeomyia smithii. Conrad and collaborators first described how interactions between resource levels and intraspecific competition for resources affect development time and tendency to enter larval diapause in natural and laboratory populations (Istock et al. 1975, 1976a, b, Moeur and Istock 1980). They beautifully demonstrated how natural selection favors reduced larval diapause tendency during spring and summer, and then, favors increased diapause tendency later in the year because diapause allows the population to overwinter. The net consequence of these countervailing influences is the maintenance of heritable variation for a fitness trait. These studies and their theoretical interpretation were reviewed in Istock (1978, 1981, 1982, 1985). Further laboratory studies examined genetic effects on life history characteristics in crosses between mosquitoes from populations from northern temperate and subtropical climates (Istock 1982). In addition, Moeur and Istock (1982) described extensive chromosomal inversion polymorphism in a population and Istock and Weisburg (1987) described among-population polymorphism at two electrophoretic loci and suggested that the pattern of variation at each locus was governed by natural selection. Scheiner and Istock (1991) also conducted an artificial selection experiment to investigate how that the phenotypic correlation between development time and diapause tendency constrains the direction and magnitude of life history evolution in this species.

Conrad conducted other empirical work as well. He and collaborators analyzed the structure of forest moss communities (Coleman and Istock 1980), developed a statistical tool to compare communities in mosaic landscapes and to detect patterns of change across an entire landscape (Istock and Scheiner 1987, Scheiner and Istock 1987), and analyzed changes in vascular plant communities in the hemlock–white pine–northern hardwood transition zone in Northern lower Michigan (Scheiner and Istock 1994). He and collaborators also theoretically explored ecological dynamics (Streifer and Istock 1973) and the interactions between ecological and evolutionary processes (Istock 1967b, 1970a, Tuljapurkar and Istock 1993).

This must have been a bitter defeat. However, Conrad remained true to his progressive ideals, as we discuss later.

The dual nature of Conrad's professional life during the late 1960s to mid-1970s was remarkable and is even more so when viewed retrospectively. He received tenure as an associate professor in September 1968, and his research was funded by the National Science Foundation starting in 1967 and for many years thereafter. Yet, in his first 10 years at the University of Rochester (1965–1974), nine of his 16 publications concerned environmental and political issues unrelated to his research, such as the Vietnam War (Istock 1967c, 1971a), the environmental crisis (Istock 1969, 1971b, c, d, e), and environmental policy and practices (Istock 1974, Istock et al. 1974).

In 1970, Conrad chaired the Black Studies Committee, which recommended that the university establish a “Center for Afro-American Studies” (Anonymous 1970a), and he also moderated a debate between William Buckley and Bill Kunstler on the “American Judicial System.” The Rochester newspaper described Buckley's position as “Repair It” and Kunstler's position as “Scrap It” and judged the event a “sometimes comic debate” (Anonymous 1970b). The article noted that the audience applauded Conrad's remark as moderator that “neither man seems to have suggested any workable change in the American judicial system.”

Conrad ended his speech with “My last question: what are you doing here, anyway?” The response of the students is unknown. The Rochester newspaper's article on the speech was entitled “Diplomas A Joke, says UR Prof” (Anonymous 1970c).

Conrad also engaged with the Rochester community. He contributed to a panel discussion of “overpopulation” at a meeting of Zero Population Growth (Anonymous 1970d), he opposed the building of an oil tank farm at the Port of Rochester and presciently noted that “It is impossible to continue expanding our consumption of foreign oil without causing greater economic and social turmoil in the world” (Anonymous 1973), and he co-led a “lesson” in world hunger at a local high school, which involved a “26-hour fast to experience hunger first-hand” followed by a “meal-game” in which students each received a “first-, second-, or third-world meal” to break the fast. A reporter noted that “It wasn't clear what [the students] learned from the experience” (Gallagher 1975).

Conrad's more direct involvement in political and social issues diminished in the later 1970s. He was a close friend of some of his colleagues, especially the behavioral ecologist Jerram Brown (Anonymous 2016) and the geneticists Ernst Caspari (Eicher 1987) and Uzi Nur (Normark and Ross 2010). His research on Wyeomyia continued (see earlier). After the arrival in 1975 of graduate student Julia Bell Graham, his research included studies of the interaction between natural selection, recombination, and transformation in Bacillus subtilis (Graham and Istock 1978a, b, 1979, 1981). They demonstrated that strains could exchange genetic material via transformation when grown in soil microcosms. In initial experiments, a single recombinant came to dominate the populations. Further experiments with differentially marked isogenic strains showed that a recombinant strain does not always exhibit a growth advantage. The outcome of natural selection depends on environmental conditions and on the starting ratios of the parental strains.

