The Drug Burden Index is associated with Measures of Cognitive Function Among Older Adults in the Health, Aging, and Body Composition Study

Janie C DiNatale, Ian M McDonough, Amy C Ellis, Joy W Douglas, Kristine Yaffe, Kristi M Crowe-White
{"title":"The Drug Burden Index is associated with Measures of Cognitive Function Among Older Adults in the Health, Aging, and Body Composition Study","authors":"Janie C DiNatale, Ian M McDonough, Amy C Ellis, Joy W Douglas, Kristine Yaffe, Kristi M Crowe-White","doi":"10.1093/gerona/glae097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND Anticholinergic and sedative medications impact cognition among older adults. The Drug Burden Index (DBI) is a validated measure of exposure to these medications, with higher DBI scores indicating higher drug burden. This ancillary analysis investigated the association between DBI and cognition assessed by the Modified Mini-Mental State Examination (3MS) and the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST). METHODS The Health, Aging, and Body Composition Study was a prospective study of community-dwelling adults ages 70-79 years at enrollment. Using data from years 1, 5, and 10, DBI was calculated using medication data per participant. Linear mixed modeling was used to assess cross-sectional and longitudinal effects of DBI on 3MS and DSST. Adjusted models included biological sex, race, education level, APOE status, and death. Sensitivity analyses included testing the strength of the associations for each year and testing attrition due to death as a possible confounding factor via Cox-Proportional Hazard models. RESULTS After adjustment, DBI was inversely associated with 3MS and DSST scores. These associations became stronger in each subsequent year. Neither DBI at year 1 nor within-person change in DBI were predictive of longitudinal declines in either cognitive measure. Sensitivity analyses indicated that DBI, 3MS, and DSST were associated with a greater risk of attrition due to death. CONCLUSIONS Results suggest that in years when older adults had a higher DBI scores, they had significantly lower global cognition and slower processing speed. These findings further substantiate the DBI as a useful pharmacological tool for assessing the effect of medication exposure.","PeriodicalId":22892,"journal":{"name":"The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glae097","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Anticholinergic and sedative medications impact cognition among older adults. The Drug Burden Index (DBI) is a validated measure of exposure to these medications, with higher DBI scores indicating higher drug burden. This ancillary analysis investigated the association between DBI and cognition assessed by the Modified Mini-Mental State Examination (3MS) and the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST). METHODS The Health, Aging, and Body Composition Study was a prospective study of community-dwelling adults ages 70-79 years at enrollment. Using data from years 1, 5, and 10, DBI was calculated using medication data per participant. Linear mixed modeling was used to assess cross-sectional and longitudinal effects of DBI on 3MS and DSST. Adjusted models included biological sex, race, education level, APOE status, and death. Sensitivity analyses included testing the strength of the associations for each year and testing attrition due to death as a possible confounding factor via Cox-Proportional Hazard models. RESULTS After adjustment, DBI was inversely associated with 3MS and DSST scores. These associations became stronger in each subsequent year. Neither DBI at year 1 nor within-person change in DBI were predictive of longitudinal declines in either cognitive measure. Sensitivity analyses indicated that DBI, 3MS, and DSST were associated with a greater risk of attrition due to death. CONCLUSIONS Results suggest that in years when older adults had a higher DBI scores, they had significantly lower global cognition and slower processing speed. These findings further substantiate the DBI as a useful pharmacological tool for assessing the effect of medication exposure.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
药物负担指数与健康、衰老和身体成分研究中老年人的认知功能测试结果有关
背景 抗胆碱能药物和镇静药物会影响老年人的认知能力。药物负担指数(DBI)是衡量这些药物暴露程度的有效指标,DBI 分数越高,表明药物负担越重。本辅助分析调查了 DBI 与通过改良版迷你精神状态检查 (3MS) 和数字符号替换测试 (DSST) 评估的认知能力之间的关联。方法 健康、衰老和身体成分研究是一项前瞻性研究,研究对象是70-79岁在社区居住的成年人。利用第 1 年、第 5 年和第 10 年的数据,通过每位参与者的用药数据计算出 DBI。线性混合模型用于评估 DBI 对 3MS 和 DSST 的横向和纵向影响。调整模型包括生物性别、种族、教育水平、APOE 状态和死亡。敏感性分析包括检测每年的关联强度,以及通过 Cox 比例危险模型检测死亡导致的自然减员是否是一个可能的混杂因素。结果 经调整后,DBI 与 3MS 和 DSST 评分成反比。这种相关性在随后的每一年都变得更强。无论是第 1 年的 DBI 还是 DBI 的人际变化都不能预测两种认知指标的纵向下降。敏感性分析表明,DBI、3MS 和 DSST 与死亡导致的更大减员风险有关。结论 结果表明,当老年人的 DBI 分数较高时,他们的整体认知能力明显较低,处理速度也较慢。这些研究结果进一步证实了 DBI 是一种有用的药理学工具,可用于评估药物暴露的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Does sleep moderate the effects of exercise training or complex mental and social activities on cognitive function in adults with chronic stroke? Secondary analysis of a randomized trial The influence of body mass index on biomarkers of cellular senescence in older adults Late-onset caloric restriction improves cognitive performance and restores circadian patterns of neurotrophic, clock and epigenetic factors in the hippocampus of male old rats Longitudinal Changes in Peak Expiratory Flow Predict Risk for Incident Dementia Association between TTV viremia, chronic inflammation, and ischemic heart disease risk: Insights from MARK-AGE and Report-Age projects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1