Behind the Scenes: Radiotherapy technical training through professionals' eyes

M. Strasser , M.H. Senger
{"title":"Behind the Scenes: Radiotherapy technical training through professionals' eyes","authors":"M. Strasser ,&nbsp;M.H. Senger","doi":"10.1016/j.tipsro.2024.100247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Training technical professionals for Radiotherapy is essential due to growing demand caused by early cancer diagnoses, global population aging, rising cancer rates, and evolving equipment and techniques. Our objective was to gather insights from graduates of various courses who are now working professionally, based on the principle that one way to assess educational training is by considering the attributes that trained and active professionals deem important in the improvement courses they have taken.</p><p>A cross-sectional study (approved at the local Research Ethics Committee) was conducted, involving an online survey for the opinion of professionals already qualified as radiotherapy technicians or technologists and engaged in this work. The questionnaire consisted of 12 objective multiple-choice questions and four open-ended questions.</p><p>Of the 59 received responses, 49 professionals completed some course. Thirty-one (64.6%) pursued improvement/enhancement, followed by specialization (15; 31.2%) and extension (two; 4.2%). Thirty-four (69.4%) respondents had not engaged in any practical activities during their training. As for course weaknesses, respondents cited: inflexible schedule (29; 59.2%), distance from residence (12; 24.5%), low hourly load (four; 8.2%), and other issues (four; 8.2%).</p><p>The data underscores the need to adjust technical training in Radiotherapy, emphasizing the importance of a recognized professional team, practical learning, flexible schedules, and financial viability.</p><p>The strategic perspective of radiotherapy technicians currently working in this job market, emphasized the need for an adjustment in the offering of courses. These insights provide more well-structured foundations for contemporary teaching and learning processes, considering current societal characteristics, technological advances, and future student demands.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36328,"journal":{"name":"Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405632424000143/pdfft?md5=ba19eb2af241669af63d54c4eaebbe11&pid=1-s2.0-S2405632424000143-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405632424000143","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Training technical professionals for Radiotherapy is essential due to growing demand caused by early cancer diagnoses, global population aging, rising cancer rates, and evolving equipment and techniques. Our objective was to gather insights from graduates of various courses who are now working professionally, based on the principle that one way to assess educational training is by considering the attributes that trained and active professionals deem important in the improvement courses they have taken.

A cross-sectional study (approved at the local Research Ethics Committee) was conducted, involving an online survey for the opinion of professionals already qualified as radiotherapy technicians or technologists and engaged in this work. The questionnaire consisted of 12 objective multiple-choice questions and four open-ended questions.

Of the 59 received responses, 49 professionals completed some course. Thirty-one (64.6%) pursued improvement/enhancement, followed by specialization (15; 31.2%) and extension (two; 4.2%). Thirty-four (69.4%) respondents had not engaged in any practical activities during their training. As for course weaknesses, respondents cited: inflexible schedule (29; 59.2%), distance from residence (12; 24.5%), low hourly load (four; 8.2%), and other issues (four; 8.2%).

The data underscores the need to adjust technical training in Radiotherapy, emphasizing the importance of a recognized professional team, practical learning, flexible schedules, and financial viability.

The strategic perspective of radiotherapy technicians currently working in this job market, emphasized the need for an adjustment in the offering of courses. These insights provide more well-structured foundations for contemporary teaching and learning processes, considering current societal characteristics, technological advances, and future student demands.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
幕后花絮专业人士眼中的放射治疗技术培训
由于早期癌症诊断、全球人口老龄化、癌症发病率上升以及设备和技术的不断发展,对放射治疗专业技术人员的需求日益增长,因此培训放射治疗专业技术人员至关重要。我们的目标是收集各种课程的毕业生的意见,他们目前正在从事专业工作,我们的原则是,评估教育培训的一种方法是考虑受过培训的在职专业人员认为他们所学的提高课程中的重要属性。我们开展了一项横向研究(已获当地研究伦理委员会批准),其中包括一项在线调查,征求已获得放射治疗技术员或技师资格并从事这项工作的专业人员的意见。问卷包括 12 道客观选择题和 4 道开放式问题。在收到的 59 份答复中,49 名专业人员完成了某些课程。31人(64.6%)参加了改进/提高课程,其次是专业课程(15人,31.2%)和扩展课程(2人,4.2%)。有 34 名(69.4%)受访者在培训期间没有参加过任何实践活动。这些数据强调了调整放射治疗技术培训的必要性,强调了公认的专业团队、实践学习、灵活的时间安排和财务可行性的重要性。考虑到当前的社会特点、技术进步和未来学生的需求,这些见解为当代教学和学习过程提供了结构更合理的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
审稿时长
67 days
期刊最新文献
The status quo of global geriatric radiation oncology education: A scoping review A systematic review of prostate bed motion and anisotropic margins in post-prostatectomy external beam radiotherapy International virtual radiation therapy professional development: Reflections on a twinning collaboration between a low/middle and high income country A code orange for traffic-light-protocols as a communication mechanism in IGRT On the trail of CBCT-guided adaptive rectal boost radiotherapy, does daily delineation require a radiation oncologist?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1