In 1984, Conrad accepted the position of Chair of the EEB Department at the University of Arizona. He had no prior experience with an administrative task at this level. Conrad was a passionate advocate for the department and helped expand it, with 12 faculty members added between 1985 and 1991 when his chairmanship ended. These hires added evolution and genetics to the strengths of the department, alongside its strength in ecology.

Having left the Northeast, Conrad's work on pitcher-plant mosquitoes ended and he focused on bacteria. He and collaborators demonstrated that recombination was frequent within but not between clonal population structures of B. subtilis and of B. licheniformis strains from the Sonoran Desert (Istock et al. 1992, Duncan et al. 1994). Strains of B. subtilis and B. licheniformis were shown to exchange genetic material in soil culture. However, the interspecies hybrids were unable to persist, suggesting that in nature, the boundaries between these species are maintained (Duncan et al. 1989). Istock et al. (2001) described deeply separated genomic lineages of B. subtilis from Africa, Asia, and North and South America, which are globally distributed and coexist in local populations. Some of these lineages are also further subdivided within local populations. These genomic divisions were unrelated to variation in several phenotypic traits. These findings raised still unresolved fundamental questions regarding the nature of bacterial species: Should the definition be phenotypic or genomic? If genomic, are the deep sublineages species? Conrad and collaborators grappled with these questions in a detailed analysis of bacterial species concepts (Istock et al. 1996).

Conrad and collaborators also explored the interactions between lytic and temperate bacteriophage and B. subtilis, leading to the suggestion that the intertwined life histories of temperate phage and their hosts do not fit the ecological paradigms of parasite and host or of predator and prey (Pantastico-Caldas et al. 1992). A second study relevant to bioremediation concerned a conjugative plasmid carrying genes encoding enzymes for naphthalene degradation and its host, Pseudomonas putida (Duncan et al. 1995).

We see here Conrad's disappointment about what he viewed as the failure of reason and dialogue to achieve an outcome beneficial to all. This failure echoed his experiences decades previously in struggles over environmental, political, and social issues. The Mount Graham International Observatory now consists of three telescopes (https://mgio.arizona.edu/). The population of Mount Graham Red Squirrels is still “Endangered” according to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; its numbers fluctuated between two and three hundred for many years after the telescopes were installed. The population dropped after a 2017 wildfire and a 2022 survey estimated that there were 156 individuals (Frederico 2022). The Mount Graham observatory controversy continues to attract attention (Helfrich 2019).

Conrad's last research publications concerned geographic diversity of genetic variation in B. subtilis (Istock et al. 2001), the description of a new species, B. sonorensis (Palmisano et al. 2001), and the origin of life (Istock 2010).

Conrad's third book is a collection of “Stories for Children of All Ages” (Istock 2016b) that embodies the same aspiration for courage and cooperation. It draws heavily on Conrad's knowledge of biology, with some stories involving real or imaginary animals, and on many parts of his personal life, such as his love for dogs (Boxers), playing the violin, and his love of family and of community.

It is sobering to realize that someone with Conrad's conception of a career as a biologist would never be hired at a research university in 2024. Grantsmanship, a publish-or-perish mentality, academic networking, and citation counts were foreign to him. Conrad had many faults and foibles. But his North Star was his passion for the pursuit of wisdom and for truth and justice. He shared this passion with each of us. We are all the better for it.

