Distant suffering and digital knowledge politics: New trajectories for critical geography

IF 3.1 1区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY Geography Compass Pub Date : 2024-04-02 DOI:10.1111/gec3.12740
Natasha Keenaghan, Kathy Reilly
{"title":"Distant suffering and digital knowledge politics: New trajectories for critical geography","authors":"Natasha Keenaghan,&nbsp;Kathy Reilly","doi":"10.1111/gec3.12740","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper engages theoretical principles from critical human geography, media and communication studies, and development literature to present a research trajectory that unpacks the influence of digital platforms in representing and mediating distant suffering. Critiques of aid and development communication have long focused on concerns around the representation of the Global South as an ‘Othered’ space; powerful and deeply problematic geographical imaginaries become embedded within contemporary dominant discourses of aid and development. As significant sources of aid and development imaginaries, how civil society has mediated distant suffering has been subject to much critique. However, the rapid transition towards engagement with digital platforms necessitates an extension of critical considerations about representation and mediation. For example: what impact do digital platforms, their knowledge politics and representational capabilities have on imaginaries of distant suffering? Digital platforms (such as websites and other social media platforms) are situated within and constituted by (and through) a ‘digital knowledge politics’. These platforms and their mediations still exist within broader social practices and processes, and therefore remain entrenched within the power relations between Global North and Global South. This poses significant questions regarding the role digital platforms (and their representational capabilities) play in producing and mediating representations of distant strangers and their places. Moreover, further gaps within existing research emerge regarding how digital platforms can inform how (and indeed if) the public respond to such discourses. Through identifying key interdisciplinary intersections between critical human geographies and media and communication studies, this paper considers research trajectories that extend critical examinations of the role that digital platforms play in producing and representing aid and development imaginaries.</p>","PeriodicalId":51411,"journal":{"name":"Geography Compass","volume":"18 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gec3.12740","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geography Compass","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gec3.12740","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper engages theoretical principles from critical human geography, media and communication studies, and development literature to present a research trajectory that unpacks the influence of digital platforms in representing and mediating distant suffering. Critiques of aid and development communication have long focused on concerns around the representation of the Global South as an ‘Othered’ space; powerful and deeply problematic geographical imaginaries become embedded within contemporary dominant discourses of aid and development. As significant sources of aid and development imaginaries, how civil society has mediated distant suffering has been subject to much critique. However, the rapid transition towards engagement with digital platforms necessitates an extension of critical considerations about representation and mediation. For example: what impact do digital platforms, their knowledge politics and representational capabilities have on imaginaries of distant suffering? Digital platforms (such as websites and other social media platforms) are situated within and constituted by (and through) a ‘digital knowledge politics’. These platforms and their mediations still exist within broader social practices and processes, and therefore remain entrenched within the power relations between Global North and Global South. This poses significant questions regarding the role digital platforms (and their representational capabilities) play in producing and mediating representations of distant strangers and their places. Moreover, further gaps within existing research emerge regarding how digital platforms can inform how (and indeed if) the public respond to such discourses. Through identifying key interdisciplinary intersections between critical human geographies and media and communication studies, this paper considers research trajectories that extend critical examinations of the role that digital platforms play in producing and representing aid and development imaginaries.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
遥远的苦难与数字知识政治:批判地理学的新轨迹
本文结合批判性人文地理学、媒体与传播研究以及发展文献的理论原则,提出了一条研究轨迹,解读数字平台在表现和调解遥远苦难方面的影响。长期以来,对援助与发展传播的批判主要集中在对全球南部作为 "他者 "空间的表述上;强大而又深藏问题的地理想象被嵌入了当代主流的援助与发展话语中。作为援助和发展想象力的重要来源,民间社会如何对遥远的苦难进行调解一直备受批评。然而,随着数字平台的快速发展,我们有必要扩展对代表性和中介性的批判性思考。例如:数字平台、其知识政治和表征能力对遥远苦难的想象有什么影响?数字平台(如网站和其他社交媒体平台)位于 "数字知识政治 "之中,并由 "数字知识政治"(和通过 "数字知识政治")构成。这些平台及其媒介仍然存在于更广泛的社会实践和进程之中,因此仍然根植于全球北方和全球南方之间的权力关系之中。这就对数字平台(及其表征能力)在生产和中介遥远的陌生人及其所在地的表征方面所扮演的角色提出了重大问题。此外,现有研究在数字平台如何告知公众如何(以及是否)回应此类话语方面出现了更多空白。通过确定批判性人文地理学与媒体和传播研究之间的关键跨学科交叉点,本文探讨了扩展批判性研究的研究轨迹,以探讨数字平台在生产和表述援助与发展想象中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Geography Compass
Geography Compass GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
6.50%
发文量
61
期刊介绍: Unique in its range, Geography Compass is an online-only journal publishing original, peer-reviewed surveys of current research from across the entire discipline. Geography Compass publishes state-of-the-art reviews, supported by a comprehensive bibliography and accessible to an international readership. Geography Compass is aimed at senior undergraduates, postgraduates and academics, and will provide a unique reference tool for researching essays, preparing lectures, writing a research proposal, or just keeping up with new developments in a specific area of interest.
期刊最新文献
Historical Geographies of Engineering: Knowledges, Practices, Identities Big Data (R)evolution in Geography: Complexity Modelling in the Last Two Decades The Legal Geographies of Contracts: A Method on Formation, Substance and Enforcement Disrupting the Chrononormativity of Geographies of Youth and Youth Studies: Learning From Infractions at the Border Defining Climate Finance Justice: Critical Geographies of Justice Amid Financialized Climate Action
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1