Impact of land restitution benefits on Water, Energy and Food (WEF) misgovernance and social injustice

IF 5.4 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental and Sustainability Indicators Pub Date : 2024-04-03 DOI:10.1016/j.indic.2024.100386
Saul Ngarava
{"title":"Impact of land restitution benefits on Water, Energy and Food (WEF) misgovernance and social injustice","authors":"Saul Ngarava","doi":"10.1016/j.indic.2024.100386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Land restitution has been used to achieve redistributive justice. However, such social justice has been compromised by the misgovernance of water, energy, and food (WEF) which has resulted in distributive injustices and compromised welfare outcomes. The objective of the study was to ascertain the land restitution benefactor impacts on WEF misgovernance in lieu of offsetting social injustice. The study was carried out in Matatiele, Magareng and Greater Taung Local Municipalities in South Africa. A purposively selected sample of 1184 households was obtained through a cross-sectional survey using a semi-structured questionnaire. Vulnerability indices, independent sample t-tests and Propensity Score Matching were used to analyze the data. The results showed that land restitution beneficiaries were vulnerable to WEF misgovernance relative to social injustice. In addition, becoming a land restitution benefactor had a significant impact and increased the level of vulnerability to WEF misgovernance. This was mainly through increased exposure and sensitivity to WEF misgovernance. Benefiting from land restitution did not have an impact on vulnerability to WEF social injustice, even though exposure and adaptive capacity to social injustice were increased. The study concludes that benefiting from land restitution increased vulnerability to WEF misgovernance while having no impact on social injustice. The study recommends improving access and fixing dilapidated WEF infrastructure in land-restituted areas. <span>Furthermore</span>, there is a need to implement livelihood-improving programs in addition to social protection support to enhance access to WEF resources. Water, energy, and food (WEF) decision-making should be decentralized to improve participation, governance, and procedural justice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36171,"journal":{"name":"Environmental and Sustainability Indicators","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665972724000540/pdfft?md5=015a22065bd06391e54c2107dce4794d&pid=1-s2.0-S2665972724000540-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental and Sustainability Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665972724000540","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Land restitution has been used to achieve redistributive justice. However, such social justice has been compromised by the misgovernance of water, energy, and food (WEF) which has resulted in distributive injustices and compromised welfare outcomes. The objective of the study was to ascertain the land restitution benefactor impacts on WEF misgovernance in lieu of offsetting social injustice. The study was carried out in Matatiele, Magareng and Greater Taung Local Municipalities in South Africa. A purposively selected sample of 1184 households was obtained through a cross-sectional survey using a semi-structured questionnaire. Vulnerability indices, independent sample t-tests and Propensity Score Matching were used to analyze the data. The results showed that land restitution beneficiaries were vulnerable to WEF misgovernance relative to social injustice. In addition, becoming a land restitution benefactor had a significant impact and increased the level of vulnerability to WEF misgovernance. This was mainly through increased exposure and sensitivity to WEF misgovernance. Benefiting from land restitution did not have an impact on vulnerability to WEF social injustice, even though exposure and adaptive capacity to social injustice were increased. The study concludes that benefiting from land restitution increased vulnerability to WEF misgovernance while having no impact on social injustice. The study recommends improving access and fixing dilapidated WEF infrastructure in land-restituted areas. Furthermore, there is a need to implement livelihood-improving programs in addition to social protection support to enhance access to WEF resources. Water, energy, and food (WEF) decision-making should be decentralized to improve participation, governance, and procedural justice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
土地归还收益对水、能源和粮食(WEF)治理不善和社会不公的影响
土地归还被用来实现再分配的公正。然而,水、能源和粮食(WEF)的管理不善损害了这种社会公正,导致分配不公和福利成果受损。本研究的目的是确定土地归还受益人对水、能源和粮食治理不当的影响,以弥补社会不公。研究在南非的马塔蒂埃勒、马加伦和大塔恩地方市镇进行。通过使用半结构式问卷进行横截面调查,有目的性地选取了 1184 个家庭作为样本。数据分析采用了脆弱性指数、独立样本 t 检验和倾向得分匹配法。结果显示,相对于社会不公而言,土地归还受益人更容易受到世界环境基金治理不当的影响。此外,成为土地归还受益人会产生重大影响,并增加对世界环境基金不当治理的脆弱性。这主要是由于增加了对世界环境基金不当治理的接触和敏感性。从土地归还中受益并没有影响对世界环境基金社会不公正的脆弱性,尽管对社会不公正的暴露和适应能力有所提高。研究得出结论,从土地归还中受益增加了对世界环境基金不当治理的脆弱性,但对社会不公正没有影响。研究建议改善土地归还地区的交通,修复破旧的世界环境基金基础设施。此外,除了提供社会保护支持外,还需要实施改善生计的计划,以增加获得世界环境基金资源的机会。水、能源和粮食(WEF)决策权应下放,以改善参与、治理和程序公正。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental and Sustainability Indicators
Environmental and Sustainability Indicators Environmental Science-Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
2.30%
发文量
49
审稿时长
57 days
期刊最新文献
Umbrella index as a conservation tool across pondscapes: A case study using frogs, aquatic insects, and plants in South Africa Climate change vulnerability and adaptive capacity of smallholder farmers: A financing gap perspective Assessing the efficacy of green walls versus street green lanes in mitigating air pollution: A critical evaluation The hidden development patterns of Africa and their sustainability correlations Effects of extension service on the uptake of climate-smart sorghum production practices: Insights from drylands of Ethiopia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1