Ave Atque Vale

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
致敬决议康拉德-艾伦-伊斯托克(1936-2023)
康拉德-伊斯托克是 20 世纪 60 年代新兴的进化生态学领域的重要贡献者。他在这一领域最著名的工作是将理论与对投植物蚊子的野外和实验室研究相结合。康拉德-艾伦-伊斯托克出生于 1936 年 8 月 31 日,在美国密歇根州格罗斯波因特公园长大,有一个姐姐和两个弟弟。童年时,康拉德很害羞,但他和母亲一起在教堂唱诗班唱歌,还学会了拉小提琴,这成为他毕生的爱好,他还是一名热心的童子军,最终成为一名鹰级童子军。1954 年秋,康拉德进入底特律韦恩大学(现韦恩州立大学)就读。他的大学之路迂回曲折,因此他的生物学家生涯似乎并非不可避免。他先是进入工程学院学习。1956 年冬,他转入文学院的教育预科班,1957 年冬转入教育学院的 "理科 "专业。他打算成为一名高中教师。直到 1956 年春季,即大学第四学期,他才选修了 "普通生物学",这是他的第一门生物学课程。之后的四个学期,他每个学期都选修了一门生物课。1958 年秋季,他进入大学的最后一年,在他选修的 43 门课程中,只有 5 门是生物课。而最后一年则不同,他的九门课程中有六门是生物课。我们将在下文中介绍引发这一变化的原因。在最后一个学期,他转回文学院,成为一名生物专业学生。1959 年 6 月,康拉德本科毕业,获得文学学士学位。首先,韦恩大学生物系的学生有各种各样的教育目标。这体现在其开设的课程中,包括细菌学、比较解剖学、内分泌学、组织学、免疫学、无脊椎动物学和鸟类学,以及为进入医疗保健和公共卫生专业的学生开设的防腐剂和消毒剂、合同护士微生物学、工业微生物学和疾病控制的科学方面等课程。第二个原因是注册学生人数从 1945-1946 年的 11,293 人增加到 1955-1956 年的 26,556 人(Hanawalt 1968:360),运营预算从 1945-1946 年的 430 万美元增加到 1955-1956 年的 1,650 万美元(Hanawalt 1968:370)。这两方面的增长肯定促进了韦恩的发展和对未来的乐观,我们相信这也激励了康拉德。尽管经历了挫折和失望(见下文),但这种乐观精神从未离开过他。在课堂上,康拉德接受了广泛的生物学教育。20 世纪 50 年代后期,生物系的几位教师都是活跃的研究人员,其中包括威廉-杜尔曼(William Duellman,2022 年出生于门德尔松),尤其是查尔斯-克雷泽(Charles Creaser),他曾在韦恩大学和密歇根大学生物站(UMBS)教授鱼类学,他很可能影响了康拉德在母校密歇根大学攻读生物学研究生。Creaser 主要发表了鱼类学方面的生态学、内分泌学和自然历史研究论文(例如,Creaser 1929 年、1930 年,Creaser 和 Gorbman 1939 年),并率先描述了斑马鱼作为脊椎动物发育研究模式生物的潜力(Creaser 1934 年,Varga 2016 年)。克雷泽是一位 "鼓舞人心的老师"(戈尔曼,1965 年);我们猜测康拉德也有同感,因为他曾与克雷泽有过直接的师生经历,而且在 1959 年主修生物学时,他选择了克雷泽作为自己的导师。他的许多同学都是工厂工人的子女,因为底特律当时是美国汽车工业的中心,许多人可能是他们家族中第一个上大学的人。二战期间和战后,汽车制造厂和为其供货的附属工厂吸引了成千上万来自不同种族背景的工人,其中包括许多美国黑人,他们寻求在美国南方无法获得的更好生活(Sugrue 2005:19-31)。20 世纪 50 年代,"充满活力的底特律 "作为第二次世界大战对工业产品的巨大需求催生的 "民主兵工厂",其工业发展仍接近顶峰(Sugrue 2005)。这座城市是进步政治和劳工活动的中心,部分表现为美国劳工联合会和工业组织大会,尤其是汽车工人联合工会(UAW;Greenstone 1977:第 4 章)对地方和州政治的大量参与。1949 年,UAW 仅在底特律就有约 217,000 名会员(Molyneux 2023)。 在韦恩和底特律,劳工运动、左翼政治和民权运动 "风起云涌"。我们相信,这种接触给康拉德留下了深刻印象,并促成了他后来对自由主义政治和社会正义的实质性承诺。1958 年夏天,康拉德进入加州大学伯克利分校学习,在那里他选修了哈里森-托尔多夫(Harrison Tordoff)教授的鸟类学课程(吉尔,2009 年)和克里瑟教授的鱼类学课程,从而补充了他在韦恩大学接受的教育。这两门课程让康拉德接触到了一位具有前瞻性思维、对自然史有深入了解的研究人员。我们猜想,这段经历促使他决定主修生物学,并最终成为一名生物学家,他的职业生涯体现了这两位老师所给予他的综合优势。1959 年秋天,康拉德进入密歇根大学动物学系攻读博士学位。该系和植物学系的教师包括弗朗西斯-埃文斯(Francis Evans)、纳尔逊-海尔斯顿(Nelson Hairston)、拉里-斯洛博金(Larry Slobodkin)、弗雷德-史密斯(Fred Smith)、西奥多-哈贝尔(Theodore Hubbell)、弗雷德里克-斯帕罗(Frederick Sparrow)等人,他们都是 20 世纪 60 年代及以后颇具影响力的研究人员,尤其是在群落生态学和进化生态学方面(埃文斯,2003 年;威尔伯和吉尔,2008 年;科尔韦尔和富图伊玛,2011 年;培恩,2013 年)。康拉德现在的教育重点是生物学(一门物理课和两门俄语课除外)。在他选修的 22 门生物课程中,有 18 门获得了 A 级或以上的成绩。在由海尔斯顿、斯洛博德金和史密斯主持的每周一次的生态学研讨会上,他磨练了自己终身参与科学辩论的非等级观念。会上讨论了最近发表的文章以及研究生的研究报告。研究生同学布鲁斯-莱文(Bruce Levin)回忆说,康拉德是他的灵感源泉,因为他总能以改善辩论的方式抓住有争议问题的核心(莱文,2023 年)。康拉德的博士论文项目是研究 "Dineutes 属(鞘翅目,Gyrinidate)三种旋甲虫的分布、共存和竞争"。他的委员会成员包括斯洛博德金(主席)、海尔斯顿、哈贝尔和斯帕罗。康拉德描述了三个物种(D. assimilis、D. horni 和 D. nigrior)从密歇根底部到顶部的分布情况,并假设它们受食物竞争的支配。在食物有限的条件下共同饲养物种的实验室实验结果支持了这一假设。这项研究是当时为数不多的将野外研究和实验室研究结合起来,对生态群落结构的因果基础进行调查的研究之一。康拉德首次发表了这一研究成果(Istock,1966 年)。后来,他描述了一种旋毛虫在一代中被另一种旋毛虫竞争性取代的情况(伊斯托克,1967a)。1960 年,康拉德遇到了南希-史密斯(Nancy Smith,1935-2020 年),当时两人都在加州大学伯克利分校学习植物生态学课程,两人于 1961 年结婚。他们和他们的女儿(爱丽丝-伊斯托克-斯通,1964-2017 年;安妮-伊斯托克-凯斯,1966-)在 "虫虫夏令营 "度过了许多个夏天,康拉德或教授进化生态学等课程,或从事研究工作,或两者兼而有之。康拉德在 UMBS 的最后一个夏天是 1987 年。伊斯托克家族奖学基金(Istock Family Scholarship Fund)为伊利诺伊大学的学生提供资助(https://giving.umich.edu/um/w/istock-family-scholarship-731433)。在伊利诺伊大学工作一年后,康拉德于 1965 年加入纽约罗切斯特大学生物系。在罗切斯特,康拉德的职业生涯以两种截然不同的方式发展。康拉德开始了研究生涯。他最初的工作是描述两种珊瑚虫的群落动态(伊斯托克,1973 年)。后来,他发现这两个物种的数量变化与沃尔泰拉的种间竞争逻辑模型非常吻合(伊斯托克,1977 年)。随后,康拉德开始了对投壶草蚊(Wyeomyia smithii)的进化生态学研究。康拉德及其合作者首先描述了资源水平和种内资源竞争之间的相互作用如何影响自然种群和实验室种群的发育时间以及幼虫进入休眠期的趋势(伊斯托克等人,1975 年、1976 年 a、b;莫尔和伊斯托克,1980 年)。他们很好地证明了自然选择如何在春夏两季有利于降低幼虫休眠趋势,而在下半年则有利于增加休眠趋势,因为休眠可使种群越冬。这些相互抵消的影响的净结果是维持了某一适生性状的遗传变异。伊斯托克(1978、1981、1982、1985 年)对这些研究及其理论解释进行了综述。进一步的实验室研究考察了北温带和亚热带气候蚊子种群杂交对生活史特征的遗传影响(Istock,1982 年)。 此外,Moeur 和 Istock(1982 年)描述了一个种群中广泛的染色体倒位多态性,Istock 和 Weisburg(1987 年)描述了两个电泳位点的种群间多态性,并认为每个位点的变异模式受自然选择的支配。Scheiner 和 Istock(1991 年)还进行了一次人工选择实验,研究发育时间与停顿倾向之间的表型相关性如何制约该物种生活史进化的方向和幅度。他和合作者分析了森林苔藓群落的结构(科尔曼和伊斯托克,1980 年),开发了一种统计工具来比较镶嵌景观中的群落并检测整个景观的变化模式(伊斯托克和谢纳,1987 年;谢纳和伊斯托克,1987 年),并分析了密歇根州北部下部铁杉-白松-北部硬木过渡带维管植物群落的变化(谢纳和伊斯托克,1994 年)。他和合作者还从理论上探讨了生态动力学(Streifer 和 Istock,1973 年)以及生态和进化过程之间的相互作用(Istock,1967 年 b;1970 年 a;Tuljapurkar 和 Istock,1993 年)。然而,康拉德仍然坚持他的进步理想,这一点我们将在下文讨论。康拉德在 20 世纪 60 年代末到 70 年代中期的职业生涯具有双重性质,这一点非常引人注目,回过头来看更是如此。1968 年 9 月,他获得了副教授终身职位,从 1967 年开始,他的研究工作一直得到美国国家科学基金会的资助。然而,在罗切斯特大学工作的头十年(1965-1974 年),他发表的 16 篇文章中有 9 篇涉及与其研究无关的环境和政治问题,如越南战争(伊斯托克,1967c, 1971a)、环境危机(伊斯托克,1969, 1971b, c, d, e)以及环境政策和实践(伊斯托克,1974 年;伊斯托克等,1974 年)。1970 年,康拉德担任黑人研究委员会主席,该委员会建议大学成立 "非裔美国人研究中心"(无名氏,1970a),他还主持了威廉-巴克利(William Buckley)和比尔-昆斯特勒(Bill Kunstler)关于 "美国司法体系 "的辩论。罗切斯特报》将巴克利的立场描述为 "修复它",而将昆斯特勒的立场描述为 "废掉它",并认为这是一场 "有时很滑稽的辩论"(佚名,1970 年 b)。文章指出,康拉德作为主持人说:"两个人似乎都没有对美国的司法系统提出任何可行的改革建议。"康拉德以 "我的最后一个问题:你们到底在这里做什么?"结束了他的演讲。学生们的回答不得而知。罗切斯特报纸关于这次演讲的文章题为 "罗切斯特大学教授说,文凭是个笑话"(佚名 1970c)。他在 "人口零增长"(Zero Population Growth)组织的一次会议上参与了关于 "人口过剩 "的小组讨论(佚名,1970d),他反对在罗切斯特港修建油库,并有先见之明地指出:"继续扩大我们对外国石油的消费,不可能不给世界带来更大的经济和社会动荡"(佚名,1973 年)、他还在当地一所高中共同主持了一堂关于世界饥饿问题的 "课",其中包括 "禁食 26 小时,亲身体验饥饿",然后进行 "用餐游戏",让学生们每人吃一顿 "第一、第二或第三世界的饭菜",以打破禁食状态。一位记者指出,"不清楚(学生们)从这次经历中学到了什么"(加拉格尔,1975 年)。70 年代后期,康拉德对政治和社会问题的直接参与有所减少。他是一些同事的密友,尤其是行为生态学家杰拉姆-布朗(Jerram Brown,2016 年,匿名)以及遗传学家恩斯特-卡斯帕里(Ernst Caspari,1987 年,艾歇尔)和乌兹-努尔(Uzi Nur,2010 年,诺马克和罗斯)。他对 Wyeomyia 的研究仍在继续(见前文)。1975 年,研究生朱莉娅-贝尔-格雷厄姆(Julia Bell Graham)到校后,他的研究包括枯草杆菌中自然选择、重组和转化之间相互作用的研究(格雷厄姆和伊斯托克,1978a、b、1979、1981 年)。他们证明,菌株在土壤微生态系统中生长时,可以通过转化交换遗传物质。在最初的实验中,单一的重组菌在种群中占主导地位。用不同标记的同源菌株进行的进一步实验表明,重组菌株并不总是表现出生长优势。自然选择的结果取决于环境条件和亲本菌株的起始比例。1984 年,康拉德接受了亚利桑那大学 EEB 系主任的职位。在此之前,他从未有过担任这一级别行政职务的经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Cover From Prototype to Reality: Moving Beyond the Technology Hype in Ecological Research Urban Scavengers: Human Activities Underpin Sandy Beach Scavenging Dynamics Review of COS 173-Education Research and Assessment: Pathways for Engaging Students in Socioecological Systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1